• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域性创伤系统中创伤分诊标准效能的评估。

Evaluation of Trauma Triage Criteria Performance in a Regional Trauma System.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;23(6):828-837. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1588444. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1080/10903127.2019.1588444
PMID:30893573
Abstract

We evaluated the performance of individual trauma triage criteria using data from a regional trauma registry. Los Angeles County (LAC) paramedics use triage criteria adapted from the 2011 Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines to triage injured patients to Trauma Centers (TCs). TCs report outcomes to a LAC EMS registry. We abstracted data for patients 15 years or older from 2013 to 2015 and identified all trauma triage criteria that were met for each encounter. Study outcomes were: (1) "clear need" for a TC, defined as receiving a non-orthopedic operative intervention within 6 hours of arrival, injury severity score (ISS) > 15, or surgical ICU admission; or (2) "no need" for a TC, defined as discharge home from the emergency department (ED). We also defined "possible need" as those patients not discharged home from the ED, inclusive of "clear need" and all other admitted patients. For each individual triage criteria, we calculated the positive likelihood ratios and positive predictive values for TC need. There were 71,536 adult patients in the registry transported by EMS to a LAC TC during the study. Median age was 38 years (IQR 25-55) with 73% male. There were 23,628 (33%) who met "no need" criteria for a TC, leaving 47,908 (67%) patients with "possible need" for a TC, of whom 13,343 patients (19% of total) met "clear need" for a TC. No individual trauma criterion met the a priori likelihood ratio threshold of 10 for predicting "clear need" for a TC. Cardiopulmonary arrest with penetrating torso trauma and flail chest met this threshold for "possible need." In this retrospective analysis, no individual triage criterion definitively identified patients who benefit from transport to a TC. Yet, the majority of patients demonstrated potential benefit for nearly all criteria, supporting CDC recommendations that trauma triage criteria be considered in their entirety, not as individual criterion.

摘要

我们使用区域创伤登记处的数据评估了个体创伤分诊标准的性能。洛杉矶县 (LAC) 护理人员使用改编自 2011 年疾病控制与预防中心 (CDC) 指南的分诊标准将受伤患者分诊到创伤中心 (TC)。TC 向 LAC EMS 登记处报告结果。我们从 2013 年到 2015 年为 15 岁或以上的患者提取数据,并确定了每次就诊符合的所有创伤分诊标准。研究结果为:(1)“明确需要”TC,定义为在到达后 6 小时内接受非骨科手术干预、损伤严重程度评分 (ISS) > 15 或入住外科重症监护病房;或 (2)“不需要”TC,定义为从急诊科 (ED) 出院回家。我们还将“可能需要”定义为从 ED 未出院的患者,包括“明确需要”和所有其他入院患者。对于每个单独的分诊标准,我们计算了 TC 需要的阳性似然比和阳性预测值。 在研究期间,有 71536 名成年患者通过 EMS 被送往 LAC TC。中位数年龄为 38 岁(IQR 25-55),73%为男性。有 23628 人(33%)符合 TC 不需要的标准,留下 47908 人(67%)患者对 TC“可能需要”,其中 13343 人(占总数的 19%)符合 TC“明确需要”。没有单个创伤标准满足预测 TC“明确需要”的先验似然比阈值 10。心肺骤停伴穿透性胸外伤和连枷胸符合“可能需要”的阈值。 在这项回顾性分析中,没有单个分诊标准可以明确确定从 TC 转运中受益的患者。然而,大多数患者表现出对几乎所有标准的潜在益处,支持 CDC 建议将创伤分诊标准作为一个整体而不是单个标准进行考虑。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Trauma Triage Criteria Performance in a Regional Trauma System.区域性创伤系统中创伤分诊标准效能的评估。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;23(6):828-837. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1588444. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
2
Ability of the Physiologic Criteria of the Field Triage Guidelines to Identify Children Who Need the Resources of a Trauma Center.现场分诊指南的生理标准识别需要创伤中心资源的儿童的能力。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Mar-Apr;21(2):180-184. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1233311. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
Does EMS perceived anatomic injury predict trauma center need?EMS 感知的解剖损伤是否可预测创伤中心的需求?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):312-6. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.785620. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
4
Effect of Geriatric-Specific Trauma Triage Criteria on Outcomes in Injured Older Adults: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.老年特异性创伤分诊标准对老年受伤患者结局的影响:一项全州范围的回顾性队列研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):1944-1951. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14376. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
5
Not all mechanisms are created equal: a single-center experience with the national guidelines for field triage of injured patients.并非所有机制都一样:一项全国性受伤患者现场分类指南的单中心经验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):140-5. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3182988ae2.
6
Use of 911 for Rapid Re-Triage of Critical Trauma Patients.使用911对危急创伤患者进行快速重新分诊。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Oct;35(5):488-494. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20000898. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
7
Correlation between field triage criteria and the injury severity score of trauma patients in a French inclusive regional trauma system.法国全覆盖区域创伤体系中创伤患者现场分类标准与创伤严重度评分的相关性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 5;27(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0652-0.
8
Geriatric-specific triage criteria are more sensitive than standard adult criteria in identifying need for trauma center care in injured older adults.老年患者特异性分诊标准在识别受伤老年人对创伤中心护理的需求方面比标准成人标准更敏感。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;65(1):92-100.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
9
Does mechanism of injury predict trauma center need?受伤机制能否预测创伤中心的需求?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):518-25. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.598617.
10
Survival Benefit of Treatment at or Transfer to a Tertiary Trauma Center among Injured Older Adults.老年创伤患者在创伤中心或转入创伤中心治疗的生存获益。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):245-256. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1632997. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A prehospital protocol for transfusion of low-titer O-positive whole blood in patients with hemorrhagic shock in Los Angeles County: Modeling the risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.洛杉矶县出血性休克患者低滴度O型阳性全血输血的院前方案:模拟胎儿和新生儿溶血病风险
Transfusion. 2025 May;65 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S313-S319. doi: 10.1111/trf.18184. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
2
Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review.损伤机制和特殊考虑因素作为严重损伤的预测因素:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;29(9):1106-1117. doi: 10.1111/acem.14489. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
3
Application of trauma time axis management in the treatment of severe trauma patients.
创伤时间轴管理在严重创伤患者治疗中的应用。
Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Feb;24(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
4
Survival Benefit of Treatment at or Transfer to a Tertiary Trauma Center among Injured Older Adults.老年创伤患者在创伤中心或转入创伤中心治疗的生存获益。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):245-256. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1632997. Epub 2019 Jul 16.