Farzanegan Roya, Farzanegan Behrooz, Alehashem Maryam, Zangi Mahdi, Niakan Kalhori Sharareh R, Sheikhy Kambiz, Emami Habib, Behgam Shadmehr Mohammad
Tracheal Diseases Research Center (TDRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung disease (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tanaffos. 2017;16(1):22-33.
Laryngotracheal stenosis as a late complication of prolonged endotracheal intubation is a life-threatening event. In order to determine the related risk factors for this complication, which may vary among different countries, designing a valid questionnaire is necessary. The aim of this study was to select the items and evaluate the face and content validities of a questionnaire developed for assessment of risk factors of post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) in patients admitted in the intensive care unit.
A mixed method study design was used in four steps in 2015, i.e., 1) a literature review, 2) focus groups with five experts in the field, 3) consultations with intensive care unit (ICU) specialists and thoracic surgeons, and 4) evaluation of content and face validity with 15 experts in a scientific panel using two self-administered questionnaires. Content validity index (CVI) was computed for individual items as well as the overall scale.
We extracted the items from different sources of information. An initial version of the 52-item questionnaire was developed and classified into four domains including patient characteristics, intubation features, equipment-drugs, and complications. The items with an excellent modified kappa were included in the questionnaire. Five questions received more criticism instead of support and were removed (Item-CVI<0.55, fair modified kappa). The ones with an Item-CVI > 0.60 and a good modified kappa were revised, merged, or retained. The new 43-item questionnaire found a scale-level CVI, averaging (Scale-CVI/Ave) of 0.91.
The PITS risk factors questionnaire was developed and validated through item selection, expert opinions, and content validity index.
气管插管时间过长导致的喉气管狭窄是一种危及生命的并发症。为了确定这种并发症的相关危险因素(不同国家可能有所不同),设计一份有效的问卷很有必要。本研究的目的是筛选问卷条目,并评估为评估重症监护病房(ICU)患者插管后气管狭窄(PITS)危险因素而编制的问卷的表面效度和内容效度。
2015年采用混合方法研究设计,分四个步骤进行,即:1)文献综述;2)与该领域的五位专家进行焦点小组讨论;3)咨询重症监护病房(ICU)专家和胸外科医生;4)使用两份自填式问卷,由一个科学小组的15位专家对内容效度和表面效度进行评估。计算单个条目以及整个量表的内容效度指数(CVI)。
我们从不同信息来源提取条目。编制了一份初始版本的包含52个条目的问卷,并将其分为四个领域,包括患者特征、插管特征、设备-药物和并发症。具有优秀修正kappa值的条目被纳入问卷。五个问题收到的批评多于支持,因此被删除(条目CVI<0.55,修正kappa值一般)。条目CVI>0.60且修正kappa值良好的问题进行了修订、合并或保留。新的包含43个条目的问卷的量表水平CVI(量表CVI/Ave)平均为0.91。
通过条目筛选、专家意见和内容效度指数,编制并验证了PITS危险因素问卷。