Lu Mengfei, Lewis Cathryn M, Traylor Matthew
Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London, 8th Floor Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
SGDP Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8EF, UK.
BMC Med Genomics. 2017 Jun 19;10(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0283-0.
Rapid advances in scientific research have led to an increase in public awareness of genetic testing and pharmacogenetics. Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing companies, such as 23andMe, allow consumers to access their genetic information directly through an online service without the involvement of healthcare professionals. Here, we evaluate the clinical relevance of pharmacogenetic tests reported by 23andMe in their UK tests.
The research papers listed under each 23andMe report were evaluated, extracting information on effect size, sample size and ethnicity. A wider literature search was performed to provide a fuller assessment of the pharmacogenetic test and variants were matched to FDA recommendations. Additional evidence from CPIC guidelines, PharmGKB, and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group was reviewed to determine current clinical practice. The value of the tests across ethnic groups was determined, including information on linkage disequilibrium between the tested SNP and causal pharmacogenetic variant, where relevant.
23andMe offers 12 pharmacogenetic tests to their UK customers, some of which are in standard clinical practice, and others which are less widely applied. The clinical validity and clinical utility varies extensively between tests. The variants tested are likely to have different degrees of sensitivity due to different risk allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium patterns across populations. The clinical relevance depends on the ethnicity of the individual and variability of pharmacogenetic markers. Further research is required to determine causal variants and provide more complete assessment of drug response and side effects.
23andMe reports provide some useful pharmacogenetics information, mirroring clinical tests that are in standard use. Other tests are unspecific, providing limited guidance and may not be useful for patients without professional interpretation. Nevertheless, DTC companies like 23andMe act as a powerful intermediate step to integrate pharmacogenetic testing into clinical practice.
科学研究的迅速发展提高了公众对基因检测和药物遗传学的认识。像23andMe这样的直接面向消费者(DTC)的基因检测公司,使消费者能够通过在线服务直接获取自己的基因信息,而无需医疗保健专业人员的参与。在此,我们评估23andMe在其英国检测中报告的药物遗传学检测的临床相关性。
对23andMe每份报告下列出的研究论文进行评估,提取有关效应大小、样本量和种族的信息。进行了更广泛的文献检索,以对药物遗传学检测进行更全面的评估,并将变体与美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的建议进行匹配。审查了来自临床药物基因组学实施联盟(CPIC)指南、药物基因组学知识库(PharmGKB)和荷兰药物遗传学工作组的其他证据,以确定当前的临床实践。确定了不同种族群体中检测的价值,包括相关情况下检测的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)与因果药物遗传学变体之间的连锁不平衡信息。
23andMe向其英国客户提供12种药物遗传学检测,其中一些检测已在标准临床实践中应用,而其他检测的应用则不太广泛。不同检测之间的临床有效性和临床实用性差异很大。由于不同人群中风险等位基因频率和连锁不平衡模式不同,所检测的变体可能具有不同程度的敏感性。临床相关性取决于个体的种族和药物遗传学标记的变异性。需要进一步研究以确定因果变体,并对药物反应和副作用进行更全面的评估。
23andMe的报告提供了一些有用的药物遗传学信息,与标准使用的临床检测相似。其他检测不具有特异性,提供的指导有限,对于未经专业解读的患者可能没有用处。然而,像23andMe这样的DTC公司是将药物遗传学检测纳入临床实践的有力中间步骤。