Suppr超能文献

用于微创脊柱手术术中三维成像和导航的C型臂比较研究 第一部分:适用性和图像质量

Comparative Study of C-arms for Intraoperative 3-dimensional Imaging and Navigation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Part I: Applicability and Image Quality.

作者信息

Klingler Jan-Helge, Sircar Ronen, Scheiwe Christian, Kogias Evangelos, Volz Florian, Krüger Marie T, Hubbe Ulrich

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):276-284. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000186.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study compares 2 different 3-dimensional (3D) C-arm devices for intraoperative imaging and navigation with regard to clinical applicability and image quality.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Minimally invasive spine surgery requires intraoperative imaging techniques to adequately visualize the unexposed spine. For this purpose, mobile 3D C-arms became available along with the evolution of intraoperative navigation techniques.

METHODS

The C-arm devices Siremobil Iso-C 3D (Siemens) and Vision FD Vario 3D (Ziehm) perform an automated orbital rotation around the patient acquiring a 3D image set out of multiple successive fluoroscopic images. We report on technical specifications of the C-arms and our daily experience regarding clinical applicability. Furthermore, 5 spine surgeons evaluated blinded triplanar planes of 40 cervical, thoracic, and lumbar 3D scans that were obtained during routine surgery regarding usability for navigation. We assessed the delineation of cortical bone, artifacts, and overall image quality using a 0-10 numeric rating scale.

RESULTS

The Siremobil Iso-C 3D requires 128 seconds for its 190-degree scanning arc with equidistant isocenter. The Vision FD Vario 3D performs an elliptical scanning arc and completes its 135-degree scan in 64 seconds; furthermore, it features a flat panel detector and fully digital imaging. The smaller dimensions of the Vision FD Vario 3D made it easier to maneuver in the operating room compared with the more bulky Siremobil Iso-C 3D. With respect to image quality in cervical 3D scans, the Siremobil Iso-C 3D reached significantly higher scores in all categories. The Vision FD Vario 3D revealed less artifacts in lumbar 3D scans.

CONCLUSIONS

The Siremobil Iso-C 3D provides high-quality 3D scans in slender spine regions (eg, cervical spine), whereas the Vision FD Vario 3D appears to have advantages in the lumbar spine. Further evolution and novel devices are needed to optimize image quality and handling.

摘要

研究设计

这是一项回顾性分析。

目的

本研究比较两种不同的三维(3D)C型臂设备在术中成像和导航方面的临床适用性和图像质量。

背景数据总结

微创脊柱手术需要术中成像技术来充分显示未暴露的脊柱。为此,随着术中导航技术的发展,移动式3D C型臂应运而生。

方法

C型臂设备Siremobil Iso-C 3D(西门子)和Vision FD Vario 3D(齐默)围绕患者进行自动轨道旋转,从多个连续的荧光透视图像中获取一组3D图像。我们报告了C型臂的技术规格以及我们在临床适用性方面的日常经验。此外,5位脊柱外科医生对在常规手术中获得的40例颈椎、胸椎和腰椎3D扫描的盲法三平面进行了评估,以确定其导航可用性。我们使用0至10的数字评分量表评估皮质骨的清晰度、伪影和整体图像质量。

结果

Siremobil Iso-C 3D在等中心等距的情况下,其190度扫描弧需要128秒。Vision FD Vario 3D进行椭圆形扫描弧,64秒内完成135度扫描;此外,它配备了平板探测器和全数字成像。与更笨重的Siremobil Iso-C 3D相比,Vision FD Vario 3D较小的尺寸使其在手术室中更易于操作。在颈椎3D扫描的图像质量方面,Siremobil Iso-C 3D在所有类别中得分显著更高。Vision FD Vario 3D在腰椎3D扫描中显示出较少的伪影。

结论

Siremobil Iso-C 3D在细长的脊柱区域(如颈椎)提供高质量的3D扫描,而Vision FD Vario 3D在腰椎似乎具有优势。需要进一步发展和新型设备来优化图像质量和操作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验