Carmel-Neiderman Narin Nard, Wasserzug Oshri, Ziv-Baran Tomer, Oestreicher-Kedem Yael
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
The study aimed (1) to evaluate the prevalence of sulcus vocalis (SV) coexisting with vocal fold polyp (SV-VFP), and (2) to determine the effect of their coexistence on voice quality.
This is a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center.
The medical records of all patients who underwent micro direct laryngoscopy due to VFPs between January 2013 and April 2015 were reviewed. Patients with SV-VFP were identified and data of their demographics, medical history, habits, preoperative and intraoperative laryngeal findings, and pre- and postoperative GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) score, and compared with the data of patients with solitary VFPs (S-VFPs).
Eighty-nine patients were diagnosed with VFPs, 14 (15.7%) of whom were diagnosed with SV-VFPs. Patients with SV-VFPs had significantly lower incidence of concurrent leukoplakia (P = 0.01), higher incidence of contralateral vocal fold lesions (P = 0.04), increased voice roughness score postoperatively (P = 0.01) on the GRBAS score, and had a lower rate of cigarette smoking (P = 0.02) compared with patients with S-VFPs.
The possibility of a hidden SV should be considered when detecting VFPs, particularly in patients with contralateral vocal fold lesions and without cigarette smoking history. Because the group of patients with SV-VFP presented with unique features, we suspect that the coexistence of VFPs and SVs is not incidental and that SVs may contribute to the formation of VFPs, possibly by alternating glottic airflow.
本研究旨在(1)评估声沟(SV)与声带息肉(SV-VFP)共存的患病率,以及(2)确定它们共存对嗓音质量的影响。
这是一项在三级转诊中心进行的回顾性队列研究。
回顾了2013年1月至2015年4月期间因声带息肉接受显微直接喉镜检查的所有患者的病历。识别出患有SV-VFP的患者,并收集他们的人口统计学、病史、习惯、术前和术中喉部检查结果,以及术前和术后GRBAS(分级、粗糙度、气息声、无力、紧张)评分数据,并与孤立性声带息肉(S-VFP)患者的数据进行比较。
89例患者被诊断为声带息肉,其中14例(15.7%)被诊断为SV-VFP。与S-VFP患者相比,SV-VFP患者同时患白斑的发生率显著更低(P = 0.01),对侧声带病变的发生率更高(P = 0.04),术后GRBAS评分中的嗓音粗糙度评分增加(P = 0.01),吸烟率更低(P = 0.02)。
在检测声带息肉时,应考虑隐匿性SV的可能性,特别是在对侧声带病变且无吸烟史的患者中。由于SV-VFP患者组呈现出独特的特征,我们怀疑声带息肉和SV的共存并非偶然,并且SV可能通过改变声门气流促进声带息肉的形成。