Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Department of Tobacco Research, Centre for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):888-896. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx134.
This study examines patterns of change in different smoker subgroups' responses to new pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) over the initial, two year post-implementation period in Canada, where HWLs include package inserts with cessation messages, and Australia, where "plain" packaging (i.e., prohibition of brand imagery) was also implemented.
Data were collected from online consumer panels in Canada (nsmokers = 3153; nobservations = 5826) and Australia (nsmokers = 2699; nobservations = 5818) from September 2012 to September 2014, with approximately 1000 adult smokers surveyed in each country every four months, using replenishment to maintain sample size. Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equation models where main effects and interactions among time, country, and socio-demographic factors on HWL responses (i.e., attention to HWLs; cognitive and behavioral responses to HWLs) were examined.
Over time, attention to HWLs declined but cognitive and forgoing responses to HWLs increased, in both Canada and Australia. In both countries, compared to smokers with low income and/or education, smokers with high income and/or education showed an increase over time in attention and cognitive responses to HWLs (p < .05). In Australia only, compared to older smokers, younger smokers showed less decline over time in attention and greater increase in cognitive and forgoing responses to HWLs (p < .001).
Novel HWL policies in Canada and Australia appear effective in staving off "wear out" over the first 2 years after implementation, particularly amongst smokers who are from higher SES groups and, in Australia, who are younger.
Previous research shows that the effects of health warning label (HWL) on smokers decline over time, but no studies to date have evaluated whether trends differ across socio-demographic groups. This study suggests that innovative policy configurations that combine prominent pictorial HWLs with inserts (Canada) and with "plain" packaging (Australia) may delay wear out over the first 2 years after implementation. While this study found evidence for wear out in attention to HWLs, other HWL responses (cognitive responses, forgoing cigarettes) actually increased over time, with greater increases amongst smokers with higher income and/or education.
本研究考察了在加拿大(新的健康警示标签(HWL)包括带有戒烟信息的包装插页)和澳大利亚(实施了“素包”(即禁止品牌形象))实施的最初两年中,不同吸烟亚组对新的图片健康警示标签的反应变化模式。
本研究于 2012 年 9 月至 2014 年 9 月期间,从加拿大(非吸烟者=3153;观察次数=5826)和澳大利亚(非吸烟者=2699;观察次数=5818)的在线消费者小组中收集数据,每个国家每四个月调查大约 1000 名成年吸烟者,通过补充调查来维持样本量。使用广义估计方程模型分析数据,检验时间、国家和社会人口因素对 HWL 反应(即对 HWL 的关注、对 HWL 的认知和行为反应)的主要效应和交互作用。
随着时间的推移,加拿大和澳大利亚的吸烟者对 HWL 的关注都有所下降,但对 HWL 的认知和放弃反应都有所增加。在这两个国家,与收入和/或教育水平较低的吸烟者相比,收入和/或教育水平较高的吸烟者对 HWL 的关注和认知反应随着时间的推移而增加(p<.05)。仅在澳大利亚,与较年长的吸烟者相比,年轻的吸烟者随着时间的推移对 HWL 的关注下降较少,对 HWL 的认知和放弃反应增加较多(p<.001)。
加拿大和澳大利亚的新型 HWL 政策在实施后的头 2 年内似乎有效防止了“磨损”,特别是在来自较高社会经济地位群体的吸烟者中,在澳大利亚,还包括较年轻的吸烟者。
以前的研究表明,HWL 对吸烟者的影响随着时间的推移而减弱,但迄今为止,尚无研究评估这些趋势在社会人口群体中的差异。本研究表明,将突出的图片 HWL 与插页(加拿大)和“素包”(澳大利亚)相结合的创新政策组合可能会在实施后的头 2 年内延缓“磨损”。虽然本研究发现对 HWL 的关注存在“磨损”的证据,但其他 HWL 反应(认知反应、放弃吸烟)实际上随着时间的推移而增加,收入和/或教育水平较高的吸烟者增加幅度更大。