Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):87-100. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12720. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
Population cycles have long fascinated ecologists from the time of Charles Elton in the 1920s. The discovery of large population fluctuations in undisturbed ecosystems challenged the idea that pristine nature was in a state of balance. The 10-year cycle of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus Erxleben) across the boreal forests of Canada and Alaska is a classic cycle, recognized by fur traders for more than 300 years. Since the 1930s, ecologists have investigated the mechanisms that might cause these cycles. Proposed causal mechanisms have varied from sunspots to food supplies, parasites, diseases, predation and social behaviour. Both the birth rate and the death rate change dramatically over the cycle. Social behaviour was eliminated as a possible cause because snowshoe hares are not territorial and do not commit infanticide. Since the 1960s, large-scale manipulative experiments have been used to discover the major limiting factors. Food supply and predation quickly became recognized as potential key factors causing the cycle. Experiments adding food and restricting predator access to field populations have been decisive in pinpointing predation as the key mechanism causing these fluctuations. The immediate cause of death of most snowshoe hares is predation by a variety of predators, including the Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis Kerr). The collapse in the reproductive rate is not due to food shortage as was originally thought, but is a result of chronic stress from predator chases. Five major issues remain unresolved. First, what is the nature of the predator-induced memory that results in the prolonged low phase of the cycle? Second, why do hare cycles form a travelling wave, starting in the centre of the boreal forest in Saskatchewan and travelling across western Canada and Alaska? Third, why does the amplitude of the cycle vary greatly from one cycle to the next in the same area? Fourth, do the same mechanisms of population limitation apply to snowshoe hares in eastern North American or in similar ecosystems across Siberia? Finally, what effect will climatic warming have on all the above issues? The answers to these questions remain for future generations of biologists to determine.
人口周期长期以来一直吸引着生态学家,从 20 世纪 20 年代的查尔斯·埃尔顿(Charles Elton)时代就开始了。在未受干扰的生态系统中发现的大规模种群波动挑战了原始自然处于平衡状态的观点。跨越加拿大和阿拉斯加北方森林的雪鞋野兔(Lepus americanus Erxleben)的 10 年周期是一个经典的周期,毛皮商人 300 多年来一直认识到这一周期。自 20 世纪 30 年代以来,生态学家一直在研究可能导致这些周期的机制。提出的因果机制从太阳黑子到食物供应、寄生虫、疾病、捕食和社会行为各不相同。在整个周期中,出生率和死亡率都发生了巨大变化。由于雪鞋野兔没有领地,也不会犯杀婴罪,因此社会行为被排除在可能的原因之外。自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,大规模的操纵实验已被用于发现主要的限制因素。食物供应和捕食很快被认为是导致这种周期的潜在关键因素。在现场种群中添加食物和限制捕食者进入的实验对于确定捕食是导致这些波动的关键机制具有决定性意义。大多数雪鞋野兔的直接死因是各种捕食者的捕食,包括加拿大猞猁(Lynx canadensis Kerr)。繁殖率的下降不是由于最初认为的食物短缺,而是由于捕食者追逐造成的慢性压力。仍有五个主要问题尚未解决。首先,是什么导致了捕食者诱导的记忆,从而导致周期的长期低阶段?其次,为什么野兔周期会形成一个传播波,从萨斯喀彻温省北方森林的中心开始,穿过加拿大西部和阿拉斯加?第三,为什么在同一地区,一个周期到下一个周期的周期幅度变化很大?第四,种群限制的相同机制是否适用于北美东部的雪鞋野兔或西伯利亚类似的生态系统?最后,气候变暖对所有上述问题会有什么影响?这些问题的答案有待未来几代生物学家来确定。