Allen Casey J, Baldor Daniel J, Schulman Carl I, Pizano Louis R, Livingstone Alan S, Namias Nicholas
Am Surg. 2017 Jun 1;83(6):648-652.
Florida considers the International Classification Injury Severity Score (ICISS) from hospital discharges within a geographic region in the apportionment of trauma centers (TCs). Patients with an ICISS <0.85 are considered to require triage to a TC, yet many are triaged to an emergency department (ED). We assess outcomes of those with an ICISS <0.85 by the actual triage decision of emergency medical services (EMS). From October 2011 to October 2013, 39,021 consecutive admissions with injury ICD-9 codes were analyzed. ICISS was calculated from the product of the survival risk ratios for a patient's three worst injuries. Outcomes were compared between patients with ICISS <0.85 either triaged to the ED or its separate, neighboring, free-standing TC at a large urban hospital. A total of 32,191 (83%) patients were triaged to the ED by EMS and 6,827 (17%) were triaged to the TC. Of these, 2544 had an ICISS <0.85, with 2145 (84%) being triaged to the TC and 399 (16%) to the ED. In these patients, those taken to the TC more often required admission, and those taken to the ED had better outcomes. When the confounders influencing triage to an ED or a TC are eliminated, those triaged by EMS to the ED rather than the TC had better overall outcomes. EMS providers better identified patients at risk for mortality than did the retrospective application of ICISS. ICISS <0.85 does not identify the absolute need for TC as EMS providers were able to appropriately triage a large portion of this population to the ED.
佛罗里达州在创伤中心(TC)的分配中,会参考某一地理区域内医院出院病例的国际疾病分类损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)。ICISS<0.85的患者被认为需要分诊至创伤中心,但许多患者却被分诊至急诊科(ED)。我们根据紧急医疗服务(EMS)的实际分诊决定,评估ICISS<0.85患者的治疗结果。对2011年10月至2013年10月期间连续收治的39,021例有损伤ICD - 9编码的患者进行了分析。ICISS通过患者三处最严重损伤的生存风险比之积来计算。对ICISS<0.85且被分诊至一家大型城市医院急诊科或其独立的、相邻的、独立设置的创伤中心的患者的治疗结果进行了比较。共有32,191例(83%)患者被EMS分诊至急诊科,6,827例(17%)被分诊至创伤中心。其中,2544例患者ICISS<0.85,2145例(84%)被分诊至创伤中心,399例(16%)被分诊至急诊科。在这些患者中,被送往创伤中心的患者更常需要住院治疗,而被送往急诊科的患者治疗结果更好。当消除影响分诊至急诊科或创伤中心的混杂因素后,被EMS分诊至急诊科而非创伤中心的患者总体治疗结果更好。与ICISS的回顾性应用相比,EMS提供者能更好地识别有死亡风险的患者。ICISS<0.85并不能确定患者绝对需要创伤中心治疗,因为EMS提供者能够将这部分人群中的很大一部分恰当地分诊至急诊科。