Treiman Rebecca
a Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences , Washington University , St. Louis , MO , USA.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017 May-Jun;34(3-4):83-93. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1337630. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
An understanding of the nature of writing systems and of the typical course of spelling development is an essential foundation for understanding the problems of children who have serious difficulties in learning to spell. The present article seeks to provide that foundation. It argues that the dual-route models of spelling that underlie much existing research and practice are based on overly simple assumptions about how writing systems work and about how spelling skills develop. Many writing systems include not only context-free links from phonemes to letters but also context-sensitive phonological patterns, morphological influences, and graphotactic patterns. According to an alternative framework, IMP (integration of multiple patterns), spellers acquire multiple sources of information through use of their statistical-learning skills and through direct instruction. Children learn the spelling of a word most easily when different patterns converge on the spelling, and they have difficulty when patterns conflict. Implications of these ideas for assessment and instruction are considered.
理解书写系统的本质以及拼写发展的典型过程,是理解在学习拼写方面存在严重困难的儿童所面临问题的重要基础。本文旨在提供这一基础。文章认为,作为现有许多研究和实践基础的拼写双路径模型,是基于关于书写系统如何运作以及拼写技能如何发展的过于简单的假设。许多书写系统不仅包括从音素到字母的无上下文联系,还包括上下文敏感的语音模式、形态影响和字位组配模式。根据一个替代框架——多重模式整合(IMP),拼写者通过运用他们的统计学习技能和直接指导来获取多种信息来源。当不同模式在拼写方面趋于一致时,儿童最容易学习单词的拼写,而当模式相互冲突时,他们就会遇到困难。文中还考虑了这些观点对评估和教学的影响。