• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较镇痛药治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的富集试验与非富集试验的效应量:系统评价。

Comparison of effect sizes between enriched and nonenriched trials of analgesics for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia.

Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;83(11):2347-2355. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13350. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.13350
PMID:28636752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5651314/
Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the use of an enriched study design on the estimates of treatment effect in analgesic trials for chronic musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

Database searches were conducted from 2004 to 2014. We included randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating pain medications for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. The estimates of treatment effect on pain and adverse events were compared between enriched and nonenriched designs. Metaregression was used to assess the association between the effect size estimate and the study design controlling for analgesic dose and methodological quality.

RESULTS

We included 108 trials, of which 99 were included in the meta-analysis (n = 44 171). There were no overall differences in effect sizes between enriched and nonenriched designs for pain intensity. There was a significant difference for a reduction in any adverse events favouring enriched designs for opioids, but not for other analgesics or the outcome serious adverse events. There was an association between effect size and methodological quality, with failure to blind the outcome assessor and failure to use intention-to-treat analysis being associated with larger effect sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that the use of an enriched study design changes the treatment effect size estimate for pain. There is some evidence that clinical trials that employ enriched designs report a reduced risk of adverse events in trials for chronic musculoskeletal pain, but it is unclear whether enriched designs influence estimates of serious adverse events. Features of trial design and study quality were associated with treatment effect estimates.

摘要

目的

研究在慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的镇痛试验中,使用强化研究设计对治疗效果估计的影响。

方法

从 2004 年到 2014 年进行了数据库搜索。我们纳入了评估慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛疼痛药物的随机安慰剂对照试验。使用 PEDro 量表评估方法学质量。比较强化设计和非强化设计之间疼痛和不良反应治疗效果的估计值。使用元回归来评估在控制镇痛剂量和方法学质量的情况下,治疗效果估计值与研究设计之间的关联。

结果

我们纳入了 108 项试验,其中 99 项试验纳入了荟萃分析(n=44171)。在疼痛强度方面,强化设计和非强化设计之间的效果大小没有总体差异。对于减少任何不良反应,阿片类药物的强化设计效果显著,但其他镇痛药或严重不良反应的结果则不然。治疗效果与方法学质量之间存在关联,结局评估者未设盲和未使用意向治疗分析与较大的效果大小有关。

结论

没有证据表明使用强化研究设计会改变疼痛的治疗效果估计值。有一些证据表明,采用强化设计的临床试验报告慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛试验中不良反应风险降低,但尚不清楚强化设计是否会影响严重不良反应的估计值。试验设计和研究质量的特征与治疗效果估计值有关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of effect sizes between enriched and nonenriched trials of analgesics for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review.比较镇痛药治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的富集试验与非富集试验的效应量:系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;83(11):2347-2355. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13350. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
2
Antidepressants for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.用于治疗儿童和青少年慢性非癌性疼痛的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012535.pub2.
3
Topical analgesics for acute and chronic pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane Reviews.用于成人急慢性疼痛的局部镇痛药——Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 12;5(5):CD008609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008609.pub2.
4
Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年慢性非癌性疼痛的抗癫痫药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012536.pub2.
5
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
6
Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults.针刺疗法治疗成人神经性疼痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 2;12(12):CD012057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012057.pub2.
7
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年慢性非癌性疼痛的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 2;8(8):CD012537. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012537.pub2.
8
Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults.局部用可乐定治疗成人神经病理性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD010967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010967.pub3.
9
Single-dose intravenous diclofenac for acute postoperative pain in adults.单剂量静脉注射双氯芬酸用于成人急性术后疼痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 28;8(8):CD012498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012498.pub2.
10
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.成人纤维肌痛的经皮电神经刺激(TENS)疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 9;10(10):CD012172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012172.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Does opioid therapy enhance quality of life in patients suffering from chronic non-malignant pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.阿片类药物疗法能否提高慢性非恶性疼痛患者的生活质量?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Pain. 2024 Jun;18(3):227-242. doi: 10.1177/20494637231216352. Epub 2023 Nov 26.
2
Comparative effectiveness and safety of analgesic medicines for adults with acute non-specific low back pain: systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人急性非特异性下腰痛镇痛药物的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 22;380:e072962. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072962.
3
Study Design Characteristics and Endpoints for Enriched Enrollment Randomized Withdrawal Trials for Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review.慢性疼痛患者富集入组随机撤药试验的研究设计特征与终点:一项系统评价
J Pain Res. 2022 Feb 17;15:479-496. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S334840. eCollection 2022.
4
Analgesic medicines for adults with low back pain: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人腰痛的镇痛药:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01506-3.
5
Are Opioids Needed to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain? A Review of Treatment Options and Analgesics in Development.治疗慢性下腰痛需要使用阿片类药物吗?对治疗选择和正在研发的镇痛药的综述。
J Pain Res. 2020 May 14;13:1007-1022. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S226483. eCollection 2020.
6
Designing and conducting proof-of-concept chronic pain analgesic clinical trials.设计并开展慢性疼痛镇痛概念验证临床试验。
Pain Rep. 2019 Feb 26;4(3):e697. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000697. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy, Tolerability, and Dose-Dependent Effects of Opioid Analgesics for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.阿片类镇痛药治疗腰痛的疗效、耐受性和剂量依赖性效应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):958-68. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1251.
2
The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands.《2016年IUPHAR/BPS药理学指南:迈向1300个蛋白质靶点与6000种配体之间的精准定量相互作用》
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1054-68. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1037. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
3
Systematic review of enriched enrolment, randomised withdrawal trial designs in chronic pain: a new framework for design and reporting.慢性疼痛中富集入组、随机撤药试验设计的系统评价:设计与报告的新框架
Pain. 2015 Aug;156(8):1382-1395. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000088.
4
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis.提高研究设计、实施和分析的价值并减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):166-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
5
Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.系统评价荟萃分析:研究设计特征对随机对照试验干预效果评估的影响。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Sep;16(35):1-82. doi: 10.3310/hta16350.
6
Relationship of negative affect and outcome of an opioid therapy trial among low back pain patients.慢性腰痛患者阿片类药物治疗试验的负面情绪与结局的关系。
Pain Pract. 2013 Mar;13(3):173-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00575.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
7
A comparison between enriched and nonenriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials of opioids for chronic noncancer pain.阿比较富有和nonenriched 注册随机撤退试验阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌痛。
Pain Res Manag. 2011 Sep-Oct;16(5):337-51. doi: 10.1155/2011/465281.
8
Fixed-dose combination of enteric-coated naproxen and immediate-release esomeprazole has comparable efficacy to celecoxib for knee osteoarthritis: two randomized trials.萘普生肠溶固定剂量联合埃索美拉唑速释制剂治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效与塞来昔布相当:两项随机试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jun;27(6):1243-53. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.580340. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
9
Predictors of response to cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors in osteoarthritis: pooled results from two identical trials comparing etoricoxib, celecoxib, and placebo.环氧化酶-2 抑制剂治疗骨关节炎反应的预测因素:比较依托考昔、塞来昔布和安慰剂的两项相同试验的汇总结果。
Pain Med. 2011 Mar;12(3):352-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01060.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
10
Enrichment of clinical study populations.临床研究人群的丰富。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;88(6):774-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.233. Epub 2010 Oct 13.