• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉中的注意力权重是空间和非空间成分的产物。

Attentional weights in vision as products of spatial and nonspatial components.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.

Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg, Denmark.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1043-1051. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1337-1.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-017-1337-1
PMID:28634784
Abstract

The relationship between visual attentional selection of items in particular spatial locations and selection by nonspatial criteria was investigated in a partial report experiment with report of letters (as many as possible) from brief postmasked exposures of circular arrays of letters and digits. The data were fitted by mathematical models based on Bundesen's (Psychological Review, 97, 523-547, 1990) theory of visual attention (TVA). Both attentional weights of targets (letters) and attentional weights of distractors (digits) showed strong variations across the eight possible target locations, but for each of the ten participants, the ratio of the weight of a distractor at a given location to the weight of a target at the same location was approximately constant. The results were accommodated by revising the weight equation of TVA such that the attentional weight of an object equals a product of a spatial weight component (weight due to being at a particular location) and a nonspatial weight component (weight due to having particular features other than locations), the two components scaling the effects of each other multiplicatively.

摘要

在一项部分报告实验中,通过短暂的掩蔽后呈现字母和数字的圆形数组,研究了特定空间位置的项目的视觉注意力选择与非空间标准选择之间的关系。数据通过基于 Bundesen(1990 年,《心理学评论》,97,523-547)视觉注意理论(TVA)的数学模型进行拟合。目标(字母)的注意力权重和分心物(数字)的注意力权重在八个可能的目标位置都表现出强烈的变化,但对于每个十位参与者,给定位置上的分心物的权重与同一位置上的目标的权重的比值基本保持不变。通过修改 TVA 的权重方程,使物体的注意力权重等于空间权重分量(由于位于特定位置而产生的权重)和非空间权重分量(由于具有特定特征而产生的权重,除了位置)的乘积,这两个分量以乘法方式相互缩放影响,从而适应了结果。

相似文献

1
Attentional weights in vision as products of spatial and nonspatial components.视觉中的注意力权重是空间和非空间成分的产物。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1043-1051. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1337-1.
2
Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.通过实验分析和计算建模识别注意权重的自下而上和自上而下成分。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):510-35. doi: 10.1037/a0029631. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
3
Interaction between object-based attention and pertinence values shapes the attentional priority map of a multielement display.基于客体的注意与相关性值之间的相互作用塑造了多元素显示的注意优先级图谱。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):866-877. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000194. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Event-related Electroencephalographic Lateralizations Mark Individual Differences in Spatial and Nonspatial Visual Selection.事件相关脑电的侧化标志着空间和非空间视觉选择的个体差异。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Apr;30(4):482-497. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01221. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
The guidance of visual search by shape features and shape configurations.形状特征和形状配置对视觉搜索的引导作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jul;44(7):1072-1085. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000514. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
The influence of alertness on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention.警觉性对视觉注意的空间和非空间成分的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):38-56. doi: 10.1037/a0017602.
7
Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.打开窗口:注意窗口的大小在视觉选择中主导感知负荷和熟悉度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Nov;44(11):1780-1798. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000565. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.统计规律调节注意捕获。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):13-17. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000472.
9
How does phasic alerting improve performance in patients with unilateral neglect? A systematic analysis of attentional processing capacity and spatial weighting mechanisms.相敏警觉如何改善单侧忽视患者的表现?对注意加工能力和空间加权机制的系统分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1178-89. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
10
Interactions between space-based and feature-based attention.基于空间和基于特征的注意力之间的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):11-6. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000011. Epub 2014 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroscientific Analysis of Logo Design: Implications for Luxury Brand Marketing.标志设计的神经科学分析:对奢侈品牌营销的启示
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;15(4):502. doi: 10.3390/bs15040502.
2
Vision of objects happens faster and earlier for location than for identity.对于物体位置的视觉感知比对物体身份的视觉感知发生得更快、更早。
iScience. 2024 Dec 27;28(2):111702. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111702. eCollection 2025 Feb 21.
3
The time course of salience: not entirely caused by salience.突显的时程:并非完全由突显引起。

本文引用的文献

1
Neurons in Primate Visual Cortex Alternate between Responses to Multiple Stimuli in Their Receptive Field.灵长类动物视觉皮层中的神经元在其感受野对多种刺激的反应之间交替。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2016 Dec 27;10:141. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2016.00141. eCollection 2016.
2
Responses of Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Neurons to a Plurality of Stimuli in Their Receptive Fields.漏电整合发放神经元对其感受野中多个刺激的反应。
J Math Neurosci. 2016 Dec;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13408-016-0040-2. Epub 2016 May 23.
3
Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.
Psychol Res. 2022 Feb;86(1):234-251. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01470-6. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Poking Left To Be Right? A Model-Based Analysis of Temporal Order Judged by Mice.向左戳是为了正确?基于模型的小鼠对时间顺序判断的分析
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun 30;14(2):39-50. doi: 10.5709/acp-0237-0. eCollection 2018.
5
Spatial sampling in human visual cortex is modulated by both spatial and feature-based attention.人类视觉皮层的空间采样受空间和基于特征的注意力的调节。
Elife. 2018 Dec 7;7:e36928. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36928.
刺激竞争介导了基于空间和特征的注意的联合效应。
J Vis. 2015;15(14):7. doi: 10.1167/15.14.7.
4
Components of visual bias: a multiplicative hypothesis.视觉偏差的组成部分:一种乘法假设。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:116-24. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12665. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
5
Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.预测性干扰物情境有助于对高显著性目标进行注意选择,但对中等和低显著性目标则不然。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Mar;36(3):935-44. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22677. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
6
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.引导搜索 2.0:一种改进的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774.
7
Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.通过实验分析和计算建模识别注意权重的自下而上和自上而下成分。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):510-35. doi: 10.1037/a0029631. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
8
The spotlight of attention illuminates failed feature-based expectancies.聚光灯的焦点照亮了基于特征的失败预期。
Psychophysiology. 2012 Aug;49(8):1101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01385.x. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
9
Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: parietal interactions.注意优先级与短期记忆访问:顶叶的相互作用。
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1551-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038. Epub 2012 May 24.
10
How prevalent is object-based attention?基于对象的注意有多普遍?
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030693. Epub 2012 Feb 13.