• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[48例双侧声带广基息肉患者不同手术方式疗效的主观与客观评价]

[Subjective and objective evaluation of the efficacy of different surgical procedures in 48 patients with bilateral sessile polyps of vocal cords].

作者信息

Liu Jie, Xiao Cui, Deng Li, Wu Xingdong, Wu Xianwen, Hu Guohua, Yu Lin

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing,400016,China.

出版信息

Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb;35(2):160-163. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.02.015.

DOI:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.02.015
PMID:33541000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10127872/
Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of CO2 laser and CO2 laser combined with microsuture in the treatment of bilateral sessile polyps of vocal cords. Forty-eight patients with bilateral sessile polyps of vocal cords were randomly divided into CO2 laser group and CO2 laser combined with microsuture group. The surgical effect of each group and the difference between the two groups were evaluated by subjective score and objective voice analysis. One month and three month after operation, Jitter, Shimmer, dysphonia severity index(DSI), the maximum phonation time(MPT), the parameters of G and voice handicap index(VHI-10) in the two groups were significantly different from pre-operation(<0.05). There were also significant differences in Jitter, Shimmer, DSI and MPT between the two groups one month and three month after operation respectively(<0.05). But no significant differences of the parameters of G and VHI-10 was noted between two groups(>0.05). The incidence of postoperative vocal cord adhesion was 8.3% and 0 in two groups respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups(>0.05). The CO2 laser combined with microsuturing technique can effectively improve the voice quality of patients with bilateral wide-based vocal cord polyps, and the effect is better than that of using CO2 laser alone.

摘要

本研究旨在评估二氧化碳激光及二氧化碳激光联合显微缝合术治疗双侧声带广基息肉的疗效。将48例双侧声带广基息肉患者随机分为二氧化碳激光组和二氧化碳激光联合显微缝合组。通过主观评分和客观嗓音分析评估每组的手术效果及两组间的差异。术后1个月及3个月时,两组的基频微扰(Jitter)、振幅微扰(Shimmer)、嗓音障碍严重指数(DSI)、最长发声时间(MPT)、G参数及嗓音障碍指数(VHI-10)与术前相比均有显著差异(<0.05)。术后1个月及3个月时,两组的Jitter、Shimmer、DSI及MPT也分别有显著差异(<0.05)。但两组的G参数及VHI-10无显著差异(>0.05)。两组术后声带粘连发生率分别为8.3%和0,两组间无显著差异(>0.05)。二氧化碳激光联合显微缝合技术能有效改善双侧广基声带息肉患者的嗓音质量,效果优于单纯使用二氧化碳激光。

相似文献

1
[Subjective and objective evaluation of the efficacy of different surgical procedures in 48 patients with bilateral sessile polyps of vocal cords].[48例双侧声带广基息肉患者不同手术方式疗效的主观与客观评价]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb;35(2):160-163. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.02.015.
2
An Analysis of the Effects of Voice Therapy on Patients With Early Vocal Fold Polyps.嗓音疗法对早期声带息肉患者的疗效分析
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
Analysis of the clinical efficacy and voice outcomes of CO laser resection versus laryngeal microsurgery for vocal cord polyps.CO2 激光切除术与喉显微手术治疗声带息肉的临床疗效及嗓音效果分析。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2280228. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2280228. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
[Observation of the dysphonia severity index in evaluating curative effect of vocal cord polyp surgery].[嗓音障碍严重程度指数在评估声带息肉手术疗效中的观察]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;50(8):673-6.
5
Office-based Blue Laser Therapy of Vocal Fold Polyps: A Cohort of 18 Patients: Blue Laser Therapy of Vocal Fold Polyps.基于办公室的声带息肉蓝激光治疗:18 例患者的队列研究:声带息肉的蓝激光治疗。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Oct;133(10):2712-2718. doi: 10.1002/lary.30602. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
[Analysis of therapeutic effect of fibrocystic degeneration of vocal folds].[声带纤维囊性变的治疗效果分析]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Oct;38(10):935-939;946. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.10.010.
7
A 532-nm KTP Laser for Vocal Fold Polyps: Efficacy and Relative Factors.532nm KTP 激光治疗声带息肉:疗效及相关因素。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Feb;100(1_suppl):87S-93S. doi: 10.1177/0145561320946153. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
8
[Utility of preoperative voice therapy on the voice recovery of vocal cord polyps patients undergoing the microsurgery].[术前嗓音治疗对接受显微手术的声带息肉患者嗓音恢复的效用]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar;32(6):408-411. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.06.003.
9
Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp.早期声带息肉患者行嗓音训练与嗓音微创手术疗效比较。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov-Dec;85(6):678-684. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 May 9.
10
The Value of Vocal Extent Measure (VEM) Assessing Phonomicrosurgical Outcomes in Vocal Fold Polyps.嗓音范围测量(VEM)在评估声带息肉显微手术结果中的价值
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):114.e7-114.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
[Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of URICA-Voice scale].[中文版URICA-语音量表的信效度]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 May;37(5):323-328. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.05.001.
2
[Detection of speech pathology based on parameters of analysis of dysphonia in speech and voice].基于言语和嗓音中发声障碍分析参数的言语病理学检测
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jul;36(7):492-496. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.07.002.
3
[The effect of expression of pepsin in vocal polyps on postoperative curative effect].[胃蛋白酶在声带息肉中的表达对术后疗效的影响]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jan;36(1):14-18. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.01.003.
4
[Autologous fat granule filling combined with microsuture technique for sulcus vocalis].自体脂肪颗粒填充联合显微缝合技术治疗声带沟
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 May;35(5):405-409. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.05.005.

本文引用的文献

1
Voice Characteristics in Patients with Thyroid Disorders.甲状腺疾病患者的嗓音特征
Eurasian J Med. 2019 Jun;51(2):101-105. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18331.
2
[Analysis of CO₂ laser and conventional laryngomicrosurgery treatments for vocal cord cyst: an evaluation of short-term voice acoustics outcomes].[二氧化碳激光与传统喉显微手术治疗声带囊肿的分析:短期嗓音声学结果评估]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 May;33(5):455-458. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2019.05.017.
3
Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp.早期声带息肉患者行嗓音训练与嗓音微创手术疗效比较。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov-Dec;85(6):678-684. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
Effect of voice therapy on vocal fold polyp treatment.嗓音治疗对声带息肉治疗的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;275(6):1533-1540. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4962-z. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Benign vocal fold lesions: update on nomenclature, cause, diagnosis, and treatment.良性声带病变:命名、病因、诊断及治疗的最新进展
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec;25(6):453-458. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000408.
6
Coexisting Vocal Fold Polyps and Sulcus Vocalis: Coincidence or Coexistence? Characteristics of 14 Patients.声带息肉与声带沟并存:巧合还是共存?14例患者的特征
J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
7
Association between Laryngeal Pepsin Levels and the Presence of Vocal Fold Polyps.喉中胃蛋白酶水平与声带息肉存在之间的关联
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan;156(1):144-151. doi: 10.1177/0194599816676471. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
8
Treatment for Vocal Polyps: Lips and Tongue Trill.声带息肉的治疗:唇舌颤音。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):252.e27-252.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
9
Treatment Efficacy of Voice Therapy for Vocal Fold Polyps and Factors Predictive of Its Efficacy.嗓音治疗对声带息肉的疗效及疗效预测因素
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):120.e9-120.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
10
Conservative management for vocal fold polyps.声带息肉的保守治疗。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;140(5):448-52. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.243.