Suppr超能文献

测量重症监护病房的睡眠:对主观方法使用的批判性评估。

Measuring Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit: A Critical Appraisal of the Use of Subjective Methods.

机构信息

1 Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):751-760. doi: 10.1177/0885066617712197. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To collate and appraise the use of subjective measures to assess sleep in the intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN

A systematic search and critical review of the published literature.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Scopus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched using combinations of the key words "Sleep," "Critical Care," "Intensive Care," and "Sleep Disorders," and this was complemented by hand searching the most recent systematic reviews on related topics.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Papers were limited to non-gray English-language studies of the adult population, published in the last 10 years.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were the number and categorization of quantitative studies reporting measures of sleep, the number of participants for each data collection method, and a synthesis of related material to appraise the use of survey tools commonly used for sleep measurement in the ICU.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight papers reported quantitative empirical data collection on sleep, 17 of which used a primary method of subjective assessment of sleep by the patient or nurse. Thirteen methods of subjective sleep assessment were identified. Many of these tools lacked validity and reliability testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Research using questionnaires to assess sleep is commonplace in light of practical barriers to polysomnography or other measures of sleep. A methodologically sound approach to tool development and testing is crucial to gather meaningful data, and this robust approach was lacking in many cases. Further research measuring sleep subjectively in ICU should use the Richards Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, and researchers should maintain a commitment to transparency in describing methods.

摘要

目的

整理和评价使用主观测量方法评估重症监护病房(ICU)中的睡眠。

设计

对已发表文献进行系统搜索和批判性评价。

资料来源

使用“睡眠”、“重症监护”、“重症监护”和“睡眠障碍”等关键词对 Medline、Scopus 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature 进行了组合搜索,并辅以对相关主题的最新系统评价进行手工搜索。

研究入选标准

论文仅限于过去 10 年发表的非灰色英语、针对成年人群的研究。

主要结局指标

主要结局是报告睡眠测量定量研究的数量和分类、每种数据收集方法的参与者数量,以及对常用于 ICU 睡眠测量的调查工具的综合评估,以评估其使用情况。

结果

38 篇论文报告了关于睡眠的定量实证数据收集,其中 17 篇使用了患者或护士对睡眠进行主观评估的主要方法。确定了 13 种主观睡眠评估方法。其中许多工具缺乏有效性和可靠性测试。

结论

鉴于多导睡眠图或其他睡眠测量方法的实际障碍,使用问卷评估睡眠的研究很常见。开发和测试工具的方法学严谨方法对于收集有意义的数据至关重要,但在许多情况下,这种严谨的方法都缺乏。进一步在 ICU 中进行主观睡眠测量的研究应使用 Richards Campbell 睡眠问卷,研究人员应承诺在描述方法时保持透明。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验