From the Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Can J Surg. 2019 Oct 1;62(5):347-355. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013018.
Many patients who sustain penetrating abdominal trauma can be managed nonoperatively. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) has published guidelines on selective nonoperative management (SNOM), and this approach is well established. The purpose of this study is to assess the management of penetrating abdominal trauma, including the selection of patients for SNOM and the use of this approach, at a Canadian level 1 trauma centre.
We used the Hamilton Health Sciences trauma registry to compile data on patients aged 16 years and older who sustained penetrating abdominal trauma from Jan. 1, 2011, to Dec. 31, 2017. Hemodynamically stable, nonperitonitic patients without evisceration or impalement were considered potentially eligible for SNOM. We compared the SNOM group of patients with the immediate operative (IOR) group. Our primary outcome was SNOM failure; secondary outcomes included length of stay, repeat imaging, computed tomography (CT) protocol, laparoscopy in left thoracoabdominal trauma, and nontherapeutic and negative laparotomies.
We included 191 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma; 123 underwent SNOM and 68 underwent IOR. Of the 68 patients in the IOR group, 4 underwent nontherapeutic laparotomies. Of the 123 patients in the SNOM group, this approach failed in 7 (5.7%). Patients who were successfully managed with SNOM had an average length of stay of 25.4 hours (7.9–43.0 h), with no repeat imaging in 34/35 (97.1%). Only 5 of the 47 patients with flank/back wounds had a CT scan that included luminal contrast. Only 3 of the 58 patients with left thoracoabdominal wounds underwent same-admission laparoscopy, all demonstrating diaphragmatic defects.
Our study demonstrates a high rate of compliance with the EAST SNOM guidelines, including minimal failure rate of SNOM and an efficient use of resources as demonstrated by reduced length of stay and minimal use of reimaging. We identified 2 opportunities for improvement: improved use of luminal contrast CT in patients with flank/back wounds and improved use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with left thoracoabdominal wounds.
许多穿透性腹部创伤患者可以接受非手术治疗。东部创伤外科学会 (EAST) 已经发布了选择性非手术治疗 (SNOM) 的指南,并且这种方法已经得到了很好的建立。本研究的目的是评估加拿大 1 级创伤中心穿透性腹部创伤的治疗方法,包括 SNOM 患者的选择和这种方法的应用。
我们使用汉密尔顿健康科学创伤登记处,汇编了 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间年龄在 16 岁及以上的穿透性腹部创伤患者的数据。血流动力学稳定、无腹膜炎且无内脏脱出或刺穿的非腹膜炎患者被认为有资格接受 SNOM。我们比较了 SNOM 组和即刻手术 (IOR) 组的患者。我们的主要结局是 SNOM 失败;次要结局包括住院时间、重复成像、计算机断层扫描 (CT) 方案、左胸腹创伤的腹腔镜检查以及非治疗性和阴性剖腹手术。
我们纳入了 191 例穿透性腹部创伤患者;123 例接受 SNOM,68 例接受 IOR。IOR 组的 68 例患者中,4 例接受了非治疗性剖腹手术。SNOM 组的 123 例患者中,7 例(5.7%)治疗失败。成功接受 SNOM 治疗的患者平均住院时间为 25.4 小时(7.9-43.0 小时),35/35 例(97.1%)无重复成像。只有 47 例腰背部伤口患者中有 5 例 CT 扫描包括管腔造影。58 例左侧胸腹创伤患者中只有 3 例在同一入院时进行了腹腔镜检查,所有患者均显示膈肌缺陷。
我们的研究表明,我们的研究表明,对 EAST SNOM 指南的遵循率很高,包括 SNOM 的低失败率和资源的有效利用,这表现为住院时间缩短和重复成像减少。我们发现了两个改进的机会:在腰背部伤口患者中更好地使用管腔造影 CT,在左侧胸腹创伤患者中更好地使用诊断性腹腔镜检查。