Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.120. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
Self-expanding (SE) valves are characterized with long stent frame design and the radial force of the device exists both in the inflow and outflow level. Therefore, we hypothesized that device success of SE-valves may be influenced by ascending aortic dimensions (AAD). The aim of this study was to determine the influence of AAD on acute device success rates following SE transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
METHODS & RESULTS: In 4 centers in the United States and Asia, 214 consecutive patients underwent SE-TAVR. Outcomes were assessed in line with Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. AAD was defined as the sum of the short and long axis aortic diameter divided by 2. Overall, device success rate was 85.0%. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased AAD (Odds ratio 1.27) and % oversizing (Odds ratio 0.88) were found to be independent predictors of unsuccessful device implantation. The c-statistic of the model for device success was area under the curve 0.79, sensitivity 81.3% and specificity 44.0%. Co-existence of several risk factors was associated with an exponential fall to 64.2% in device success rate. For a large AAD, however, optimally oversized SE-valves (threshold 16.2%) resulted with high device success rates compared to suboptimal oversizing (88.6% vs. 64.2%, p=0.005).
Larger AAD and smaller degrees of oversizing were confirmed to be the most relevant predictors of unsuccessful device implantation following SE-valve implantations. Optimal oversizing of great significance was noted, particularly that with a large AAD.
自膨式(SE)瓣膜的特点是支架框架设计较长,并且器械的径向力存在于流入道和流出道水平。因此,我们假设 SE 瓣膜的器械成功率可能受升主动脉尺寸(AAD)的影响。本研究旨在确定 AAD 对 SE 经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后急性器械成功率的影响。
在美国和亚洲的 4 个中心,连续入组 214 例患者行 SE-TAVR。根据 Valve Academic Research Consortium 标准评估结果。AAD 定义为短轴和长轴主动脉直径之和除以 2。总体而言,器械成功率为 85.0%。多变量分析显示,AAD 增加(优势比 1.27)和 %过度扩张(优势比 0.88)是器械植入不成功的独立预测因素。器械成功模型的 C 统计量为曲线下面积 0.79,敏感性 81.3%,特异性 44.0%。多个危险因素并存与器械成功率呈指数下降至 64.2%相关。然而,对于大 AAD,最佳过度扩张的 SE 瓣膜(阈值 16.2%)与次优过度扩张(88.6%比 64.2%,p=0.005)相比,器械成功率较高。
更大的 AAD 和更小的过度扩张程度被证实是 SE 瓣膜植入后器械植入不成功的最相关预测因素。注意到最佳过度扩张具有重要意义,尤其是在 AAD 较大时。