• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级卫生保健中患者报告结局测量的电子实施:混合方法系统评价

Electronic Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Health Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sasseville Maxime, Supper Wilfried, Gartner Jean-Baptiste, Layani Géraldine, Amil Samira, Sheffield Peter, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Hudon Catherine, Lambert Sylvie, Attisso Eugène, Ouellet Steven, Breton Mylaine, Poitras Marie-Eve, Roux-Lévy Pierre-Henri, Plaisimond James, Bergeron Frédéric, Ashcroft Rachelle, Wong Sabrina T, Groulx Antoine, Paquette Jean-Sébastien, D'Anjou Natasha, Langlois Sylviane, LeBlanc Annie

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 5;27:e63639. doi: 10.2196/63639.

DOI:10.2196/63639
PMID:40324173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12089857/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Managing chronic diseases remains a critical challenge in primary health care (PHC) across the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) are emerging as valuable tools for enhancing patient engagement, facilitating clinical decision-making, and improving health outcomes. However, their implementation in PHC remains limited, with significant variability in effectiveness and adoption.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to assess the implementation and effectiveness of ePROMs in chronic disease management within PHC settings and to identify key barriers and facilitators influencing their integration.

METHODS

A mixed methods systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Methods and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We included studies that implemented ePROMs among adults for chronic disease management in PHC. The extracted data included patient health outcomes, provider workflow implications, implementation factors, and cost considerations. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework was used.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 12,525 references, from which 22 (0.18%) studies were included after screening and exclusions. These studies, primarily conducted in the United States (n=9, 41%) and Canada (n=8, 36%), covered various chronic diseases and used diverse ePROM tools, predominantly mobile apps (n=9, 41%). While some studies (n=10, 45%) reported improvements in patient health outcomes and self-management, others (n=12, 55%) indicated no significant change. Key barriers included digital literacy gaps, integration challenges within clinical workflows, and increased provider workload. Facilitators included strong patient-provider relationships, personalized interventions, and technical support for users. While some studies (n=10, 45%) demonstrated improved patient engagement and self-management, long-term cost-effectiveness and sustainability remain uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Success in implementing ePROMs in PHC appears to hinge on addressing digital literacy, ensuring personalization and meaningful patient-provider interactions, carefully integrating technology into clinical workflows, and conducting thorough research on their long-term impacts and cost-effectiveness. Future efforts should focus on these areas to fully realize the benefits of digital health technologies for patients, providers, and health care systems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022333513; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022333513.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/48155.

摘要

背景

在经济合作与发展组织国家的初级卫生保健(PHC)中,慢性病管理仍然是一项严峻挑战。电子患者报告结局测量(ePROMs)正逐渐成为增强患者参与度、促进临床决策制定以及改善健康结局的宝贵工具。然而,它们在初级卫生保健中的实施仍然有限,在有效性和采用率方面存在显著差异。

目的

本系统评价旨在评估ePROMs在初级卫生保健环境下慢性病管理中的实施情况和有效性,并确定影响其整合的关键障碍和促进因素。

方法

按照Cochrane方法和PRISMA(系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南进行混合方法系统评价。我们纳入了在初级卫生保健中针对成人慢性病管理实施ePROMs的研究。提取的数据包括患者健康结局、对医疗服务提供者工作流程的影响、实施因素和成本考量。使用了可及性、有效性、采用率、实施和维持框架。

结果

我们的检索共获得12525篇参考文献,经过筛选和排除后纳入了22项(0.18%)研究。这些研究主要在美国(n = 9,41%)和加拿大(n = 8,36%)开展,涵盖了各种慢性病,并使用了多种ePROM工具,其中主要是移动应用程序(n = 9,41%)。虽然一些研究(n = 10,45%)报告了患者健康结局和自我管理方面的改善,但其他研究(n = 12,55%)表明没有显著变化。关键障碍包括数字素养差距、临床工作流程中的整合挑战以及医疗服务提供者工作量增加。促进因素包括良好的医患关系、个性化干预以及对用户的技术支持。虽然一些研究(n = 10,45%)显示患者参与度和自我管理有所改善,但长期成本效益和可持续性仍不确定。

结论

在初级卫生保健中成功实施ePROMs似乎取决于解决数字素养问题、确保个性化以及有意义的医患互动、将技术谨慎地整合到临床工作流程中,以及对其长期影响和成本效益进行全面研究。未来的努力应集中在这些领域,以充分实现数字健康技术给患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗保健系统带来的益处。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42022333513;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022333513。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):RR2 - 10.2196/48155。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/227d/12089857/c98ad0b5c2fd/jmir_v27i1e63639_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/227d/12089857/c98ad0b5c2fd/jmir_v27i1e63639_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/227d/12089857/c98ad0b5c2fd/jmir_v27i1e63639_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Electronic Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Health Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.初级卫生保健中患者报告结局测量的电子实施:混合方法系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 5;27:e63639. doi: 10.2196/63639.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology Adoption Among Older Adults With Chronic Diseases: Updated Systematic Review.慢性病老年患者采用数字健康技术的障碍与促进因素:最新系统评价
JMIR Aging. 2025 Sep 11;8:e80000. doi: 10.2196/80000.
4
Implementation of Machine Learning Applications in Health Care Organizations: Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.机器学习在医疗保健组织中的应用实施:实证研究的系统回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 25;26:e55897. doi: 10.2196/55897.
5
What Helps or Hinders Annual Wellness Visits for Detection and Management of Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults? A Scoping Review Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.哪些因素有助于或阻碍老年人进行年度健康检查以检测和管理认知障碍?一项以实施研究综合框架为指导的范围综述
Nurs Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):295. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15080295.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing AI in Routine Medical Imaging: Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.常规医学影像中实施人工智能的促进因素和障碍:系统评价与定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 21;27:e63649. doi: 10.2196/63649.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.审视与终端用户共同设计数字健康干预措施所面临的挑战:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e50178. doi: 10.2196/50178.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Aligning metrics with meaning: considerations for measurement selection in disability evaluation.使指标与意义相匹配:残疾评估中测量选择的考量因素
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Aug 14;6:1657105. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1657105. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Integration of Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Health Care for Chronic Disease Management: Protocol for a Systematic Review.用于慢性病管理的初级卫生保健中数字患者报告结局测量的临床整合:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 18;12:e48155. doi: 10.2196/48155.
2
Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review.在医疗保健环境中实施电子患者报告的结果和体验测量的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Feb 14;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00554-2.
3
Use of Mobile Apps in Heart Failure Self-management: Qualitative Study Exploring the Patient and Primary Care Clinician Perspective.
移动应用程序在心力衰竭自我管理中的应用:探索患者和初级保健临床医生观点的定性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2022 Apr 20;6(1):e33992. doi: 10.2196/33992.
4
An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Older Adults With Complex Chronic Conditions: Cost-Utility Analysis.一种用于患有复杂慢性病的老年人的电子患者报告结局工具:成本效用分析。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Apr 20;5(2):e35075. doi: 10.2196/35075.
5
Assessment of an Interactive Digital Health-Based Self-management Program to Reduce Hospitalizations Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于互动数字健康的自我管理计划对减少多种慢性病患者住院的评估:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2140591. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40591.
6
Patient-reported outcome measures for knowledge transfer and behaviour modification interventions in type 2 diabetes-the INDICA study: a multiarm cluster randomised controlled trial.患者报告结局测量在 2 型糖尿病知识转移和行为改变干预中的应用:INDICA 研究:一项多臂群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):e050804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050804.
7
Assessing the Implementation and Effectiveness of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Older Adults With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study.评估电子患者报告结局工具在满足复杂护理需求的老年患者中的实施情况和效果:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 2;23(12):e29071. doi: 10.2196/29071.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.更新系统评价报告指南:PRISMA 2020 声明的制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
10
Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review.电子患者报告结局测量的利弊:系统评价
JMIR Perioper Med. 2020 Apr 3;3(1):e15588. doi: 10.2196/15588.