Suppr超能文献

硬膜外容量扩张与硬膜外穿刺分娩镇痛的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Epidural volume extension versus dural puncture epidural analgesia for labor: A prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Doymus Omer, Aydin Muhammed Enes, Bedir Zehra, Tor Ibrahim Hakki, Ejder Tekgunduz Sibel, Doymus Gozde, Celik Erkan Cem, Ahiskalioglu Ali

机构信息

Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Erzurum, Turkey.

Ataturk University School of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 7;104(10):e41691. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041691.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing effective labor analgesia is very important for maternal and infant safety. Various neuraxial techniques are used for this purpose. Our objective was to compare the epidural volume extension (EVE) and dural puncture epidural (DPE) procedures employed in clinical practice for labor analgesia, focusing on labor parameters, pain levels, fetal outcomes, and complications.

METHODS

Sixty patients were randomized to EVE (n = 30) and DPE (n = 30). In the EVE group, 1 mL of a mixture containing a combination of 10 µg fentanyl and 0.25% isobaric bupivacaine was injected into the intrathecal region via a 25-G 120 mm Whitacre spinal needle. Then, 7.4 mL of 0.9% NaCl was injected into the epidural area. In the DPE group, after dural puncture with the same procedure, 20 mL of a mixture containing a combination of 2 µg/mL fentanyl and 0.125% isobaric bupivacaine was injected into the epidural area. Time of required the first top-up dose, numerical pain rating scale ≤ 1 and bilateral S2 block time, sensory block level, number of top-up doses required during labor, incidence of complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were analyzed. First top-up time-the primary outcome of the study, was similar between groups (76.45 ± 17.38 vs 88.20 ± 31.38, P = .067). Time to reach minimum pain score, numerical pain rating scale ≤ 1, bilateral S2 block time was significantly shorter in group EVE compared to group DPE. There was no statistical significance in terms of peak dermatome level and total number of administered top-ups, time to reach peak dermatome, incidence of complications.

CONCLUSION

While the EVE technique necessitates a reduced total volume of local anesthetic, it results in a more rapid ascent of the dermatomal level and a quicker reduction in pain scores; we believe that both strategies can be utilized effectively and safely for labor analgesia. However, randomized comparative studies with larger sample sizes are required to find the optimal strategy.

摘要

背景

提供有效的分娩镇痛对母婴安全非常重要。为此采用了各种神经轴技术。我们的目的是比较临床实践中用于分娩镇痛的硬膜外容积扩展(EVE)和硬膜穿刺硬膜外(DPE)操作,重点关注分娩参数、疼痛程度、胎儿结局和并发症。

方法

60例患者随机分为EVE组(n = 30)和DPE组(n = 30)。在EVE组中,通过25G 120mm Whitacre腰麻针将1mL含有10μg芬太尼和0.25%等比重布比卡因的混合液注入鞘内区域。然后,将7.4mL 0.9%氯化钠注入硬膜外区域。在DPE组中,采用相同程序进行硬膜穿刺后,将20mL含有2μg/mL芬太尼和0.125%等比重布比卡因的混合液注入硬膜外区域。记录首次追加剂量所需时间、数字疼痛评分量表≤1以及双侧S2阻滞时间、感觉阻滞平面、分娩期间所需追加剂量次数、并发症发生率。

结果

共分析了60例患者。首次追加时间——研究的主要结局,两组之间相似(76.45±17.38 vs 88.20±31.38,P = 0.067)。与DPE组相比,EVE组达到最低疼痛评分、数字疼痛评分量表≤1、双侧S2阻滞时间明显更短。在皮节最高平面、追加给药总数、达到最高皮节的时间、并发症发生率方面无统计学意义。

结论

虽然EVE技术需要减少局部麻醉药的总量,但它能使皮节平面上升更快,疼痛评分降低更快;我们认为这两种策略均可有效且安全地用于分娩镇痛。然而,需要更大样本量的随机对照研究来找到最佳策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b767/11902976/4a2d3427f225/medi-104-e41691-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验