Suppr超能文献

小型医院的产科是否安全?来自新西兰围产期区域化系统的证据。

Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system.

作者信息

Rosenblatt R A, Reinken J, Shoemack P

出版信息

Lancet. 1985 Aug 24;2(8452):429-32. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92747-3.

Abstract

Perinatal mortality rates were determined for all public maternity hospitals in New Zealand for the years 1978-1981. Level 1 maternity hospitals-mostly small rural units staffed by general practitioners and midwives-had lower birth-weight-specific perinatal mortality rates in all but the lowest birth-weight categories than the better equipped hospitals to which they refer. This probably reflects the cautious antenatal practices of general practitioners, and the effective regionalisation of perinatal services in New Zealand. It is also possible that there is an advantage, particularly for normal birth-weight children, in being born in smaller obstetric units. There is no evidence that a satisfactory outcome depends on a minimum number of deliveries.

摘要

统计了1978 - 1981年新西兰所有公立妇产医院的围产期死亡率。一级妇产医院——大多是由全科医生和助产士组成的小型农村医疗单位——除了出生体重最低的类别外,在所有其他出生体重类别中的特定出生体重围产期死亡率均低于它们转诊的设备更完善的医院。这可能反映了全科医生谨慎的产前诊疗行为,以及新西兰围产期服务的有效区域化。对于出生体重正常的儿童来说,在较小的产科单位出生也有可能存在优势。没有证据表明满意的分娩结果取决于最低分娩数量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验