Allen Alexander, Barron Todd, Mo Ashley, Tangel Richard, Linde Ruth, Grim Rodney, Mingle John, Deibert Ellen
Division of Internal Medicine, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Wellspan, Department of Neurosciences, York, PA, USA.
Neurohospitalist. 2017 Jul;7(3):127-131. doi: 10.1177/1941874416684456. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
Despite advances in stroke care, readmission rates for patients with ischemic stroke remain high. Although factors such as age, diabetes, and continuous use of antiplatelet agents have been found to predict readmission rates, the impact of after-hospital care has not been examined.
The present study reviewed the charts of 416 patients with acute ischemic stroke and recorded stroke-related comorbidities, neurology follow-up within 21 days, readmission at 0 to 30 days, readmission at 31 to 90 days, and any reasons for readmission.
For those readmitted within 0 to 30 days, reasons for readmission were other medical conditions (62.5%), recurrent stroke (30.4%), and elective procedure (7.1%). For those readmitted within 31 to 90 days, reasons for readmission were other medical conditions (62.3%), recurrent stroke (15.1%), and elective procedure (22.6%). There was no significant relationship between being evaluated within 21 days and readmission at 0 to 30 or 31 to 90 days. However, those who did have a neurology follow-up at any point in time had a lower readmission rate of 10.6% compared to those who never came back (19.2%, = .017). Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes had a significantly higher likelihood of readmission within 0 to 30 days.
The present study suggests that neurology follow-up at any point in time for patients with acute ischemic stroke may reduce short-term readmissions, but special attention to optimizing management of other underlying medical conditions, coronary artery disease, or diabetes may also help reduce overall readmissions. Patients with stroke, therefore, may benefit from a follow-up with both the primary care and neurology in a coordinated fashion to prevent early readmissions at 30 days.
尽管在中风护理方面取得了进展,但缺血性中风患者的再入院率仍然很高。虽然年龄、糖尿病和持续使用抗血小板药物等因素已被发现可预测再入院率,但出院后护理的影响尚未得到研究。
本研究回顾了416例急性缺血性中风患者的病历,记录了中风相关的合并症、21天内的神经科随访、0至30天的再入院情况、31至90天的再入院情况以及任何再入院原因。
对于那些在0至30天内再入院的患者,再入院原因是其他医疗状况(62.5%)、复发性中风(30.4%)和择期手术(7.1%)。对于那些在31至90天内再入院的患者,再入院原因是其他医疗状况(62.3%)、复发性中风(15.1%)和择期手术(22.6%)。在21天内接受评估与0至30天或31至90天的再入院之间没有显著关系。然而,在任何时间点进行过神经科随访的患者再入院率为10.6%,低于从未回来复诊的患者(19.2%,P = 0.017)。患有冠状动脉疾病和糖尿病的患者在0至30天内再入院的可能性显著更高。
本研究表明,急性缺血性中风患者在任何时间点进行神经科随访可能会降低短期再入院率,但特别关注优化其他基础医疗状况、冠状动脉疾病或糖尿病的管理也可能有助于降低总体再入院率。因此,中风患者可能受益于初级护理和神经科以协调方式进行的随访,以防止在30天内过早再入院。