• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国埃塞克斯的全英医疗服务(NHS) funded 眼部检查参与度的地理不平等:基于小区域数据的泊松模型。

Geographical inequalities in uptake of NHS funded eye examinations: Poisson modelling of small-area data for Essex, UK.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Public Health, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Bradford School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Jun 1;40(2):e171-e179. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx058.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdx058
PMID:28633479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6051445/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Small-area analysis of National Health Service (NHS)-funded sight test uptake in Leeds showed significant inequalities in access among people aged <16 or ≥60.

METHODS

Data were extracted from 604 126 valid General Ophthalmic Services (GOS)1 claim forms for eye examinations for Essex residents between October 2013 and July 2015. Expected GOS1 uptake for each lower super output area was based on England annual uptake. Poisson regression modelling explored associations in GOS1 uptake ratio with deprivation.

RESULTS

People aged ≥60 or <16 living in the least deprived quintile were 15% and 26%, respectively, more likely to have an NHS funded eye examination than the most deprived quintile, although all are equally entitled. GOS1 uptake is higher in the more deprived quintiles among 16-59-year old, as means tested social benefits are the main eligibility criteria in this age-group. Inequalities were also observed at local authority level.

CONCLUSIONS

Inequalities in access among people ≥60 years were not as large as those reported in Leeds, although inequalities in <16-year old were similar. However, demonstrable inequalities in this data set over a longer time period and a larger and more diverse area than Leeds, reinforce the argument that interventions are needed to address eye examination uptake inequalities.

摘要

背景

利兹地区国民保健服务(NHS)资助的视力检查接受情况的小范围分析显示,16 岁以下或 60 岁以上人群的就诊机会存在显著差异。

方法

从 2013 年 10 月至 2015 年 7 月期间,埃塞尔郡居民的 604126 份有效一般眼科服务(GOS)1 检查申请表格中提取数据。每个较低的超级输出区域的预期 GOS1 接受率基于英格兰的年度接受率。泊松回归模型探索了 GOS1 接受率与贫困程度之间的关联。

结果

在最不贫困的五分之一中,年龄在 60 岁及以上或<16 岁的人群接受 NHS 资助的眼部检查的可能性分别比最贫困的五分之一高出 15%和 26%,尽管所有人都有平等的权利。在 16-59 岁的人群中,在较贫困的五分之一中,GOS1 的接受率更高,因为这一年龄组的主要资格标准是经济状况调查的社会福利。在地方当局一级也观察到了不平等现象。

结论

60 岁以上人群的就诊机会不平等程度不如利兹报道的那么大,尽管<16 岁人群的不平等程度相似。然而,在这个数据集上,更长的时间跨度和更大、更多样化的地区比利兹报告的不平等现象更明显,这加强了需要采取干预措施来解决眼部检查接受不平等的论点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5489/6051445/9a04c8674f80/fdx058f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5489/6051445/715e3fb695d3/fdx058f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5489/6051445/9a04c8674f80/fdx058f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5489/6051445/715e3fb695d3/fdx058f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5489/6051445/9a04c8674f80/fdx058f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Geographical inequalities in uptake of NHS funded eye examinations: Poisson modelling of small-area data for Essex, UK.英国埃塞克斯的全英医疗服务(NHS) funded 眼部检查参与度的地理不平等:基于小区域数据的泊松模型。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Jun 1;40(2):e171-e179. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx058.
2
Geographical inequalities in uptake of NHS-funded eye examinations: small area analysis of Leeds, UK.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)资助的眼部检查在接受程度上的地理不平等:英国利兹市的小区域分析
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Jun;37(2):337-45. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu039. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
3
Addressing inequalities in eye health with subsidies and increased fees for General Ophthalmic Services in socio-economically deprived communities: a sensitivity analysis.用补贴和增加社会经济贫困社区一般眼科服务费用的方式解决眼健康不平等问题:敏感性分析。
Public Health. 2015 Feb;129(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
4
Socioeconomic Status and Vision Care Services in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Cohort Study.加拿大安大略省的社会经济地位与眼科保健服务:基于人群的队列研究。
J Pediatr. 2022 Feb;241:212-220.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
Occurrence of fertility problems presenting to primary care: population-level estimates of clinical burden and socioeconomic inequalities across the UK.初级保健中出现的生育问题:英国临床负担和社会经济不平等的人群水平估计。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):960-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des451. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
6
Why is the General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) Contract that underpins primary eye care in the U.K. contrary to the public health interest?为何支撑英国初级眼保健的综合眼科服务(GOS)合同有悖于公共卫生利益?
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;99(7):888-92. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305345. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
7
A survey of the availability of state-funded primary eye care in the UK for the very young and very old.一项关于英国国家资助的针对婴幼儿和老年人的初级眼科护理可及性的调查。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 Sep;27(5):473-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00506.x.
8
NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes.英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查:一项关于接受率和结果公平性的横断面观察研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3027-8.
9
Waiting times and socioeconomic status: evidence from England.等候时间与社会经济地位:来自英格兰的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(9):1331-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.049. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
10
Inequalities in availability of National Health Service general dental practitioners in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士国民保健服务体系中普通牙科医生可及性的不平等现象。
Br Dent J. 2001 May 26;190(10):548-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801032.

引用本文的文献

1
Deprivation and NHS General Ophthalmic Service sight testing activity in England in 2022-2023.2022 - 2023年英格兰地区的贫困状况与国民医疗服务体系普通眼科服务视力检测活动
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 Jan;45(1):294-300. doi: 10.1111/opo.13399. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
A prospective evaluation of the clinical safety and effectiveness of a COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service across five areas in England.一项针对英格兰五个地区 COVID-19 紧急眼科服务的临床安全性和有效性的前瞻性评估。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Jan;42(1):94-109. doi: 10.1111/opo.12916. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Referrals from community optometrists to the hospital eye service in Scotland and England.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing inequalities in eye health with subsidies and increased fees for General Ophthalmic Services in socio-economically deprived communities: a sensitivity analysis.用补贴和增加社会经济贫困社区一般眼科服务费用的方式解决眼健康不平等问题:敏感性分析。
Public Health. 2015 Feb;129(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
2
Why is the General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) Contract that underpins primary eye care in the U.K. contrary to the public health interest?为何支撑英国初级眼保健的综合眼科服务(GOS)合同有悖于公共卫生利益?
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;99(7):888-92. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305345. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
3
苏格兰和英格兰社区验光师向医院眼科服务转诊的情况。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Sep;36(9):1754-1760. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01728-2. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
4
Exploring the effect of optometrist practice type on NHS funded sight test outcome.探讨视光师执业类型对国民保健制度资助的视力检查结果的影响。
J Optom. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
5
'It's too late'. Is it really? Considerations for amblyopia treatment in older children.“太晚了”。真的是这样吗?大龄儿童弱视治疗的相关考量。
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 19;11:2515841419857379. doi: 10.1177/2515841419857379. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
Geographical inequalities in uptake of NHS-funded eye examinations: small area analysis of Leeds, UK.
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)资助的眼部检查在接受程度上的地理不平等:英国利兹市的小区域分析
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Jun;37(2):337-45. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu039. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
4
Improving access to optometry services for people at risk of preventable sight loss: a qualitative study in five UK locations.改善有可预防视力丧失风险人群获得验光服务的情况:英国五个地区的定性研究
J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Dec;36(4):667-73. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt130. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
5
Why don't older adults in England go to have their eyes examined?为什么英格兰的老年人不去检查眼睛?
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jan;34(1):38-45. doi: 10.1111/opo.12100.
6
Why don't younger adults in England go to have their eyes examined?为什么英格兰的年轻人不去检查眼睛?
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jan;34(1):30-7. doi: 10.1111/opo.12099.
7
Area deprivation, individual socioeconomic status and low vision in the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study.区域贫困、个体社会经济地位与 EPIC-Norfolk 眼研究中的低视力
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):204-10. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203265. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
8
Cost implications, deprivation and geodemographic segmentation analysis of non-attenders (DNA) in an established diabetic retinopathy screening programme.在一项成熟的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查项目中,未参与者(DNA)的成本影响、贫困状况及地理人口细分分析
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2012 Oct-Dec;6(4):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
9
Geographical variation in certification rates of blindness and sight impairment in England, 2008-2009.英格兰 2008-2009 年盲和视力损伤认证率的地域差异。
BMJ Open. 2012 Nov 19;2(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001496. Print 2012.
10
Utilisation of eye-care services: the effect of Scotland's free eye examination policy.眼科保健服务的利用:苏格兰免费眼科检查政策的影响。
Health Policy. 2012 Dec;108(2-3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 11.