Suppr超能文献

区域性创伤系统中创伤分诊标准效能的评估。

Evaluation of Trauma Triage Criteria Performance in a Regional Trauma System.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;23(6):828-837. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1588444. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of individual trauma triage criteria using data from a regional trauma registry. Los Angeles County (LAC) paramedics use triage criteria adapted from the 2011 Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines to triage injured patients to Trauma Centers (TCs). TCs report outcomes to a LAC EMS registry. We abstracted data for patients 15 years or older from 2013 to 2015 and identified all trauma triage criteria that were met for each encounter. Study outcomes were: (1) "clear need" for a TC, defined as receiving a non-orthopedic operative intervention within 6 hours of arrival, injury severity score (ISS) > 15, or surgical ICU admission; or (2) "no need" for a TC, defined as discharge home from the emergency department (ED). We also defined "possible need" as those patients not discharged home from the ED, inclusive of "clear need" and all other admitted patients. For each individual triage criteria, we calculated the positive likelihood ratios and positive predictive values for TC need. There were 71,536 adult patients in the registry transported by EMS to a LAC TC during the study. Median age was 38 years (IQR 25-55) with 73% male. There were 23,628 (33%) who met "no need" criteria for a TC, leaving 47,908 (67%) patients with "possible need" for a TC, of whom 13,343 patients (19% of total) met "clear need" for a TC. No individual trauma criterion met the a priori likelihood ratio threshold of 10 for predicting "clear need" for a TC. Cardiopulmonary arrest with penetrating torso trauma and flail chest met this threshold for "possible need." In this retrospective analysis, no individual triage criterion definitively identified patients who benefit from transport to a TC. Yet, the majority of patients demonstrated potential benefit for nearly all criteria, supporting CDC recommendations that trauma triage criteria be considered in their entirety, not as individual criterion.

摘要

我们使用区域创伤登记处的数据评估了个体创伤分诊标准的性能。洛杉矶县 (LAC) 护理人员使用改编自 2011 年疾病控制与预防中心 (CDC) 指南的分诊标准将受伤患者分诊到创伤中心 (TC)。TC 向 LAC EMS 登记处报告结果。我们从 2013 年到 2015 年为 15 岁或以上的患者提取数据,并确定了每次就诊符合的所有创伤分诊标准。研究结果为:(1)“明确需要”TC,定义为在到达后 6 小时内接受非骨科手术干预、损伤严重程度评分 (ISS) > 15 或入住外科重症监护病房;或 (2)“不需要”TC,定义为从急诊科 (ED) 出院回家。我们还将“可能需要”定义为从 ED 未出院的患者,包括“明确需要”和所有其他入院患者。对于每个单独的分诊标准,我们计算了 TC 需要的阳性似然比和阳性预测值。 在研究期间,有 71536 名成年患者通过 EMS 被送往 LAC TC。中位数年龄为 38 岁(IQR 25-55),73%为男性。有 23628 人(33%)符合 TC 不需要的标准,留下 47908 人(67%)患者对 TC“可能需要”,其中 13343 人(占总数的 19%)符合 TC“明确需要”。没有单个创伤标准满足预测 TC“明确需要”的先验似然比阈值 10。心肺骤停伴穿透性胸外伤和连枷胸符合“可能需要”的阈值。 在这项回顾性分析中,没有单个分诊标准可以明确确定从 TC 转运中受益的患者。然而,大多数患者表现出对几乎所有标准的潜在益处,支持 CDC 建议将创伤分诊标准作为一个整体而不是单个标准进行考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验