Van den Bossche Jolien, Deben Christophe, Op de Beeck Ken, Deschoolmeester Vanessa, Hermans Christophe, De Pauw Ines, Jacobs Julie, Van Schil Paul, Vermorken Jan Baptist, Pauwels Patrick, Peeters Marc, Lardon Filip, Wouters An
Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
J Cancer. 2017 May 12;8(8):1441-1452. doi: 10.7150/jca.18455. eCollection 2017.
: Currently, prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is based on clinicopathological factors, including TNM stage. However, there are considerable differences in patient outcome within a similar staging group, even when patients received identical treatments. In order to improve prognostic predictions and to guide treatment options, additional parameters influencing outcome are required. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), a master regulator of mitotic cell division and the DNA damage response, is considered as a new potential biomarker in this research area. While several studies reported Plk1 overexpression in a broad range of human malignancies, inconsistent results were published regarding the clinical significance hereof. A prognostic panel, consisting of Plk1 and additional biomarkers that are related to the Plk1 pathway, might further improve prediction of patient prognosis. : In this study, we evaluated for the first time the prognostic value of Plk1 mRNA and protein expression in combination with the mutation status (next generation sequencing), induction of apoptotic cell death (immunohistochemistry for cleaved caspase 3) and hypoxia (immunohistochemistry for carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX)) in 98 NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients. : Both Plk1 mRNA and protein expression and CA IX protein levels were upregulated in the majority of tumor samples. Plk1 mRNA and protein expression levels were higher in mutant samples, suggesting that Plk1 overexpression is, at least partially, the result of loss of functional p53 (<0.05). Interestingly, the outcome of patients with both Plk1 mRNA and CA IX protein overexpression, who also harbored a mutation, was much worse than that of patients with aberrant expression of only one of the three markers (p=0.001). : The combined evaluation of Plk1 mRNA expression, CA IX protein expression and mutations shows promise as a prognostic panel in NSCLC patients. Moreover, these results pave the way for new combination strategies with Plk1 inhibitors.
目前,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预后基于临床病理因素,包括TNM分期。然而,即使患者接受相同的治疗,在相似分期组内患者的预后仍存在显著差异。为了改善预后预测并指导治疗选择,需要其他影响预后的参数。Polo样激酶1(Plk1)是有丝分裂细胞分裂和DNA损伤反应的主要调节因子,在该研究领域被视为一种新的潜在生物标志物。虽然多项研究报道Plk1在多种人类恶性肿瘤中过表达,但关于其临床意义的结果却不一致。由Plk1和其他与Plk1途径相关的生物标志物组成的预后指标可能会进一步改善患者预后的预测。
在本研究中,我们首次评估了98例NSCLC腺癌患者中Plk1 mRNA和蛋白表达与 突变状态(二代测序)、凋亡性细胞死亡诱导(裂解的半胱天冬酶3免疫组化)和缺氧(碳酸酐酶IX(CA IX)免疫组化)相结合的预后价值。
大多数肿瘤样本中Plk1 mRNA和蛋白表达以及CA IX蛋白水平均上调。Plk1 mRNA和蛋白表达水平在 突变样本中更高,表明Plk1过表达至少部分是功能性p53缺失的结果(<0.05)。有趣的是,Plk1 mRNA和CA IX蛋白均过表达且也携带 突变的患者的预后比仅三种标志物之一表达异常的患者差得多(p = 0.001)。
Plk1 mRNA表达、CA IX蛋白表达和 突变的联合评估显示有望成为NSCLC患者的预后指标。此外,这些结果为Plk1抑制剂的新联合策略铺平了道路。