• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症中的表型可塑性与细胞命运决定:来自动力系统理论的见解

Phenotypic Plasticity and Cell Fate Decisions in Cancer: Insights from Dynamical Systems Theory.

作者信息

Jia Dongya, Jolly Mohit Kumar, Kulkarni Prakash, Levine Herbert

机构信息

Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.

Graduate Program in Systems, Synthetic and Physical Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2017 Jun 22;9(7):70. doi: 10.3390/cancers9070070.

DOI:10.3390/cancers9070070
PMID:28640191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5532606/
Abstract

Waddington's epigenetic landscape, a famous metaphor in developmental biology, depicts how a stem cell progresses from an undifferentiated phenotype to a differentiated one. The concept of "landscape" in the context of dynamical systems theory represents a high-dimensional space, in which each cell phenotype is considered as an "attractor" that is determined by interactions between multiple molecular players, and is buffered against environmental fluctuations. In addition, biological noise is thought to play an important role during these cell-fate decisions and in fact controls transitions between different phenotypes. Here, we discuss the phenotypic transitions in cancer from a dynamical systems perspective and invoke the concept of "cancer attractors"-hidden stable states of the underlying regulatory network that are not occupied by normal cells. Phenotypic transitions in cancer occur at varying levels depending on the context. Using epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer stem-like properties, metabolic reprogramming and the emergence of therapy resistance as examples, we illustrate how phenotypic plasticity in cancer cells enables them to acquire hybrid phenotypes (such as hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal and hybrid metabolic phenotypes) that tend to be more aggressive and notoriously resilient to therapies such as chemotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy. Furthermore, we highlight multiple factors that may give rise to phenotypic plasticity in cancer cells, such as (a) multi-stability or oscillatory behaviors governed by underlying regulatory networks involved in cell-fate decisions in cancer cells, and (b) network rewiring due to conformational dynamics of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) that are highly enriched in cancer cells. We conclude by discussing why a therapeutic approach that promotes "recanalization", i.e., the exit from "cancer attractors" and re-entry into "normal attractors", is more likely to succeed rather than a conventional approach that targets individual molecules/pathways.

摘要

沃丁顿的表观遗传景观是发育生物学中一个著名的隐喻,它描绘了干细胞如何从未分化表型发展为分化表型。在动力系统理论背景下,“景观”概念代表一个高维空间,其中每个细胞表型被视为一个“吸引子”,由多个分子参与者之间的相互作用决定,并能抵御环境波动。此外,生物噪声被认为在这些细胞命运决定过程中起重要作用,实际上控制着不同表型之间的转变。在这里,我们从动力系统角度讨论癌症中的表型转变,并引入“癌症吸引子”的概念——即潜在调控网络的隐藏稳定状态,正常细胞不会占据这些状态。癌症中的表型转变根据具体情况发生在不同水平。以上皮-间质转化(EMT)、癌症干细胞样特性、代谢重编程和治疗抗性的出现为例,我们说明了癌细胞中的表型可塑性如何使它们获得混合表型(如上皮/间质混合表型和代谢混合表型),这些表型往往更具侵袭性,并且对化疗和雄激素剥夺疗法等治疗具有 notoriously 的抗性。此外,我们强调了可能导致癌细胞表型可塑性的多个因素,例如(a)由癌细胞命运决定中涉及的潜在调控网络控制的多稳定性或振荡行为,以及(b)由于癌细胞中高度富集的内在无序蛋白(IDP)的构象动力学导致的网络重连。我们通过讨论为什么促进“再通”的治疗方法,即从“癌症吸引子”退出并重新进入“正常吸引子”,比针对单个分子/途径的传统方法更有可能成功来结束本文。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c53/5532606/cf93874ec724/cancers-09-00070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c53/5532606/43207044fb05/cancers-09-00070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c53/5532606/552ebe84e1d4/cancers-09-00070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c53/5532606/cf93874ec724/cancers-09-00070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c53/5532606/43207044fb05/cancers-09-00070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c53/5532606/552ebe84e1d4/cancers-09-00070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c53/5532606/cf93874ec724/cancers-09-00070-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Phenotypic Plasticity and Cell Fate Decisions in Cancer: Insights from Dynamical Systems Theory.癌症中的表型可塑性与细胞命运决定:来自动力系统理论的见解
Cancers (Basel). 2017 Jun 22;9(7):70. doi: 10.3390/cancers9070070.
2
Phenotypic plasticity in prostate cancer: role of intrinsically disordered proteins.前列腺癌中的表型可塑性:内在无序蛋白的作用。
Asian J Androl. 2016 Sep-Oct;18(5):704-10. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.183570.
3
Modeling the epigenetic attractors landscape: toward a post-genomic mechanistic understanding of development.构建表观遗传吸引子景观模型:迈向对发育的后基因组机制理解。
Front Genet. 2015 Apr 23;6:160. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00160. eCollection 2015.
4
Implications of the Hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal Phenotype in Metastasis.混合上皮/间充质表型在转移中的意义。
Front Oncol. 2015 Jul 20;5:155. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00155. eCollection 2015.
5
[Dynamic paradigm in psychopathology: "chaos theory", from physics to psychiatry].[精神病理学中的动态范式:“混沌理论”,从物理学到精神病学]
Encephale. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):260-8.
6
Landscape of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity as an emergent property of coordinated teams in regulatory networks.作为调控网络中协调团队的涌现特性,上皮-间充质可塑性的全景
Elife. 2022 Oct 21;11:e76535. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76535.
7
A Monte Carlo method for in silico modeling and visualization of Waddington's epigenetic landscape with intermediate details.一种具有中间细节的 Waddington 表观遗传景观的计算机建模和可视化的蒙特卡罗方法。
Biosystems. 2020 Dec;198:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104275. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
8
Phenotypic Plasticity and Cancer: A System Biology Perspective.表型可塑性与癌症:系统生物学视角
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 23;13(15):4302. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154302.
9
NFATc Acts as a Non-Canonical Phenotypic Stability Factor for a Hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal Phenotype.NFATc作为上皮/间充质混合表型的非典型表型稳定性因子。
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 8;10:553342. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.553342. eCollection 2020.
10
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalized cancer treatment strategies incorporating irreversible and reversible drug resistance mechanisms.纳入不可逆和可逆耐药机制的个性化癌症治疗策略。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):70. doi: 10.1038/s41540-025-00547-5.
2
Operating principles of interconnected feedback loops driving cell fate transitions.驱动细胞命运转变的相互连接反馈回路的运作原理。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2025 Jan 2;11(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41540-024-00483-w.
3
Cell State Transition Models Stratify Breast Cancer Cell Phenotypes and Reveal New Therapeutic Targets.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinguishing mechanisms underlying EMT tristability.区分上皮-间质转化三稳态背后的机制。
Cancer Converg. 2017;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41236-017-0005-8. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
Inflammatory breast cancer: a model for investigating cluster-based dissemination.炎性乳腺癌:一种用于研究基于簇的播散的模型。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Jun 6;3:21. doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0023-9. eCollection 2017.
3
Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance.罕见细胞变异性和药物诱导的重编程作为癌症耐药的一种模式。
细胞状态转变模型对乳腺癌细胞表型进行分层并揭示新的治疗靶点。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;16(13):2354. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132354.
4
A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies.计算细胞周期模型在指导癌症治疗策略中的综合综述。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024 Jul 5;10(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s41540-024-00397-7.
5
Engineering principles for rationally design therapeutic strategies against hepatocellular carcinoma.合理设计抗肝细胞癌治疗策略的工程学原理。
Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Jun 13;11:1404319. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1404319. eCollection 2024.
6
Insights into the cell fate decision-making processes from chromosome structural reorganizations.从染色体结构重组看细胞命运决定过程
Biophys Rev (Melville). 2022 Dec 16;3(4):041402. doi: 10.1063/5.0107663. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Intrinsically disordered proteins: Ensembles at the limits of Anfinsen's dogma.内在无序蛋白质:处于安芬森法则极限的集合体。
Biophys Rev (Melville). 2022 Mar 17;3(1):011306. doi: 10.1063/5.0080512. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
The Killer's Web: Interconnection between Inflammation, Epigenetics and Nutrition in Cancer.《杀手的网络:癌症中炎症、表观遗传学和营养之间的相互关联》
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 27;25(5):2750. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052750.
9
Contribution of Autophagy to Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition Induction during Cancer Progression.自噬在癌症进展过程中对上皮-间质转化诱导的作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 16;16(4):807. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040807.
10
Epigenetic regulation in cancer.癌症中的表观遗传调控。
MedComm (2020). 2024 Feb 19;5(2):e495. doi: 10.1002/mco2.495. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Nature. 2017 Jun 15;546(7658):431-435. doi: 10.1038/nature22794. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
4
EMT and MET: necessary or permissive for metastasis?上皮-间质转化和间质-上皮转化:转移的必要条件还是允许条件?
Mol Oncol. 2017 Jul;11(7):755-769. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12083. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Operating principles of tristable circuits regulating cellular differentiation.调节细胞分化的三稳态电路的工作原理。
Phys Biol. 2017 May 23;14(3):035007. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/aa6f90.
6
Multistage modeling of protein dynamics with monomeric Myc oncoprotein as an example.以单体 Myc 癌蛋白为例的蛋白质动力学多级建模。
Phys Rev E. 2017 Mar;95(3-1):032406. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.032406. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
7
EMT, CSCs, and drug resistance: the mechanistic link and clinical implications.上皮-间质转化、癌症干细胞与耐药性:机制联系及临床意义
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;14(10):611-629. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.44. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
8
Interrogating the topological robustness of gene regulatory circuits by randomization.通过随机化探究基因调控回路的拓扑鲁棒性
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Mar 31;13(3):e1005456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005456. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
Targeting the Metabolic Reprogramming That Controls Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Aggressive Tumors.针对控制侵袭性肿瘤上皮-间质转化的代谢重编程
Front Oncol. 2017 Mar 14;7:40. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00040. eCollection 2017.
10
Metabolic re-wiring of isogenic breast epithelial cell lines following epithelial to mesenchymal transition.基因相同的乳腺上皮细胞系在发生上皮间质转化后的代谢重编程。
Cancer Lett. 2017 Jun 28;396:117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 18.