Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Australia.
Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Australia.
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Nov;22(6):348-354. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12315. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
To describe sleep quality using repeated subjective assessment and the ongoing use of sleep-promoting interventions in intensive care. It is well known that the critically ill experience sleep disruption while receiving treatment in the intensive care unit. Both the measurement and promotion of sleep is challenging in the complex environment of intensive care unit. Repeated subjective assessment of patients' sleep in the intensive care unit and use of sleep-promoting interventions has not been widely reported. An observational study was conducted in a 58-bed adult intensive care unit. Sleep quality was assessed using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) each morning. intensive care unit audit sleep-promoting intervention data were compared to data obtained prior to the implementation of a sleep guideline. Patients answered open-ended questions about the facilitators and deterrents of their sleep in intensive care unit. The sample (n = 50) was predominately male (76%) with a mean age: 62.6±16.9 years. Sleep quality was assessed on 2 days or more for 21 patients. The majority of patients (98%) received sleep-promoting interventions. Sleep quality had not improved significantly since the guideline was first implemented. The mean Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire score was 47.9±24.1 mm. The main sleep deterrents were discomfort and noise. Frequently cited facilitators were nothing (i.e. nothing helped) and analgesia. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire was used on repeated occasions, and sleep-promoting interventions were used extensively. There was no evidence of improvement in sleep quality since the implementation of a sleep guideline. The use of the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire for the subjective self-assessment of sleep quality in intensive care unit patients and the implementation of simple-promoting interventions by intensive care unit clinicians is both feasible and may be the most practical way to assess sleep in the intensive care unit context.
描述使用反复主观评估和持续使用促进睡眠干预措施来改善重症监护患者的睡眠质量。众所周知,危重病患者在重症监护病房接受治疗时会经历睡眠中断。在重症监护病房的复杂环境中,对睡眠进行测量和促进都具有挑战性。在重症监护病房中反复对患者的睡眠进行主观评估并使用促进睡眠的干预措施尚未得到广泛报道。在一个 58 张成人重症监护病房进行了一项观察性研究。每天早上使用 Richards-Campbell 睡眠问卷(RCSQ)评估睡眠质量。重症监护病房审核的促进睡眠干预措施的数据与实施睡眠指南之前获得的数据进行了比较。患者回答了有关他们在重症监护病房睡眠的促进因素和阻碍因素的开放性问题。该样本(n=50)主要为男性(76%),平均年龄为 62.6±16.9 岁。有 21 名患者接受了 2 天或更长时间的睡眠质量评估。大多数患者(98%)接受了促进睡眠的干预措施。自指南首次实施以来,睡眠质量并未显著改善。Richards-Campbell 睡眠问卷的平均得分为 47.9±24.1 毫米。主要的睡眠障碍因素是不适和噪音。经常提到的促进因素是无(即无任何帮助)和镇痛。Richards-Campbell 睡眠问卷反复使用,促进睡眠的干预措施广泛使用。自实施睡眠指南以来,睡眠质量没有改善的证据。在重症监护病房患者中使用 Richards-Campbell 睡眠问卷进行主观自评睡眠质量,并由重症监护病房临床医生实施简单的促进睡眠干预措施,这既可行,也可能是在重症监护病房环境中评估睡眠的最实用方法。