Rohlfing Matthew L, Mays Ashley C, Isom Scott, Waltonen Joshua D
Department of Otolaryngology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Otolaryngology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Laryngoscope. 2017 Dec;127(12):2784-2789. doi: 10.1002/lary.26713. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Explore relationship between insurance status and survival, determine outcomes that vary based on insurance status, and identify potential areas of intervention.
Retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent resection of an upper aerodigestive tract malignancy at a single tertiary care hospital during a 5-year period.
Patients were categorized into four groups by insurance status: Medicaid or uninsured, Medicare and under 65 years of age, Medicare and 65 years or older, and private insurance. Data were collected from the medical record and analyzed with respect to survival and other outcomes.
The final cohort consisted of 860 patients. Survival analysis demonstrated a hazard ratio of 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.0) for the Medicaid/uninsured group when compared to the private insurance group. When adjusted for other variables, mortality was still different across insurance groups (P = 0.002). The following also were different across insurance groups: tumor stage (P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < 0.001), length of stay (P < 0.001), and complications (P = 0.021). The Medicaid/uninsured group was most likely to have a complication (odds ratio [OR] = 2.10, 95% CI 1.24-3.56, P = 0.006).
Medicaid/uninsured patients present with more advanced tumors and have poorer survival than privately insured patients. Insurance status is predictive of tumor stage, comorbidity burden, length of stay, and complications. Specifically, the Medicaid/uninsured group had high rates of tobacco use and alcohol abuse, advanced stage tumors, and postoperative complications. Because alcohol abuse and advanced stage also were predictors of poor survival, they may contribute to the survival disparity for socially disadvantaged patients.
探讨保险状况与生存率之间的关系,确定因保险状况而异的结局,并确定潜在的干预领域。
对一家三级医疗中心在5年期间接受上消化道恶性肿瘤切除术的患者进行回顾性队列分析。
根据保险状况将患者分为四组:医疗补助或无保险、65岁以下的医疗保险、65岁及以上的医疗保险以及私人保险。从病历中收集数据,并就生存率和其他结局进行分析。
最终队列包括860名患者。生存分析显示,与私人保险组相比,医疗补助/无保险组的风险比为2.1(95%置信区间[CI],1.5 - 3.0)。在对其他变量进行调整后,不同保险组之间的死亡率仍存在差异(P = 0.002)。不同保险组在以下方面也存在差异:肿瘤分期(P < 0.001)、美国麻醉医师协会评分(P < 0.001)、住院时间(P < 0.001)和并发症(P = 0.021)。医疗补助/无保险组最有可能出现并发症(比值比[OR] = 2.10,95% CI 1.24 - 3.56,P = 0.006)。
医疗补助/无保险患者所患肿瘤更晚期,生存率低于私人保险患者。保险状况可预测肿瘤分期、合并症负担、住院时间和并发症。具体而言,医疗补助/无保险组吸烟和酗酒率高、肿瘤分期晚且术后并发症多。由于酗酒和肿瘤晚期也是生存率低的预测因素,它们可能导致社会弱势群体的生存差异。
4。《喉镜》,127:2784 - 2789,2017年。