Talwar Puneet, Grover Sandeep, Sinha Juhi, Chandna Puneet, Agarwal Rachna, Kushwaha Suman, Kukreti Ritushree
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB) Campus, New Delhi, India.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(1-2):25-34. doi: 10.1159/000477206. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with a complex multifactorial etiology. Here, we aim to identify a biomarker pool comprised of genetic variants and blood biomarkers as predictor of AD risk.
We performed a case-control study involving 108 cases and 159 non-demented healthy controls to examine the association of multiple biomarkers with AD risk.
The APOE genotyping revealed that ε4 allele frequency was significantly high (p value = 0.0001, OR = 2.66, 95% CI 1.58-4.46) in AD as compared to controls, whereas ε2 (p = 0.0430, OR = 0.29, CI 0.07-1.10) was overrepresented in controls. In biochemical assays, significant differences in levels of total copper, free copper, zinc, copper/zinc ratio, iron, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), leptin, and albumin were also observed. The AD risk score (ADRS) as a linear combination of 6 candidate markers involving age, education status, APOE ε4 allele, levels of iron, Cu/Zn ratio, and EGFR was created using stepwise linear discriminant analysis. The area under the ROC curve of the ADRS panel for predicting AD risk was significantly high (AUC = 0.84, p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.78-0.89, sensitivity = 70.0%, specificity = 83.8%) compared to individual parameters.
These findings support the multifactorial etiology of AD and demonstrate the ability of a panel involving 6 biomarkers to discriminate AD cases from non-demented healthy controls.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种病因复杂、多因素的进行性神经退行性疾病。在此,我们旨在确定一个由基因变异和血液生物标志物组成的生物标志物池,作为AD风险的预测指标。
我们进行了一项病例对照研究,涉及108例病例和159名非痴呆健康对照,以检查多种生物标志物与AD风险的关联。
APOE基因分型显示,与对照组相比,AD患者中ε4等位基因频率显著较高(p值 = 0.0001,OR = 2.66,95% CI 1.58 - 4.46),而ε2(p = 0.0430,OR = 0.29,CI 0.07 - 1.10)在对照组中占比过高。在生化检测中,还观察到总铜、游离铜、锌、铜/锌比值、铁、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、瘦素和白蛋白水平存在显著差异。使用逐步线性判别分析创建了AD风险评分(ADRS),它是年龄、教育状况、APOE ε4等位基因、铁水平、铜/锌比值和EGFR这6个候选标志物的线性组合。与单个参数相比,用于预测AD风险的ADRS面板的ROC曲线下面积显著较高(AUC = 0.84,p < 0.0001,95% CI 0.78 - 0.89,敏感性 = 70.0%,特异性 = 83.8%)。
这些发现支持了AD的多因素病因,并证明了一个包含6种生物标志物的面板能够区分AD病例与非痴呆健康对照。