• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估糖尿病患者的口腔护理质量:电子健康记录中口腔护理质量测量工具的改编和测试。

Evaluating quality of dental care among patients with diabetes: Adaptation and testing of a dental quality measure in electronic health records.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Sep;148(9):634-643.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2017.04.017
PMID:28624074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6590708/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes are at increased risk of developing oral complications, and annual dental examinations are an endorsed preventive strategy. The authors evaluated the feasibility and validity of implementing an automated electronic health record (EHR)-based dental quality measure to determine whether patients with diabetes received such evaluations.

METHODS

The authors selected a Dental Quality Alliance measure developed for claims data and adapted the specifications for EHRs. Automated queries identified patients with diabetes across 4 dental institutions, and the authors manually reviewed a subsample of charts to evaluate query performance. After assessing the initial EHR measure, the authors defined and tested a revised EHR measure to capture better the oral care received by patients with diabetes.

RESULTS

In the initial and revised measures, the authors used EHR automated queries to identify 12,960 and 13,221 patients with diabetes, respectively, in the reporting year. Variations in the measure scores across sites were greater with the initial measure (range, 36.4-71.3%) than with the revised measure (range, 78.8-88.1%). The automated query performed well (93% or higher) for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for both measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that an automated EHR-based query can be used successfully to measure the quality of oral health care delivered to patients with diabetes. The authors also found that using the rich data available in EHRs may help estimate the quality of care better than can relying on claims data.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Detailed clinical patient-level data in dental EHRs may be useful to dentists in evaluating the quality of dental care provided to patients with diabetes.

摘要

背景

糖尿病患者发生口腔并发症的风险增加,年度牙科检查是一种被认可的预防策略。作者评估了实施基于电子健康记录(EHR)的自动牙科质量测量的可行性和有效性,以确定是否对糖尿病患者进行了此类评估。

方法

作者选择了一个针对索赔数据开发的牙科质量联盟(Dental Quality Alliance)措施,并对其规格进行了调整,以适应 EHR。自动查询在 4 家牙科机构中确定了糖尿病患者,并对图表的一个子样本进行了人工审查,以评估查询的性能。在评估初始 EHR 措施后,作者定义并测试了一个经修订的 EHR 措施,以更好地捕捉糖尿病患者接受的口腔护理。

结果

在初始和修订的措施中,作者分别使用 EHR 自动查询在报告年度中确定了 12960 名和 13221 名糖尿病患者。与修订后的措施(范围为 78.8%-88.1%)相比,措施得分在各站点之间的差异更大(范围为 36.4%-71.3%)。对于两个措施,自动查询的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均在 93%或以上。

结论

结果表明,基于 EHR 的自动查询可成功用于测量向糖尿病患者提供的口腔卫生保健质量。作者还发现,与依赖索赔数据相比,使用 EHR 中可用的丰富数据可能有助于更好地估计护理质量。

实用意义

牙科 EHR 中的详细临床患者级数据可能对牙医评估向糖尿病患者提供的牙科护理质量有用。

相似文献

1
Evaluating quality of dental care among patients with diabetes: Adaptation and testing of a dental quality measure in electronic health records.评估糖尿病患者的口腔护理质量:电子健康记录中口腔护理质量测量工具的改编和测试。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Sep;148(9):634-643.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
2
Measuring up: Implementing a dental quality measure in the electronic health record context.衡量标准:在电子健康记录环境中实施一项牙科质量指标。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jan;147(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
3
Measuring Diabetes Care Performance Using Electronic Health Record Data: The Impact of Diabetes Definitions on Performance Measure Outcomes.利用电子健康记录数据衡量糖尿病护理绩效:糖尿病定义对绩效指标结果的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):292-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860613500808. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
4
Number of Pregnant Women at Four Dental Clinics and the Care They Received: A Dental Quality eMeasure Evaluation.四家牙科诊所有多少孕妇及其接受的护理:牙科质量电子衡量评估。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Oct;83(10):1158-1165. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.123. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
5
Composite quality of care scores, electronic health record maturity models, and their associations; preliminary literature review results.综合医疗质量评分、电子健康记录成熟度模型及其关联;初步文献综述结果。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:981.
6
Assessing the completeness of periodontal disease documentation in the EHR: a first step in measuring the quality of care.评估电子健康记录中牙周疾病文档的完整性:衡量医疗质量的第一步。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 29;21(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01633-w.
7
Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature.综述:电子健康记录与质量指标的可靠性和有效性:文献回顾。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Oct;67(5):503-27. doi: 10.1177/1077558709359007. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
8
Oral Health Care Quality Measurement and Its Role in Dental Education.口腔保健质量评估及其在牙科教育中的作用。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Dec;81(12):1395-1404. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.099.
9
Variation in outcomes of quality measurement by data source.不同数据源的质量测量结果存在差异。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1676-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4277.
10
Feasibility of evaluating the CHIPRA care quality measures in electronic health record data.评估 CHIPRA 护理质量措施在电子健康记录数据中的可行性。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):139-49. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3705. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning from data in dentistry: Summary of the third annual OpenWide conference.从牙科数据中学习:第三届年度OpenWide会议总结
Learn Health Syst. 2023 Oct 19;8(2):e10398. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10398. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Current state of dental informatics in the field of health information systems: a scoping review.口腔信息学在健康信息系统领域的现状:范围综述。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02163-9.
3
BigMouth: development and maintenance of a successful dental data repository.大嘴:成功的牙科数据存储库的开发和维护。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):701-706. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac001.
4
Caries Risk Documentation And Prevention: eMeasures For Dental Electronic Health Records.龋病风险记录和预防:口腔电子健康记录的电子措施。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):80-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740920. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
Assessing the completeness of periodontal disease documentation in the EHR: a first step in measuring the quality of care.评估电子健康记录中牙周疾病文档的完整性:衡量医疗质量的第一步。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 29;21(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01633-w.
6
Measuring sealant placement in children at the dental practice level.测量儿童在牙科诊所的封闭剂使用情况。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Oct;151(10):745-754. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.06.015.
7
Usage and Scientific Properties of the ADVOCATE Oral Health Care Measures.ADVOCATE 口腔保健措施的使用和科学特性。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Oct;5(4):385-398. doi: 10.1177/2380084420902464. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Number of Pregnant Women at Four Dental Clinics and the Care They Received: A Dental Quality eMeasure Evaluation.四家牙科诊所有多少孕妇及其接受的护理:牙科质量电子衡量评估。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Oct;83(10):1158-1165. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.123. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
Unintended consequences and challenges of quality measurements in dentistry.牙科质量测量的意外后果和挑战。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Mar 1;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0726-4.
10
Tobacco screening and cessation efforts by dental providers: A quality measure evaluation.口腔医疗服务提供者开展的烟草筛查和戒烟工作:一项质量措施评估。
J Public Health Dent. 2019 Mar;79(2):93-101. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12298. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption of dental innovations: The case of a standardized dental diagnostic terminology.采用牙科创新:标准化牙科诊断术语的案例。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 May;148(5):319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
2
Measuring up: Implementing a dental quality measure in the electronic health record context.衡量标准:在电子健康记录环境中实施一项牙科质量指标。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jan;147(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
3
Dental clinical research: an illustration of the value of standardized diagnostic terms.牙科临床研究:标准化诊断术语价值的例证
J Public Health Dent. 2016 Mar;76(2):152-6. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12124. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
4
Measuring quality of dental care: Caries prevention services for children.衡量牙科护理质量:儿童龋齿预防服务
J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Aug;146(8):581-591. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.03.017.
5
Attitudes toward and beliefs about the use of a dental diagnostic terminology: A survey of dental care providers in a dental practice.对牙科诊断术语使用的态度和看法:对一家牙科诊所的牙科护理提供者的调查。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Jun;146(6):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.02.007.
6
BigMouth: a multi-institutional dental data repository.大嘴:一个多机构牙科数据存储库。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1136-40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002230. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
7
Dental findings and identification of undiagnosed hyperglycemia.口腔检查与未诊断的高血糖症的鉴定。
J Dent Res. 2013 Oct;92(10):888-92. doi: 10.1177/0022034513502791. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
8
Validity and reliability of self-reported diabetes in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中自我报告糖尿病的有效性和可靠性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Oct 15;176(8):738-43. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws156. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
9
Detection and characterization of usability problems in structured data entry interfaces in dentistry.检测和描述牙科学中结构化数据输入界面的可用性问题。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Feb;82(2):128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
10
Diabetes performance measures: current status and future directions.糖尿病绩效指标:现状与未来方向。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jul;34(7):1651-9. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0735.