Atterbury Kendall, Rowe Michael
Silver School of Social Work, New York University, NY.
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Jul;35(4):273-287. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2293. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
In this article, we address the issue of community mental health and the common good via an applied theory of citizenship to support the social inclusion, empowerment, and inclusion of persons diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. We begin by discussing citizenship, and the concept of the common good, in regard to historical conceptions of citizenship, including the historical exclusion of women, people of color, persons with mental illness, and others. We then review the development of our citizenship framework in response to the limitations of even the most innovative community mental health interventions, specifically the practice of mental health outreach to persons who are homeless. We review findings from three citizenship research studies - a community-level intervention, an individual- and group-level intervention, and development of an individual instrument of citizenship - along with brief comments on current citizenship research. We conclude with a discussion of the challenges of realizing both the individual and collective potential of, and challenges to, the citizenship framework in relation to current and future community mental health systems of care. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
在本文中,我们通过一种公民身份应用理论来探讨社区心理健康与共同利益问题,以支持被诊断患有精神疾病者的社会包容、赋权及融入。我们首先讨论公民身份以及共同利益的概念,涉及公民身份的历史观念,包括历史上对女性、有色人种、精神疾病患者及其他群体的排斥。然后,我们回顾了我们的公民身份框架的发展情况,以应对即使是最具创新性的社区心理健康干预措施所存在的局限性,特别是针对无家可归者的心理健康外展服务实践。我们回顾了三项公民身份研究的结果——一项社区层面的干预、一项个体和群体层面的干预以及一项个体公民身份工具的开发——并对当前的公民身份研究作了简要评论。最后,我们讨论了在当前及未来社区心理健康护理体系中,实现公民身份框架的个体和集体潜力以及面临的挑战所面临的挑战。版权所有© 2017约翰·威利父子有限公司。