Suppr超能文献

美国128家退伍军人事务医疗中心社区获得性肺炎住院患者中,经验性抗菌覆盖范围与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌检测率的差异

Variation in Empiric Coverage Versus Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Hospitalizations for Community-Onset Pneumonia Across 128 US Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

作者信息

Jones Barbara E, Brown Kevin Antoine, Jones Makoto M, Huttner Benedikt D, Greene Tom, Sauer Brian C, Madaras-Kelly Karl, Rubin Michael A, Bidwell Goetz Matthew, Samore Matthew H

机构信息

1VA Salt Lake City IDEAS Center,VA Salt Lake City Health Care System,Salt Lake City,Utah.

3Division of Epidemiology,University of Utah,Salt Lake City,Utah.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;38(8):937-944. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.98. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine variation in antibiotic coverage and detection of resistant pathogens in community-onset pneumonia. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING A total of 128 hospitals in the Veterans Affairs health system. PARTICIPANTS Hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of pneumonia from 2009 through 2010. METHODS We examined proportions of hospitalizations with empiric antibiotic coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAER) and with initial detection in blood or respiratory cultures. We compared lowest- versus highest-decile hospitals, and we estimated adjusted probabilities (AP) for patient- and hospital-level factors predicting coverage and detection using hierarchical regression modeling. RESULTS Among 38,473 hospitalizations, empiric coverage varied widely across hospitals (MRSA lowest vs highest, 8.2% vs 42.0%; PAER lowest vs highest, 13.9% vs 44.4%). Detection rates also varied (MRSA lowest vs highest, 0.5% vs 3.6%; PAER lowest vs highest, 0.6% vs 3.7%). Whereas coverage was greatest among patients with recent hospitalizations (AP for anti-MRSA, 54%; AP for anti-PAER, 59%) and long-term care (AP for anti-MRSA, 60%; AP for anti-PAER, 66%), detection was greatest in patients with a previous history of a positive culture (AP for MRSA, 7.9%; AP for PAER, 11.9%) and in hospitals with a high prevalence of the organism in pneumonia (AP for MRSA, 3.9%; AP for PAER, 3.2%). Low hospital complexity and rural setting were strong negative predictors of coverage but not of detection. CONCLUSIONS Hospitals demonstrated widespread variation in both coverage and detection of MRSA and PAER, but probability of coverage correlated poorly with probability of detection. Factors associated with empiric coverage (eg, healthcare exposure) were different from those associated with detection (eg, microbiology history). Providing microbiology data during empiric antibiotic decision making could better align coverage to risk for resistant pathogens and could promote more judicious use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:937-944.

摘要

目的 研究社区获得性肺炎中抗生素覆盖范围及耐药病原体检测情况的差异。设计 横断面研究。地点 退伍军人事务卫生系统中的128家医院。参与者 2009年至2010年以肺炎为主要诊断的住院患者。方法 我们检查了对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和铜绿假单胞菌(PAER)进行经验性抗生素覆盖以及在血液或呼吸道培养物中进行初始检测的住院患者比例。我们比较了十分位数最低与最高的医院,并使用分层回归模型估计了预测覆盖范围和检测的患者及医院层面因素的调整概率(AP)。结果 在38473例住院患者中,各医院的经验性覆盖范围差异很大(MRSA最低与最高,8.2%对42.0%;PAER最低与最高,13.9%对44.4%)。检测率也有所不同(MRSA最低与最高,0.5%对3.6%;PAER最低与最高,0.6%对3.7%)。近期住院患者(抗MRSA的AP为54%;抗PAER的AP为59%)和长期护理患者(抗MRSA的AP为60%;抗PAER的AP为66%)的覆盖范围最大,而既往培养结果为阳性的患者(MRSA的AP为7.9%;PAER的AP为11.9%)以及肺炎中该病原体患病率高的医院(MRSA的AP为3.9%;PAER的AP为3.2%)的检测率最高。医院复杂性低和地处农村是覆盖范围的有力负预测因素,但不是检测的负预测因素。结论 医院在MRSA和PAER的覆盖范围及检测方面均存在广泛差异,但覆盖概率与检测概率的相关性较差。与经验性覆盖相关的因素(如医疗保健暴露)与与检测相关的因素(如微生物学病史)不同。在经验性抗生素决策过程中提供微生物学数据可以使覆盖范围更好地与耐药病原体风险相匹配,并可以促进更明智地使用广谱抗生素。《感染控制与医院流行病学》2017年;38:937 - 944。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验