Suppr超能文献

改善烧伤深度的组织学特征。

Improving the histologic characterization of burn depth.

作者信息

Gibson Angela L F, Bennett Daniel D, Taylor Lauren J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Cutan Pathol. 2017 Dec;44(12):998-1004. doi: 10.1111/cup.12991. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Visual assessment of burn wound appearance is the standard of care to determine the depth of thermal injury but often incorrectly predicts wound healing potential. Histologic evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained burn tissue is prone to subjectivity and is challenging for the novice. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) staining may offer a simplified and consistent technique to identify burn tissue viability.

METHODS

Thirty tissue samples were obtained from 6 patients undergoing surgical excision for clinically determined deep partial thickness or full thickness burns. Tissues were stained with H&E or LDH. Each specimen was scored by 3 individuals with varying levels of skill in histologic interpretation using a standardized checklist at 2 distinct time points.

RESULTS

Agreement within raters was highest for the expert rater and lowest for the novice; however, the LDH stained tissue method had improved agreement for an experienced burn surgeon and novice. Agreement between raters was greater for the LDH stained samples which were determined to have greater viability than the corresponding H&E section in 100% of samples scored by the expert and in 80% for the novice clinician.

CONCLUSION

LDH staining offers a more consistent measure of tissue viability that can be used by experienced and novice clinicians.

摘要

背景

通过视觉评估烧伤创面外观是确定热损伤深度的护理标准,但往往会错误地预测创面愈合潜力。苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色的烧伤组织的组织学评估容易受到主观因素影响,对新手来说具有挑战性。乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)染色可能提供一种简化且一致的技术来识别烧伤组织的活力。

方法

从6例因临床诊断为深Ⅱ度或Ⅲ度烧伤而接受手术切除的患者身上获取30个组织样本。组织用H&E或LDH染色。在2个不同时间点,由3名组织学解读技能水平不同的人员使用标准化检查表对每个标本进行评分。

结果

评分者之间的一致性在专家评分者中最高,在新手评分者中最低;然而,LDH染色组织法在经验丰富的烧伤外科医生和新手之间的一致性有所提高。对于LDH染色样本,评分者之间的一致性更高,专家评分的100%样本以及新手临床医生评分的80%样本中,LDH染色样本的活力均高于相应的H&E切片。

结论

LDH染色提供了一种更一致的组织活力测量方法,经验丰富的临床医生和新手都可以使用。

相似文献

1
Improving the histologic characterization of burn depth.改善烧伤深度的组织学特征。
J Cutan Pathol. 2017 Dec;44(12):998-1004. doi: 10.1111/cup.12991. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

6
Indeterminate-Depth Burn Injury-Exploring the Uncertainty.不确定深度烧伤损伤——探索不确定性。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:183-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.063. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验