Suppr超能文献

利拉鲁肽与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂治疗日本2型糖尿病患者的网络荟萃分析

Network meta-analysis of liraglutide versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japanese patients.

作者信息

Ayers Dieter, Kanters Steve, Goldgrub Rachel, Hughes Monica, Kato Ryo, Kragh Nana

机构信息

a Precision Health Economics , Vancouver , BC , Canada.

b School of Population and Public Health , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Sep;33(9):1653-1661. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1345730. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine the comparative efficacy and safety of liraglutide and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors as antidiabetics for Japanese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating outcomes among Japanese adults with uncontrolled T2DM and including liraglutide or DPP-4 inhibitors up to August 2016. We extracted data on trial and patient characteristics, and the following outcomes: HbA1c, weight, patients meeting HbA1c <7%, patients experiencing hypoglycemic events, microalbuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and creatinine. We synthesized data using network meta-analyses (NMA) using a Bayesian framework. Continuous outcomes were modeled using normal likelihoods and an identity link, while dichotomous outcomes were modeled using a binomial likelihood and a logit link.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review yielded 39 publications pertaining to 38 trials. A total of 27 trials (5032 patients) reported change in HbA1c at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks 9 trials (2091 patients). All treatments showed statistically significant reductions in HbA1c relative to placebo at 12 and 24 weeks. Liraglutide 0.9 mg was statistically superior to all DPP-4 interventions (vildagliptin, sitagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin, teneligliptin, trelagliptin and omarigliptin) at 12 weeks and 24 weeks among those reporting. Treatments were not statistically differentiable with respect to weight change and risk of hypoglycemia. Finally, no comparisons of eGFR and microalbuminuria were conducted, as this data was reported in too few trials to conduct analyses.

LIMITATIONS

Some important outcomes were limited by poor reporting (eGFR and microalbuminuria) or low event rates (hypoglycemia). The follow-up time was relatively short. Clinically, the 24 week time point is more important as it demonstrates more sustained results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research suggests that liraglutide 0.9 mg offers a more efficacious treatment option for T2DM than the DPP-4 inhibitors among adult Japanese patients and that it is a viable option for this population.

摘要

目的

确定利拉鲁肽和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂作为抗糖尿病药物对日本2型糖尿病(T2DM)控制不佳患者的相对疗效和安全性。

方法和材料

我们检索了截至2016年8月评估日本T2DM控制不佳成年人结局且纳入利拉鲁肽或DPP-4抑制剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们提取了试验和患者特征数据以及以下结局数据:糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、体重、HbA1c<7%的患者、发生低血糖事件的患者、微量白蛋白尿、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和肌酐。我们使用贝叶斯框架通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)对数据进行综合分析。连续结局采用正态似然和恒等链接进行建模,二分结局采用二项似然和logit链接进行建模。

结果

系统文献综述产生了39篇与38项试验相关的出版物。共有27项试验(5032例患者)报告了12周时HbA1c的变化,9项试验(2091例患者)报告了24周时HbA1c的变化。在12周和24周时,所有治疗相对于安慰剂均显示出HbA1c有统计学意义的降低。在报告的患者中,12周和24周时,0.9mg利拉鲁肽在统计学上优于所有DPP-4干预措施(维格列汀、西他列汀、利格列汀、阿格列汀、替奈利汀、曲格列汀和奥马格列汀)。在体重变化和低血糖风险方面,各治疗方法在统计学上无差异。最后,由于报告该数据的试验过少无法进行分析,因此未对eGFR和微量白蛋白尿进行比较。

局限性

一些重要结局受到报告不佳(eGFR和微量白蛋白尿)或事件发生率低(低血糖)的限制。随访时间相对较短。临床上,24周时间点更为重要,因为它显示出更持久的结果。

结论

我们的研究表明,对于成年日本患者,0.9mg利拉鲁肽比DPP-4抑制剂为T2DM提供了更有效的治疗选择,并且是该人群的可行选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验