• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在资源有限的环境中使用90%乙醇对听诊器进行消毒。

Use of 90% ethanol to decontaminate stethoscopes in resource limited settings.

作者信息

Raghubanshi Bijendra Raj, Sapkota Supriya, Adhikari Arjab, Dutta Aman, Bhattarai Utsuk, Bhandari Rastriyata

机构信息

KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Imadol, Lalitpur, Nepal.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Jun 15;6:68. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0224-x. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-017-0224-x
PMID:28638595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5472973/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In developing countries like Nepal, 90% ethanol is cheap and is available in most hospitals. The unavailability of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in these settings led us to compare the efficacy between 90% ethanol and isopropyl alcohol pads in reducing the bacterial contamination of diaphragm of stethoscope.

METHODS

A randomized blinded experimental study was carried out to determine the difference between cleaning stethoscopes with 90% ethanol and IPA. Cultures of diaphragm were taken before and after cleaning with one of the cleaning agent. Colony forming units (CFU) count and organism identification was done by a blinded investigator. CFU before and after cleaning were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the decrease in CFU count between the cleaning agents.

RESULTS

About 30% of the stethoscopes harbored potential pathogens. Significant reduction in CFU was observed with both IPA (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, value <0.001) and 90% ethanol (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, value <0.001). Comparing median decrease in CFU between cleaning with IPA and with 90% ethanol, no significant difference was found (Mann Whitney U test; U = 1357, value >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both 90% ethanol and IPA are equally effective in decontaminating the diaphragm of stethoscope. Selection of agent should be done on the basis of cost and availability.

摘要

背景

在尼泊尔这样的发展中国家,90%的乙醇价格便宜,大多数医院都有。在这些地方无法获得异丙醇(IPA),这促使我们比较90%乙醇和异丙醇擦拭巾在减少听诊器膜片细菌污染方面的效果。

方法

进行了一项随机双盲实验研究,以确定用90%乙醇和IPA清洁听诊器之间的差异。在用其中一种清洁剂清洁前后,对膜片进行培养。由一位盲法研究者进行菌落形成单位(CFU)计数和微生物鉴定。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较清洁前后的CFU。使用Mann Whitney U检验比较两种清洁剂之间CFU计数的减少情况。

结果

约30%的听诊器携带潜在病原体。使用IPA(Wilcoxon符号秩检验,P值<0.001)和90%乙醇(Wilcoxon符号秩检验,P值<0.001)均观察到CFU显著减少。比较用IPA和90%乙醇清洁后CFU的中位数减少情况,未发现显著差异(Mann Whitney U检验;U = 1357,P值>0.05)。

结论

90%乙醇和IPA在对听诊器膜片进行消毒方面同样有效。应根据成本和可获得性来选择清洁剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b413/5472973/695e25ed2db9/13756_2017_224_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b413/5472973/34b71cd2ab2d/13756_2017_224_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b413/5472973/695e25ed2db9/13756_2017_224_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b413/5472973/34b71cd2ab2d/13756_2017_224_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b413/5472973/695e25ed2db9/13756_2017_224_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of 90% ethanol to decontaminate stethoscopes in resource limited settings.在资源有限的环境中使用90%乙醇对听诊器进行消毒。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Jun 15;6:68. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0224-x. eCollection 2017.
2
Ethanol-based cleanser versus isopropyl alcohol to decontaminate stethoscopes.基于乙醇的清洁剂与异丙醇用于听诊器消毒的比较
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Apr;37(3):241-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.08.006. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
3
The stethoscope. A potential source of nosocomial infection?听诊器。医院感染的一个潜在来源?
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Apr 14;157(7):786-90. doi: 10.1001/archinte.157.7.786.
4
A prospective, randomised, double-blind study of comparative efficacy of immediate versus daily cleaning of stethoscope using 66% ethyl alcohol.一项使用66%乙醇对听诊器立即清洁与每日清洁的比较疗效的前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
Indian J Med Sci. 2004 Oct;58(10):423-30.
5
Decontamination of stethoscope membranes with chlorhexidine: Should it be recommended?用洗必泰对听诊器膜片进行消毒:是否应予以推荐?
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Nov 1;44(11):e205-e209. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
6
[Bacterial contamination of stethoscopes in hospital].[医院听诊器的细菌污染情况]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2015 Nov-Dec;73(6):723-7. doi: 10.1684/abc.2015.1105.
7
Bacterial contamination of stethoscope chest pieces and the effect of daily cleaning.听诊器胸件的细菌污染与日常清洁的效果。
J Vet Intern Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(2):354-8. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12032. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
8
Microbiological Impacts of Decontamination of Stethoscopes and Assessment of Disinfecting Practices among Physicians in Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Survey.巴基斯坦听诊器消毒的微生物学影响及医生消毒实践评估:一项质量改进调查
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 May 16;107(1):52-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1283.
9
Stethoscope, "the friendly foe" - A study to evaluate bacterial contamination of stethoscopes and disinfection practices.听诊器,“亦敌亦友”——一项评估听诊器细菌污染及消毒措施的研究
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018 Oct 31;12(10):887-893. doi: 10.3855/jidc.10128.
10
Stethoscopes: a potential vector of infection?听诊器:感染的潜在载体?
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Sep;26(3):296-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70075-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of biocidal efficacy of commercial disinfectants used in public, private and workplaces during the pandemic event of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间公共、私人和工作场所使用的商业消毒剂的杀菌功效研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):5468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09575-1.
2
A quasi-experimental study on stethoscopes contamination with multidrug-resistant bacteria: Its role as a vehicle of transmission.一种关于听诊器被多重耐药菌污染的准实验研究:其作为传播媒介的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250455. eCollection 2021.
3
Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Decontamination of stethoscope membranes with chlorhexidine: Should it be recommended?用洗必泰对听诊器膜片进行消毒:是否应予以推荐?
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Nov 1;44(11):e205-e209. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
2
Healthcare Personnel Attire and Devices as Fomites: A Systematic Review.作为污染物的医护人员着装与设备:一项系统综述
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):1367-1373. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.192. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
3
Aerobic Bacteria in the Diaphragmatic Portion of Stethoscope of Medical Professionals of Tertiary Care Hospital.
听诊器消毒方法:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 13;17(6):1856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061856.
4
Molecular analysis of bacterial contamination on stethoscopes in an intensive care unit.重症监护病房听诊器细菌污染的分子分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;40(2):171-177. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.319. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
三级护理医院医务人员听诊器膈区的需氧菌
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2015 Jul-Sep;53(199):166-8.
4
Predictors of Heavy Stethoscope Contamination Following a Physical Examination.体格检查后听诊器重度污染的预测因素。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;37(6):673-9. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.40.
5
[Stethoscope or staphyloscope?: Potential vector in nosocomial infections].听诊器还是葡萄球菌探测仪?:医院感染中的潜在传播媒介
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2016 Feb;33(1):19-25. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182016000100003.
6
Contamination of stethoscopes and physicians' hands after a physical examination.听诊器和医生的手在体检后被污染。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Mar;89(3):291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.016.
7
Bacterial contamination, bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolates from stethoscopes at Jimma University Specialized Hospital.吉姆马大学专科医院听诊器上分离株的细菌污染、细菌谱和抗菌药物敏感性模式。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013 Dec 13;12:39. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-39.
8
Stethoscopes as potential intrahospital carriers of pathogenic microorganisms.听诊器作为医院内潜在的病原微生物携带者。
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Jan;42(1):82-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
9
Automated counting of bacterial colony forming units on agar plates.琼脂平板上细菌菌落形成单位的自动计数。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033695. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
10
Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.发展中国家地方性卫生保健相关感染的负担:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):228-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4. Epub 2010 Dec 9.