Wallner Lauren P, Li Yun, McLeod M Chandler, Hamilton Ann S, Ward Kevin C, Veenstra Christine M, An Lawrence C, Janz Nancy K, Katz Steven J, Hawley Sarah T
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Cancer. 2017 Oct 15;123(20):3895-3903. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30848. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Little is known about the size and characteristics of the decision-support networks of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and whether their involvement improves breast cancer treatment decisions.
A population-based sample of patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer in 2014 and 2015, as reported to the Georgia and Los Angeles Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries, were surveyed approximately 7 months after diagnosis (N = 2502; response rate, 68%). Network size was estimated by asking women to list up to 3 of the most important decision-support persons (DSPs) who helped them with locoregional therapy decisions. Decision deliberation was measured using 4 items assessing the degree to which patients thought through the decision, with higher scores reflecting more deliberative breast cancer treatment decisions. The size of the network (range, 0-3 or more) was compared across patient-level characteristics, and adjusted mean deliberation scores were estimated across levels of network size using multivariable linear regression.
Of the 2502 women included in this analysis, 51% reported having 3 or more DSPs, 20% reported 2, 18% reported 1, and 11% reported not having any DSPs. Married/partnered women, those younger than 45 years, and black women all were more likely to report larger network sizes (all P < .001). Larger support networks were associated with more deliberative surgical treatment decisions (P < .001).
Most women engaged multiple DSPs in their treatment decision making, and involving more DSPs was associated with more deliberative treatment decisions. Future initiatives to improve treatment decision making among women with breast cancer should acknowledge and engage informal DSPs. Cancer 2017;123:3895-903. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
对于新诊断出乳腺癌的女性的决策支持网络的规模和特征,以及她们的参与是否能改善乳腺癌治疗决策,人们了解甚少。
以2014年和2015年新诊断出乳腺癌的患者为基于人群的样本,这些患者已向佐治亚州和洛杉矶监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处报告,在诊断后约7个月进行了调查(N = 2502;应答率为68%)。通过要求女性列出最多3位在局部区域治疗决策方面帮助她们的最重要的决策支持人员(DSP)来估计网络规模。使用4个项目测量决策审议情况,这些项目评估患者对决策的思考程度,得分越高表明乳腺癌治疗决策越审慎。比较不同患者层面特征的网络规模(范围为0至3个或更多),并使用多变量线性回归估计不同网络规模水平下的调整后平均审议得分。
在纳入本次分析的2502名女性中,51%报告有3个或更多的DSP,20%报告有2个,18%报告有1个,11%报告没有任何DSP。已婚/有伴侣的女性、45岁以下的女性以及黑人女性都更有可能报告有更大的网络规模(所有P < 0.001)。更大的支持网络与更审慎的手术治疗决策相关(P < 0.001)。
大多数女性在治疗决策中会涉及多个DSP,且涉及更多的DSP与更审慎的治疗决策相关。未来改善乳腺癌女性治疗决策的举措应认可并让非正式的DSP参与进来。《癌症》2017年;123:3895 - 903。© 2017美国癌症协会。