Yang D A, Heuer C, Laven R, Vink W D, Chesterton R N
a Institute for Veterinary, Animal, Biomedical Research , Massey University , Palmerston North 4474 , New Zealand.
b Operations Branch, Ministry for Primary Industries , Upper Hutt 5140 , New Zealand.
N Z Vet J. 2017 Sep;65(5):252-256. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2017.1344587. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
The aims of this cross-sectional study were to investigate the herd and cow-level prevalence of bovine digital dermatitis (BDD) in dairy farms in the northern Taranaki region of New Zealand, and to identify whether there was any spatial clustering of herds with the disease.
A survey of 224 dairy farms in the northern Taranaki region of New Zealand was undertaken from September 2014 to February 2015. Following training in robust criteria to confirm BDD visually, a technician inspected the rear feet of every milking cow on the farms during milking. The identity of cows with lesions and the feet involved were recorded. The proportion of cows affected among the inspected population (cow-level prevalence), the proportion of a herd affected (farm-level prevalence), and proportion of farms with ≥1 cow with lesions, were calculated. A bivariate K function analysis was then used to assess whether farms with ≥1 cow with lesions were clustered, after accounting for the distribution of the farms involved in the study.
Bovine digital dermatitis lesions were observed on 143/224 (63.8 (95% CI=57.5-70.1)%) farms. Within-farm prevalence was 0% on 81 (36.2%) farms, between >0 and <3% on 120 (53.5%) farms, with a maximum prevalence of 12.7% on one farm. Overall, cow-level prevalence was 707/60,455 (1.2 (95% CI=0.9-3.0)%), and on affected farms was 707/41,116 (1.7 (95% CI=1.4-2.1)%). In affected cows, 268/707 (37.9%) had a lesion on left foot only, 262/707 (37.1%) on the right foot only and 177/707 (25.0%) on both feet. The K function analysis showed no evidence of clustering of farms with BDD.
Bovine digital dermatitis was widespread among the survey farms, but there was no evidence that there was any clustering of herds with BDD. The cow-level prevalence on affected farms was much lower than reported elsewhere.
Although the prevalence at the cow level was low, if these data are representative of other regions of New Zealand, BDD could easily become a major problem on dairy farms in New Zealand, as has been observed in other countries.
本横断面研究旨在调查新西兰塔拉纳基地区北部奶牛场牛趾间皮炎(BDD)的畜群和个体奶牛患病率,并确定患病畜群是否存在空间聚集性。
2014年9月至2015年2月对新西兰塔拉纳基地区北部的224个奶牛场进行了调查。在接受了关于通过可靠标准进行BDD目视确诊的培训后,一名技术人员在挤奶期间检查了各农场每头泌乳奶牛的后蹄。记录有病变奶牛的身份及患病蹄部。计算了受检群体中患病奶牛的比例(个体奶牛患病率)、畜群中患病的比例(农场患病率)以及有≥1头奶牛出现病变的农场比例。在考虑了参与研究的农场分布情况后,采用双变量K函数分析来评估有≥1头奶牛出现病变的农场是否聚集。
在143/224(63.8(95%可信区间=57.5 - 70.1)%)个农场观察到牛趾间皮炎病变。81个(36.2%)农场的场内患病率为0%,120个(53.5%)农场的患病率在>0至<3%之间,一个农场的最高患病率为12.7%。总体而言,个体奶牛患病率为707/60455(1.2(95%可信区间=0.9 - 3.0)%),在受影响的农场中为707/41116(1.7(95%可信区间=1.4 - 2.1)%)。在受影响的奶牛中,268/707(37.9%)仅左蹄有病变,262/707(37.1%)仅右蹄有病变,177/707(25.0%)双蹄均有病变。K函数分析未显示有BDD农场的聚集证据。
牛趾间皮炎在调查的农场中广泛存在,但没有证据表明患病畜群存在聚集现象。受影响农场的个体奶牛患病率远低于其他地方的报道。
尽管个体奶牛患病率较低,但如果这些数据代表新西兰其他地区的情况,BDD可能很容易成为新西兰奶牛场的一个主要问题,正如在其他国家所观察到的那样。