• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定制缝线纽扣组件治疗踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的24个月随访

A 24-Month Follow-Up of a Custom-Made Suture-Button Assembly for Syndesmotic Injuries of the Ankle.

作者信息

Imam Mohamed A, Matthana Ahmed, Kim Ji Wan, Nabil Mohamed

机构信息

Senior Lecturer and Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Senior Lecturer and Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Jul-Aug;56(4):744-747. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.02.010.

DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2017.02.010
PMID:28633770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7111150/
Abstract

In the present retrospective analysis, we introduce a custom suture-button fixation device for acute ankle syndesmotic injuries that allows for early weightbearing without another planned operation for hardware removal. We evaluated 87 consecutive ankles in 87 patients (49 males [56.32%] and 38 females [43.68%]). Of the 87 patients, 15 (17.24%) withdrew or were lost to follow-up, leaving 72 patients (82.76%) in the present study. Their mean age was 35.2 (range 17 to 67) years. Nineteen patients (26.39%) presented with a pure syndesmotic disruption, and 53 (73.61%) had associated malleolar fractures. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale score improved significantly from 31.2 ± 4.2 preoperatively to 88.5 ± 5.3 at an average of 24 months postoperatively (p < .0043). Revision was undertaken because of implant failure in 4 ankles (5.56%). Two revisions (2.78%) were performed in 2 ankles because of early weightbearing in the first 2 weeks after surgery. The third patient (1.39%) underwent revision at 5 weeks postoperatively. This syndesmotic reduction failure was attributed to failure of the threads, which was noted at the second surgery. The fourth patient (1.39%), a 66-year-old male, underwent revision at 5 months postoperatively because of persistent infection. An 18-month postoperative radiograph was available for all patients. The medial clear space had significantly decreased, from 8.2 ± 3.1 mm preoperatively to 3.5 ± 2.2 mm at 18 months postoperatively (p < .0344). Likewise, the tibiofibular clear space had decreased significantly, from a mean of 8.8 ± 3.7 mm preoperatively to a mean of 3.7 ± 2.2 mm at 18 months postoperatively (p < .0322). In conclusion, suture-button fixation described in the present report delivered satisfactory functional outcomes and anatomic reduction at minimum of 18 months after surgery.

摘要

在本次回顾性分析中,我们介绍了一种用于急性踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的定制缝线纽扣固定装置,该装置可实现早期负重,且无需另行计划手术取出内固定物。我们评估了87例患者的87个连续踝关节(49例男性[56.32%],38例女性[43.68%])。87例患者中,15例(17.24%)退出或失访,本研究中剩余72例患者(82.76%)。他们的平均年龄为35.2岁(范围17至67岁)。19例患者(26.39%)表现为单纯下胫腓联合损伤,53例(73.61%)伴有踝关节骨折。美国矫形足踝协会评分从术前的31.2±4.2显著提高至术后平均24个月时的88.5±5.3(p<.0043)。4个踝关节(5.56%)因植入物失败而进行了翻修。2个踝关节(2.78%)在术后前2周因早期负重进行了2次翻修。第3例患者(1.39%)在术后5周进行了翻修。这种下胫腓联合复位失败归因于缝线失败,这在第二次手术时被发现。第4例患者(1.39%),一名66岁男性,因持续感染在术后5个月进行了翻修。所有患者均有术后18个月的X线片。内侧间隙显著减小,从术前的8.2±3.1mm降至术后18个月时的3.5±2.2mm(p<.0344)。同样,胫腓间隙也显著减小,从术前平均8.8±3.7mm降至术后18个月时平均3.7±2.2mm(p<.0322)。总之,本报告中描述的缝线纽扣固定在术后至少18个月时提供了满意的功能结果和解剖复位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d1/7111150/87fdd4884ddd/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d1/7111150/87fdd4884ddd/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d1/7111150/87fdd4884ddd/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
A 24-Month Follow-Up of a Custom-Made Suture-Button Assembly for Syndesmotic Injuries of the Ankle.定制缝线纽扣组件治疗踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的24个月随访
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Jul-Aug;56(4):744-747. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.02.010.
2
Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series.Weber C型踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤的钛缆固定:一项多中心病例系列研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 May;27(4):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1882-8. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
3
The Clinical Efficacy of Suture-Button Fixation and Trans-Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fracture Combined With Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Retrospective Study.缝线纽扣固定与经联合钉固定治疗合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jan-Feb;61(1):143-148. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
4
Maintenance of reduction with suture button fixation devices for ankle syndesmosis repair.使用缝线纽扣固定装置维持踝关节下胫腓联合修复的复位情况。
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jun;36(6):679-84. doi: 10.1177/1071100715571631. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
5
Suture-button Versus Screw Fixation in Adolescent Syndesmotic Injuries: Functional Outcomes and Maintenance of Reduction.纽扣缝线与螺钉固定治疗青少年下胫腓联合损伤:功能结果和复位维持。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jul 1;41(6):e427-e432. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001803.
6
Changes in the Syndesmotic Reduction After Syndesmotic Suture-Button Fixation for Ankle Malleolar Fractures: 1-Year Longitudinal Evaluations Using Computed Tomography.下胫腓联合螺钉固定术后下胫腓联合复位变化的 1 年纵向 CT 评估:踝关节骨折
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Oct;42(10):1270-1276. doi: 10.1177/10711007211008518. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
Injury mechanism affects the stability of suture-button syndesmosis fixation.损伤机制影响缝合纽扣联合固定的稳定性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Dec 10;15(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02141-3.
8
Investigating the Radiological Outcomes of Syndesmosis Injuries in Ankle Fracture Patients After Suture Button Fixation.探讨缝合纽扣固定后踝关节骨折患者下胫腓联合损伤的放射学结果。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr;61(2):350-354. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Treatment of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Rupture: Suture-Button Fixation Versus Cortical Screw Fixation.关于伴有下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折治疗的系统评价与Meta分析:缝线纽扣固定与皮质骨螺钉固定的比较
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):946-953. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.006.
10
Comparison of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.缝合钉固定与下胫腓联合螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Disclosed Industry Funding Does Not Increase Positive Outcomes in Studies on Suture Button Fixation for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.已披露的行业资助并不会增加踝关节下胫腓联合损伤缝线纽扣固定术研究的积极结果:一项系统评价。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Jun 19;10(2):24730114251341305. doi: 10.1177/24730114251341305. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Outcome of flexible fixation for acute isolated syndesmotic injuries.急性单纯性下胫腓联合损伤的弹性固定治疗结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 3;25(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07849-5.
3
A new type of elastic fixation, using an encircling and binding technique, for tibiofibular syndesmosis stabilization: comparison to traditional cortical screw fixation.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Anatomic Risk During Syndesmotic Stabilization With the Suture Button Technique.采用缝线纽扣技术进行下胫腓联合稳定时的解剖学风险评估
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Sep-Oct;54(5):917-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 2.
2
A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较TightRope和下胫腓联合螺钉固定在下胫腓联合复位准确性及维持方面的效果,采用双侧计算机断层扫描进行评估。
Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
3
一种新型的弹性固定方式,采用环绕捆绑技术,用于胫腓联合固定:与传统皮质螺钉固定的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Apr 3;18(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03579-x.
4
Comparison of Suture Button and Syndesmotic Screw for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.缝线纽扣与下胫腓螺钉治疗踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的比较:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jan 5;11(1):23259671221127665. doi: 10.1177/23259671221127665. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
The evaluation of artificial talus implant on ankle joint contact characteristics: a finite element study based on four subjects.基于四位受试者的有限元研究:人工距骨植入物对踝关节接触特性的评估。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Apr;60(4):1139-1158. doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02527-x. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
Osteomyelitis after TightRope(®) fixation of the ankle syndesmosis: a case report and review of the literature.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;54(1):130-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.09.041. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
4
A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture.一项前瞻性随机多中心试验,比较采用静态或动态植入物手术治疗急性踝关节下胫腓联合韧带断裂患者的临床结局。
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 May;29(5):216-23. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000245.
5
Does the Arthrex TightRope® provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? A 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes® in 37 patients.Arthrex TightRope®能否维持胫腓下联合的稳定性?对37例患者使用的64根TightRope®进行的2年随访。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;52(5):563-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique.缝线纽扣踝关节联合固定术改良手术技术相关并发症。
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Sep;33(9):717-21. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0717.
7
Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair.急性下胫腓联合损伤:缝线纽扣与下胫腓联合螺钉修复的系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2012 Jun;36(6):1199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1500-2. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
8
Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification.踝关节联合损伤的钢丝固定:临床结果、并发症和技术改良。
Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):838-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
9
Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.缝钉修复下胫腓联合远侧部的疗效。
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Mar;32(3):250-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0250.
10
Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis.缝线纽扣与螺钉固定距骨下关节:生物力学分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Jan;31(1):69-75. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0069.