O'Hanlon Claire E, Parthan Anju, Kruse Morgan, Cartier Shannon, Stollenwerk Bjorn, Jiang Yawen, Caloyeras John P, Crittenden Daria B, Barron Richard
Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, California; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.
Optum, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1276-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.348. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
The goal of this study was to assess and compare the potential clinical and economic value of emerging bone-forming agents using the only currently available agent, teriparatide, as a reference case in patients at high, near-term (imminent, 1- to 2-year) risk of osteoporotic fractures, extending to a lifetime horizon with sequenced antiresorptive agents for maintenance treatment.
Analyses were performed by using a Markov cohort model accounting for time-specific fracture protection effects of bone-forming agents followed by antiresorptive treatment with denosumab. The alternative bone-forming agent profiles were defined by using assumptions regarding the onset and total magnitude of protection against fractures with teriparatide. The model cohort comprised 70-year-old female patients with T scores below -2.5 and a previous vertebral fracture. Outcomes included clinical fractures, direct costs, and quality-adjusted life years. The simulated treatment strategies were compared by calculating their incremental "value" (net monetary benefit).
Improvements in the onset and magnitude of fracture protection (vs the teriparatide reference case) produced a net monetary benefit of $17,000,000 per 10,000 treated patients during the (1.5-year) bone-forming agent treatment period and $80,000,000 over a lifetime horizon that included 3.5 years of maintenance treatment with denosumab.
Incorporating time-specific fracture effects in the Markov cohort model allowed for estimation of a range of cost savings, quality-adjusted life years gained, and clinical fractures avoided at different levels of fracture protection onset and magnitude. Results provide a first estimate of the potential "value" new bone-forming agents (romosozumab and abaloparatide) may confer relative to teriparatide.
本研究的目的是评估并比较新型骨形成药物的潜在临床和经济价值,以目前唯一可用的药物特立帕肽作为对照,研究对象为近期(1至2年内)有骨质疏松性骨折高风险的患者,并通过序贯抗吸收药物进行维持治疗,将研究范围扩展至终身。
采用马尔可夫队列模型进行分析,该模型考虑了骨形成药物的时间特异性骨折保护作用,随后使用地诺单抗进行抗吸收治疗。通过对特立帕肽预防骨折的起效时间和总体效果进行假设,定义了替代骨形成药物的特征。模型队列包括70岁、T值低于-2.5且有过椎体骨折的女性患者。结局包括临床骨折、直接成本和质量调整生命年。通过计算其增量“价值”(净货币效益)来比较模拟治疗策略。
与特立帕肽对照相比,骨折保护的起效时间和效果得到改善,在(1.5年)骨形成药物治疗期间,每10000例接受治疗的患者净货币效益为17000000美元,在包括3.5年地诺单抗维持治疗的终身范围内为80000000美元。
在马尔可夫队列模型中纳入时间特异性骨折效应,可以估计在不同骨折保护起效时间和效果水平下节省的成本范围、获得的质量调整生命年以及避免的临床骨折。结果首次估计了新型骨形成药物(罗莫单抗和阿巴洛帕肽)相对于特立帕肽可能带来的潜在“价值”。