Klingler Jan-Helge, Sircar Ronen, Scheiwe Christian, Kogias Evangelos, Volz Florian, Krüger Marie T, Hubbe Ulrich
Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):276-284. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000186.
This was a retrospective analysis.
This study compares 2 different 3-dimensional (3D) C-arm devices for intraoperative imaging and navigation with regard to clinical applicability and image quality.
Minimally invasive spine surgery requires intraoperative imaging techniques to adequately visualize the unexposed spine. For this purpose, mobile 3D C-arms became available along with the evolution of intraoperative navigation techniques.
The C-arm devices Siremobil Iso-C 3D (Siemens) and Vision FD Vario 3D (Ziehm) perform an automated orbital rotation around the patient acquiring a 3D image set out of multiple successive fluoroscopic images. We report on technical specifications of the C-arms and our daily experience regarding clinical applicability. Furthermore, 5 spine surgeons evaluated blinded triplanar planes of 40 cervical, thoracic, and lumbar 3D scans that were obtained during routine surgery regarding usability for navigation. We assessed the delineation of cortical bone, artifacts, and overall image quality using a 0-10 numeric rating scale.
The Siremobil Iso-C 3D requires 128 seconds for its 190-degree scanning arc with equidistant isocenter. The Vision FD Vario 3D performs an elliptical scanning arc and completes its 135-degree scan in 64 seconds; furthermore, it features a flat panel detector and fully digital imaging. The smaller dimensions of the Vision FD Vario 3D made it easier to maneuver in the operating room compared with the more bulky Siremobil Iso-C 3D. With respect to image quality in cervical 3D scans, the Siremobil Iso-C 3D reached significantly higher scores in all categories. The Vision FD Vario 3D revealed less artifacts in lumbar 3D scans.
The Siremobil Iso-C 3D provides high-quality 3D scans in slender spine regions (eg, cervical spine), whereas the Vision FD Vario 3D appears to have advantages in the lumbar spine. Further evolution and novel devices are needed to optimize image quality and handling.
这是一项回顾性分析。
本研究比较两种不同的三维(3D)C型臂设备在术中成像和导航方面的临床适用性和图像质量。
微创脊柱手术需要术中成像技术来充分显示未暴露的脊柱。为此,随着术中导航技术的发展,移动式3D C型臂应运而生。
C型臂设备Siremobil Iso-C 3D(西门子)和Vision FD Vario 3D(齐默)围绕患者进行自动轨道旋转,从多个连续的荧光透视图像中获取一组3D图像。我们报告了C型臂的技术规格以及我们在临床适用性方面的日常经验。此外,5位脊柱外科医生对在常规手术中获得的40例颈椎、胸椎和腰椎3D扫描的盲法三平面进行了评估,以确定其导航可用性。我们使用0至10的数字评分量表评估皮质骨的清晰度、伪影和整体图像质量。
Siremobil Iso-C 3D在等中心等距的情况下,其190度扫描弧需要128秒。Vision FD Vario 3D进行椭圆形扫描弧,64秒内完成135度扫描;此外,它配备了平板探测器和全数字成像。与更笨重的Siremobil Iso-C 3D相比,Vision FD Vario 3D较小的尺寸使其在手术室中更易于操作。在颈椎3D扫描的图像质量方面,Siremobil Iso-C 3D在所有类别中得分显著更高。Vision FD Vario 3D在腰椎3D扫描中显示出较少的伪影。
Siremobil Iso-C 3D在细长的脊柱区域(如颈椎)提供高质量的3D扫描,而Vision FD Vario 3D在腰椎似乎具有优势。需要进一步发展和新型设备来优化图像质量和操作。