Laboratory of Nanosystems and Drug Delivery Devices (NanoSYS), School of Pharmacy - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Rua 240, Setor Leste Universitário, 74.605-170 Goiânia-GO, Brazil.
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) - Praça Universitária, Setor Universitário, 74.605-220 Goiânia-GO, Brazil.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017 Oct;119:142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
Combined therapy with corticosteroids and immunosuppressant-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) could be useful in the treatment of skin diseases. To circumvent NLC loading capacity problems, loaded drugs should have different physicochemical characteristics, such as tacrolimus (TAC) and clobetasol (CLO). Therefore, in the present study, TAC and CLO were encapsulated in NLC (TAC-NLC, CLO-NLC and TAC+CLO-NLC), coated or otherwise with chitosan. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of different spin labels was used to investigate the impact of drug and oil incorporation on the lipid dynamic behavior of the lipid matrices. In addition, the impact of co-encapsulation on drug release and skin permeation was evaluated. Entrapment efficiency was greater than 90% for both drugs, even when the maximum drug loading achieved for TAC-NLC and CLO-NLC was kept at TAC+CLO-NLC, because TAC is more soluble in the solid lipid and CLO in the liquid lipid. EPR data indicated that both drugs reduced the lipid fluidity near the polar surface of the lipid matrix, which suggests their presence in this region. In addition, EPR data showed that liquid lipid is also present in more superficial regions of the nanoparticle matrix. CLO was released faster than TAC from TAC+CLO-NLC, probably because it is more soluble in the liquid lipid. TAC skin penetration was affected by CLO. A 5-fold increase in TAC penetration was observed from TAC+CLO-NLC when compared to TAC-NLC formulations. Coating also increased TAC and CLO permeation to deeper skin layers (1.8-fold and 1.6-fold, respectively). TAC+CLO-NLC seems to be an effective strategy for topical delivery of TAC and CLO, and thus constitutes promising formulations for the treatment of skin diseases.
皮质类固醇和载免疫抑制剂的纳米结构脂质载体(NLC)联合治疗可能对皮肤病的治疗有用。为了规避 NLC 的载药能力问题,载药应该具有不同的理化特性,如他克莫司(TAC)和卤倍他索(CLO)。因此,在本研究中,TAC 和 CLO 被包裹在 NLC 中(TAC-NLC、CLO-NLC 和 TAC+CLO-NLC),用壳聚糖进行包衣或其他处理。不同自旋标记物的电子顺磁共振(EPR)光谱用于研究药物和油的掺入对脂质基质的脂质动态行为的影响。此外,还评估了共包封对药物释放和皮肤渗透的影响。两种药物的包封效率均大于 90%,即使 TAC-NLC 和 CLO-NLC 达到的最大载药量保持在 TAC+CLO-NLC 中,因为 TAC 在固体脂质中溶解度更高,而 CLO 在液体脂质中溶解度更高。EPR 数据表明,两种药物都降低了脂质基质极性表面附近的脂质流动性,这表明它们存在于该区域。此外,EPR 数据还表明,液体脂质也存在于纳米颗粒基质的更浅层区域。从 TAC+CLO-NLC 中释放的 CLO 比 TAC-NLC 中的 TAC 更快,可能是因为它在液体脂质中的溶解度更高。TAC 的皮肤渗透受到 CLO 的影响。与 TAC-NLC 制剂相比,从 TAC+CLO-NLC 中观察到 TAC 渗透增加了 5 倍。包衣还增加了 TAC 和 CLO 向更深皮肤层的渗透(分别增加了 1.8 倍和 1.6 倍)。TAC+CLO-NLC 似乎是 TAC 和 CLO 经皮给药的有效策略,因此是治疗皮肤病的有前途的制剂。