• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Personal Identity: Ethical Considerations.非侵入性脑刺激与个人身份:伦理考量
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 7;11:281. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00281. eCollection 2017.
2
Transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation and personal identity: ethical questions, and neuroethical approaches for medical practice.经颅磁刺激、深部脑刺激与个人身份:医学实践中的伦理问题与神经伦理学方法。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;23(5):476-85. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.616189.
3
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
4
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
5
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.尊重患有慢性精神疾病的女性在避孕决策方面的自主权。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;44(7):671-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.7.671.
6
Identity change and informed consent.身份变更与知情同意。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Jun;43(6):384-390. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103684. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
7
Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma.真实性还是自主性?当深部脑刺激引发两难困境时。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Dec;39(12):757-60. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100427. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
8
Autonomy, procedural and substantive: a discussion of the ethics of cognitive enhancement.自主性、程序性和实质性:关于认知增强的伦理讨论。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):729-736. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10110-2. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
9
Transcranial stimulation and cognition.经颅刺激与认知。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:739-50. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00056-5.
10
Brain stimulation for treatment and enhancement in children: an ethical analysis.儿童脑刺激治疗与增强:伦理分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 18;8:953. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00953. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
A Critical Perspective on NeuroRights: Comments Regarding Ethics and Law.对神经权利的批判性视角:关于伦理与法律的评论
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 25;15:703121. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.703121. eCollection 2021.
2
They Affect the Person, but for Better or Worse? Perceptions of Electroceutical Interventions for Depression Among Psychiatrists, Patients, and the Public.它们对人有影响,是好是坏?精神科医生、患者和公众对电疗干预抑郁症的看法。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Nov;31(13):2542-2553. doi: 10.1177/10497323211037642. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
The Future of Technology in Positive Psychology: Methodological Advances in the Science of Well-Being.积极心理学中技术的未来:幸福科学的方法学进展。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 18;9:962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00962. eCollection 2018.
4
Technological Approaches for Neurorehabilitation: From Robotic Devices to Brain Stimulation and Beyond.神经康复的技术方法:从机器人设备到脑刺激及其他
Front Neurol. 2018 Apr 9;9:212. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00212. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuroscience Fiction as Eidolá: Social Reflection and Neuroethical Obligations in Depictions of Neuroscience in Film.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Apr;26(2):292-312. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000578. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
2
An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation.一封关于经颅直流电刺激自助使用者的公开信。
Ann Neurol. 2016 Jul;80(1):1-4. doi: 10.1002/ana.24689.
3
Alteration of Political Belief by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.非侵入性脑刺激对政治信仰的改变
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jan 21;9:621. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00621. eCollection 2015.
4
The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa.用于治疗神经性厌食症的脑深部电刺激的伦理问题
Neuroethics. 2015;8(3):215-230. doi: 10.1007/s12152-015-9240-9. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
5
NEUROSCIENCE. The unknowns of cognitive enhancement.神经科学。认知增强的未知因素。
Science. 2015 Oct 23;350(6259):379-80. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5893.
6
Non-invasive brain stimulation in early rehabilitation after stroke.中风后早期康复中的非侵入性脑刺激
J Med Life. 2015;8 Spec Issue(Spec Issue):52-6.
7
Non-invasive brain stimulation: an interventional tool for enhancing behavioral training after stroke.非侵入性脑刺激:一种用于增强中风后行为训练的干预工具。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 15;9:265. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00265. eCollection 2015.
8
Transcranial direct current stimulation-induced seizure: analysis of a case.经颅直流电刺激诱发癫痫发作:一例病例分析
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015 Apr;46(2):169. doi: 10.1177/1550059414540647.
9
An ethics toolbox for neurotechnology.神经科技伦理学工具箱
Neuron. 2015 Apr 8;86(1):34-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.038.
10
Brain stimulation for treatment and enhancement in children: an ethical analysis.儿童脑刺激治疗与增强:伦理分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 18;8:953. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00953. eCollection 2014.

非侵入性脑刺激与个人身份:伦理考量

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Personal Identity: Ethical Considerations.

作者信息

Iwry Jonathan, Yaden David B, Newberg Andrew B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PA, United States.

Myrna Brind Center for Integrative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 7;11:281. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00281. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00281
PMID:28638327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5461331/
Abstract

As noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technology advances, these methods may become increasingly capable of influencing complex networks of mental functioning. We suggest that these might include cognitive and affective processes underlying personality and belief systems, which would raise important questions concerning personal identity and autonomy. We give particular attention to the relationship between personal identity and belief, emphasizing the importance of respecting users' personal values. We posit that research participants and patients should be encouraged to take an active approach to considering the personal implications of altering their own cognition, particularly in cases of neurocognitive "enhancement." We suggest that efforts to encourage careful consideration through the informed consent process would contribute usefully to studies and treatments that use NIBS.

摘要

随着非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术的进步,这些方法可能越来越有能力影响复杂的心理功能网络。我们认为,这些可能包括人格和信仰系统背后的认知和情感过程,这将引发有关个人身份和自主性的重要问题。我们特别关注个人身份与信仰之间的关系,强调尊重用户个人价值观的重要性。我们假定,应该鼓励研究参与者和患者积极主动地思考改变自身认知的个人影响,尤其是在神经认知“增强”的情况下。我们建议,通过知情同意过程鼓励仔细思考的努力,将对使用NIBS的研究和治疗有益。