• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高通量 DNA 测序法用于确定苏必利尔湖河口粪便细菌的来源。

A High-Throughput DNA-Sequencing Approach for Determining Sources of Fecal Bacteria in a Lake Superior Estuary.

机构信息

BioTechnology Institute and ‡Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota , Saint Paul, Minnesota 55455, United States.

Natural Resources Research Institute and ∥Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth , Duluth, Minnesota 55812, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Aug 1;51(15):8263-8271. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01353. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b01353
PMID:28640599
Abstract

Current microbial source-tracking (MST) methods, employed to determine sources of fecal contamination in waterways, use molecular markers targeting host-associated bacteria in animal or human feces. However, there is a lack of knowledge about fecal microbiome composition in several animals and imperfect marker specificity and sensitivity. To overcome these issues, a community-based MST method has been developed. Here, we describe a study done in the Lake Superior-Saint Louis River estuary using SourceTracker, a program that calculates the source contribution to an environment. High-throughput DNA sequencing of microbiota from a diverse collection of fecal samples obtained from 11 types of animals (wild, agricultural, and domesticated) and treated effluent (n = 233) was used to generate a fecal library to perform community-based MST. Analysis of 319 fecal and environmental samples revealed that the community compositions in water and fecal samples were significantly different, allowing for the determination of the presence of fecal inputs and identification of specific sources. SourceTracker results indicated that fecal bacterial inputs into the Lake Superior estuary were primarily attributed to wastewater effluent and, to a lesser extent, geese and gull wastes. These results suggest that a community-based MST method may be another useful tool for determining sources of aquatic fecal bacteria.

摘要

当前用于确定水道中粪便污染来源的微生物源追踪(MST)方法,使用针对动物或人类粪便中与宿主相关细菌的分子标记。然而,对于几种动物的粪便微生物组组成、标记特异性和敏感性不完美,我们知之甚少。为了克服这些问题,已经开发了一种基于群落的 MST 方法。在这里,我们描述了在苏必利尔湖-圣路易斯河河口进行的一项研究,该研究使用了 SourceTracker,这是一种计算环境中来源贡献的程序。从 11 种动物(野生、农业和家养)和处理废水(n = 233)获得的各种粪便样本的高通量 DNA 测序用于生成粪便库,以进行基于群落的 MST。对 319 个粪便和环境样本的分析表明,水样和粪便样本的群落组成有显著差异,这使得能够确定粪便输入的存在并识别特定来源。SourceTracker 的结果表明,粪便细菌输入苏必利尔湖河口主要归因于废水处理厂,其次是鹅和海鸥的粪便。这些结果表明,基于群落的 MST 方法可能是另一种确定水生粪便细菌来源的有用工具。

相似文献

1
A High-Throughput DNA-Sequencing Approach for Determining Sources of Fecal Bacteria in a Lake Superior Estuary.高通量 DNA 测序法用于确定苏必利尔湖河口粪便细菌的来源。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Aug 1;51(15):8263-8271. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01353. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
2
Influence of Library Composition on SourceTracker Predictions for Community-Based Microbial Source Tracking.文库组成对基于社区的微生物源追踪的 SourceTracker 预测的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jan 2;53(1):60-68. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04707. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
3
Sequence-enabled community-based microbial source tracking in surface waters using machine learning classification: A review.基于机器学习分类的序列可识别地表水社区微生物源追踪:综述。
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 Oct;177:106050. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106050. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
4
Use of barcoded pyrosequencing and shared OTUs to determine sources of fecal bacteria in watersheds.利用条码焦磷酸测序和共享 OTUs 确定流域粪便细菌的来源。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Oct 15;44(20):7777-82. doi: 10.1021/es101500z.
5
Into the deep: Evaluation of SourceTracker for assessment of faecal contamination of coastal waters.深入探究:用于评估沿海水域粪便污染的SourceTracker评估
Water Res. 2016 Apr 15;93:242-253. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
6
Source tracking using microbial community fingerprints: Method comparison with hydrodynamic modelling.利用微生物群落指纹图谱进行源追踪:与水动力建模方法的比较。
Water Res. 2017 Feb 1;109:253-265. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.043. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
7
Toolbox Approaches Using Molecular Markers and 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Data Sets for Identification of Fecal Pollution in Surface Water.利用分子标记和16S rRNA基因扩增子数据集识别地表水中粪便污染的工具箱方法
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct;81(20):7067-77. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02032-15. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
8
Next-generation sequencing reveals fecal contamination and potentially pathogenic bacteria in a major inflow river of Taihu Lake.下一代测序技术揭示了太湖主要入湖河流中的粪便污染和潜在致病细菌。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Nov;254(Pt B):113108. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113108. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Environmental risk assessment for fecal contamination sources in urban and peri-urban estuaries, in Escambia and Santa Rosa counties, FL, USA.美国佛罗里达州埃斯坎比亚和圣罗莎县城市和近岸河口粪便污染来源的环境风险评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jun 21;195(7):867. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11478-1.
10
Identification of fecal contamination sources in water using host-associated markers.利用宿主相关标记物鉴定水中粪便污染来源。
Can J Microbiol. 2013 Mar;59(3):210-20. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2012-0618. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for Wildland Fire Smoke Transport of Microbes from Terrestrial Sources to the Atmosphere and Back.关于野火烟雾将微生物从陆地来源传输到大气并再返回的证据。
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2024 Sep 9;129(9). doi: 10.1029/2024JG008236.
2
Identifying potential introduced and natural sources of pollution in Delaware watersheds.识别特拉华河流域潜在的人为污染和天然污染源。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Dec 18;90(12):e0195824. doi: 10.1128/aem.01958-24. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
3
Exploring the Bacterial Community in Aged Fecal Sources from Dairy Cows: Impacts on Fecal Source Tracking.
探索奶牛老龄粪便源中的细菌群落:对粪便源追踪的影响
Microorganisms. 2023 Apr 28;11(5):1161. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051161.
4
Microbial Source Tracking in the Love Creek Watershed, Delaware (USA).美国特拉华州洛夫溪流域的微生物源追踪
Dela J Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;7(1):22-31. doi: 10.32481/djph.2021.01.006. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Microbial Diversity Profiling of Gut Microbiota of Using Three Hypervariable Regions of the Bacterial 16S rRNA.利用细菌16S rRNA的三个高变区对肠道微生物群进行微生物多样性分析。
Microorganisms. 2021 Aug 12;9(8):1721. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081721.
6
A Combined Digital PCR and Next Generation DNA-Sequencing Based Approach for Tracking Nearshore Pollutant Dynamics Along the Southwest United States/Mexico Border.一种基于数字PCR和下一代DNA测序的组合方法,用于追踪美国西南部/墨西哥边境近岸污染物动态。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Aug 6;12:674214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.674214. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiomes From Wild Waterbirds to Poultry, Cattle, Pigs, and Wastewater Treatment Plants for a Microbial Source Tracking Approach.用于微生物源追踪方法的野生水鸟与家禽、牛、猪及污水处理厂粪便微生物群的比较分析
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 14;12:697553. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.697553. eCollection 2021.
8
Synergistic Application of Molecular Markers and Community-Based Microbial Source Tracking Methods for Identification of Fecal Pollution in River Water During Dry and Wet Seasons.分子标记与基于群落的微生物源追踪方法在干湿季河水粪便污染识别中的协同应用
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 14;12:660368. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.660368. eCollection 2021.
9
FORENSIC: an Online Platform for Fecal Source Identification.法医鉴定:一个用于粪便来源识别的在线平台。
mSystems. 2020 Mar 17;5(2):e00869-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00869-19.
10
High-throughput DNA sequencing technologies for water and wastewater analysis.高通量 DNA 测序技术在水和废水分析中的应用。
Sci Prog. 2019 Dec;102(4):351-376. doi: 10.1177/0036850419881855. Epub 2019 Oct 15.