• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缝钉修复下胫腓联合远侧部的疗效。

Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.

机构信息

Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA 02462, USA.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Mar;32(3):250-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0250.

DOI:10.3113/FAI.2011.0250
PMID:21477543
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, a suture button device has been advocated as a simple and effective method of repairing the syndesmosis. Proponents of the device have cited earlier weightbearing and elimination of the need for device removal as potential advantages over metallic screws. However, the available reports generally have short followup. With longer followup, some concerns about the suture button device have surfaced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of 24 patients with acute injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis who were treated with suture button fixation. Average followup was 20 months. The primary outcomes measure was the AOFAS ankle hindfoot score. Secondary outcomes measures included a calibrated measurement of the tibiofibular clear space and tibiofibular overlap.

RESULTS

The average AOFAS score was 94 points. Syndesmotic parameters returned to normal after surgery and remained normal throughout the followup period. One in four patients required removal of the suture endobutton device due to local irritation or lack of motion. Osteolysis of the bone and subsidence of the device into the bone was observed in four patients. Three patients developed heterotopic ossification within the syndesmotic ligament, one mild, one moderate, and one who had a nearly complete syndesmotic fusion.

CONCLUSION

The suture button device is an effective way to repair the syndesmosis. In our series, the reduction of the syndesmosis was maintained throughout the followup period. However, reoperation for device removal was more common than anticipated. Osteolysis of the bone near the implant and subsidence of the device may occur.

摘要

背景

最近,缝线纽扣装置已被提倡作为一种修复下胫腓联合的简单有效方法。该装置的支持者引用了更早的负重和避免需要取出装置作为潜在的优势超过金属螺钉。然而,现有的报告通常随访时间较短。随着更长时间的随访,缝线纽扣装置出现了一些令人担忧的问题。

材料和方法

我们回顾了 24 例急性下胫腓联合损伤患者采用缝线纽扣固定治疗的临床和影像学结果。平均随访时间为 20 个月。主要的结局测量指标是 AOFAS 踝关节后足评分。次要的结局测量指标包括胫腓骨间隙的校准测量和胫腓骨重叠。

结果

平均 AOFAS 评分为 94 分。术后下胫腓联合参数恢复正常,随访期间一直正常。四分之一的患者因局部刺激或运动受限需要取出缝线纽扣装置。四名患者观察到骨溶解和装置下沉到骨中。三名患者在下胫腓联合韧带上出现异位骨化,一名轻度,一名中度,一名几乎完全融合。

结论

缝线纽扣装置是修复下胫腓联合的有效方法。在我们的系列中,下胫腓联合的复位在整个随访期间得到了维持。然而,需要手术取出装置的再手术比预期的更常见。植入物附近的骨质溶解和装置下沉可能发生。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.缝钉修复下胫腓联合远侧部的疗效。
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Mar;32(3):250-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0250.
2
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.缝线纽扣与下胫腓螺钉治疗下胫腓联合损伤的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7.
3
Comparison of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.缝合钉固定与下胫腓联合螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
4
Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair.急性下胫腓联合损伤:缝线纽扣与下胫腓联合螺钉修复的系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2012 Jun;36(6):1199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1500-2. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
5
Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model.在尸体模型中,对比螺钉与缝线纽扣固定后关节镜测量下的下胫腓联合稳定性。
Injury. 2017 Nov;48(11):2433-2437. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.066. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries.下胫腓联合损伤中缝线纽扣与螺钉固定技术复位准确性的评估
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Dec;37(12):1317-1325. doi: 10.1177/1071100716661221. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
7
Maintenance of reduction with suture button fixation devices for ankle syndesmosis repair.使用缝线纽扣固定装置维持踝关节下胫腓联合修复的复位情况。
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jun;36(6):679-84. doi: 10.1177/1071100715571631. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Does the Arthrex TightRope® provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? A 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes® in 37 patients.Arthrex TightRope®能否维持胫腓下联合的稳定性?对37例患者使用的64根TightRope®进行的2年随访。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;52(5):563-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
9
The Clinical Efficacy of Suture-Button Fixation and Trans-Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fracture Combined With Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Retrospective Study.缝线纽扣固定与经联合钉固定治疗合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jan-Feb;61(1):143-148. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
[Does removal of the syndesmotic screw improve clinical results of operative treatment of ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmosis injury?].[去除下胫腓螺钉是否能改善合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折手术治疗的临床效果?]
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2010 May-Jun;75(3):143-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Disclosed Industry Funding Does Not Increase Positive Outcomes in Studies on Suture Button Fixation for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.已披露的行业资助并不会增加踝关节下胫腓联合损伤缝线纽扣固定术研究的积极结果:一项系统评价。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Jun 19;10(2):24730114251341305. doi: 10.1177/24730114251341305. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
A Prospective Study on Fixation of Syndesmotic Ankle Injury: Tight Rope Versus Screw Fixation.下胫腓联合踝关节损伤固定的前瞻性研究:Tight Rope与螺钉固定对比
Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67172. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67172. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Value of arthroscopy in the management of acute lesions of the distal tibiofibular joint.
关节镜在处理下胫腓联合急性损伤中的价值。
Int Orthop. 2024 Sep;48(9):2439-2443. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06222-4. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
Dynamic Fixation versus Static Screw Fixation for Syndesmosis Injuries in Pronation External Rotation Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Case Control Study.旋前外旋型踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤的动力固定与静态螺钉固定:一项回顾性病例对照研究
Malays Orthop J. 2023 Nov;17(3):48-58. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2311.008.
5
All-suture fixation of syndesmotic injuries: a case series.全缝线固定踝关节联合损伤:病例系列。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Apr;34(3):1279-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03797-3. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
6
Short and Middle Functional Outcome in the Static vs. Dynamic Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries in Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Case Series Study.踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤静态与动态固定的短期和中期功能结果:一项回顾性病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 May 24;12(11):3637. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113637.
7
A new type of elastic fixation, using an encircling and binding technique, for tibiofibular syndesmosis stabilization: comparison to traditional cortical screw fixation.一种新型的弹性固定方式,采用环绕捆绑技术,用于胫腓联合固定:与传统皮质螺钉固定的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Apr 3;18(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03579-x.
8
A New Method of Nice Knot Elastic Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury.新型跟腓联合损伤的 Nice 结弹性固定方法
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):785-792. doi: 10.1111/os.13635. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
9
Ankle fractures of the geriatric patient: a narrative review.老年患者的踝关节骨折:一项叙述性综述。
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Jan 27;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0082.
10
Suture Button versus Screw Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Injury and Expected Value Decision Analysis.用于胫腓骨远端损伤的缝线纽扣与螺钉固定及期望值决策分析
Cureus. 2021 Nov 25;13(11):e19890. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19890. eCollection 2021 Nov.