• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习在预测精神分裂症住院患者攻击行为中的应用。

Application of machine learning in predicting aggressive behaviors from hospitalized patients with schizophrenia.

作者信息

Cheng Nuo, Guo Meihao, Yan Fang, Guo Zhengjun, Meng Jun, Ning Kui, Zhang Yanping, Duan Zitian, Han Yong, Wang Changhong

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Department of Infection Prevention and Control, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 20;14:1016586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1016586. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1016586
PMID:37020730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10067917/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish a predictive model of aggressive behaviors from hospitalized patients with schizophrenia through applying multiple machine learning algorithms, to provide a reference for accurately predicting and preventing of the occurrence of aggressive behaviors.

METHODS

The cluster sampling method was used to select patients with schizophrenia who were hospitalized in our hospital from July 2019 to August 2021 as the survey objects, and they were divided into an aggressive behavior group (611 cases) and a non-aggressive behavior group (1,426 cases) according to whether they experienced obvious aggressive behaviors during hospitalization. Self-administered General Condition Questionnaire, Insight and Treatment Attitude Questionnaire (ITAQ), Family APGAR (Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, Resolve) Questionnaire (APGAR), Social Support Rating Scale Questionnaire (SSRS) and Family Burden Scale of Disease Questionnaire (FBS) were used for the survey. The Multi-layer Perceptron, Lasso, Support Vector Machine and Random Forest algorithms were used to build a predictive model for the occurrence of aggressive behaviors from hospitalized patients with schizophrenia and to evaluate its predictive effect. Nomogram was used to build a clinical application tool.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the Multi-Layer Perceptron, Lasso, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest were 0.904 (95% CI: 0.877-0.926), 0.901 (95% CI: 0.874-0.923), 0.902 (95% CI: 0.876-0.924), and 0.955 (95% CI: 0.935-0.970), where the AUCs of the Random Forest and the remaining three models were statistically different ( < 0.0001), and the remaining three models were not statistically different in pair comparisons ( > 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models can fairly predict aggressive behaviors in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia, among which Random Forest has the best predictive effect and has some value in clinical application.

摘要

目的

通过应用多种机器学习算法,建立精神分裂症住院患者攻击行为的预测模型,为准确预测和预防攻击行为的发生提供参考。

方法

采用整群抽样法,选取2019年7月至2021年8月在我院住院的精神分裂症患者作为调查对象,根据其在住院期间是否出现明显攻击行为分为攻击行为组(611例)和非攻击行为组(1426例)。采用自行编制的一般情况问卷、自知力与治疗态度问卷(ITAQ)、家庭功能评定问卷(APGAR)、社会支持评定量表问卷(SSRS)和家庭疾病负担量表问卷(FBS)进行调查。运用多层感知器、套索、支持向量机和随机森林算法建立精神分裂症住院患者攻击行为发生的预测模型并评估其预测效果。采用列线图构建临床应用工具。

结果

多层感知器、套索、支持向量机和随机森林的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积值分别为0.904(95%CI:0.877-0.926)、0.901(95%CI:0.874-0.923)、0.902(95%CI:0.876-0.924)和0.955(95%CI:0.935-0.970),其中随机森林与其余三个模型的AUC有统计学差异(<0.0001),其余三个模型两两比较无统计学差异(>0.5)。

结论

机器学习模型能够较好地预测精神分裂症住院患者的攻击行为,其中随机森林预测效果最佳,具有一定临床应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/3d570763986d/fpsyt-14-1016586-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/5f95ad8dfaa9/fpsyt-14-1016586-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/9cad63ed6167/fpsyt-14-1016586-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/24475a9f4b8f/fpsyt-14-1016586-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/7a73a689d46f/fpsyt-14-1016586-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/3d570763986d/fpsyt-14-1016586-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/5f95ad8dfaa9/fpsyt-14-1016586-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/9cad63ed6167/fpsyt-14-1016586-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/24475a9f4b8f/fpsyt-14-1016586-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/7a73a689d46f/fpsyt-14-1016586-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c9/10067917/3d570763986d/fpsyt-14-1016586-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of machine learning in predicting aggressive behaviors from hospitalized patients with schizophrenia.机器学习在预测精神分裂症住院患者攻击行为中的应用。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 20;14:1016586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1016586. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Prediction of Hospitalized Patients with Schizophrenia.机器学习算法在预测住院精神分裂症患者中的比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;22(7):2517. doi: 10.3390/s22072517.
3
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
4
The predictive effect of different machine learning algorithms for pressure injuries in hospitalized patients: A network meta-analyses.不同机器学习算法对住院患者压力性损伤的预测效果:一项网状Meta分析。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 2;8(11):e11361. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11361. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?机器学习算法能否预测丹麦膝关节置换登记处的早期翻修 TKA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2088-2101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001343.
6
Development and Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model to Estimate Delirium Risk in Newly Hospitalized Patients Without Known Cognitive Impairment.基于电子病历的机器学习模型开发与验证:用于预测无已知认知障碍的新入院患者发生谵妄的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1018.
7
Classification of suicide attempters in schizophrenia using sociocultural and clinical features: A machine learning approach.使用社会文化和临床特征对精神分裂症自杀未遂者进行分类:一种机器学习方法。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;47:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
8
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
9
Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Large Vessel Occlusion Before Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习预测机械取栓前大血管闭塞的临床转归。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2379-2388. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025411. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
10
Application of machine learning models for predicting acute kidney injury following donation after cardiac death liver transplantation.机器学习模型在预测心脏死亡后肝移植供体急性肾损伤中的应用。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2021 Jun;20(3):222-231. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of a troublemaking risk assessment tool for patients with severe mental disorders in community of China.中国社区重度精神障碍患者肇事肇祸风险评估工具的构建
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84486-x.
2
Machine Learning for prediction of violent behaviors in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review.机器学习用于预测精神分裂症谱系障碍中的暴力行为:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 21;15:1384828. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1384828. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of violence in male schizophrenia using sMRI, based on machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的男性精神分裂症患者暴力行为的 sMRI 预测。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 1;22(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04331-1.
2
The Prediction and Influential Factors of Violence in Male Schizophrenia Patients With Machine Learning Algorithms.基于机器学习算法的男性精神分裂症患者暴力行为的预测及影响因素
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 11;13:799899. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.799899. eCollection 2022.
3
Identification of violent patients with schizophrenia using a hybrid machine learning approach at the individual level.
基于个体水平的混合机器学习方法识别具有精神分裂症的暴力患者。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Dec;306:114294. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114294. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
4
The relation of integrated psychological therapy to resting state functional brain connectivity networks in patients with schizophrenia.综合心理治疗与精神分裂症患者静息态功能脑连接网络的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Dec;306:114270. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114270. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
Construction of embedded fMRI resting-state functional connectivity networks using manifold learning.使用流形学习构建嵌入式功能磁共振成像静息态功能连接网络
Cogn Neurodyn. 2021 Aug;15(4):585-608. doi: 10.1007/s11571-020-09645-y. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
6
Retrospective Study on the Influencing Factors and Prediction of Hospitalization Expenses for Chronic Renal Failure in China Based on Random Forest and LASSO Regression.基于随机森林和 LASSO 回归的中国慢性肾衰竭住院费用影响因素及预测的回顾性研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;9:678276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.678276. eCollection 2021.
7
Prevalence and severity of verbal, physical, and sexual inpatient violence against nurses in Swiss psychiatric hospitals and associated nurse-related characteristics: Cross-sectional multicentre study.瑞士精神病院护士遭受言语、身体和性侵犯的发生率和严重程度,以及与护士相关的特征:横断面多中心研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Dec;30(6):1550-1563. doi: 10.1111/inm.12905. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
Violent and non-violent offending in patients with schizophrenia: Exploring influences and differences via machine learning.精神分裂症患者的暴力和非暴力犯罪:通过机器学习探索影响和差异。
Compr Psychiatry. 2021 May;107:152238. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152238. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
ISOMAP and machine learning algorithms for the construction of embedded functional connectivity networks of anatomically separated brain regions from resting state fMRI data of patients with Schizophrenia.用于从精神分裂症患者静息态功能磁共振成像数据构建解剖学上分离的脑区嵌入式功能连接网络的等距映射(ISOMAP)和机器学习算法。
AIMS Neurosci. 2021 Feb 19;8(2):295-321. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021016. eCollection 2021.
10
Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis.贝叶斯反应优化作为化学合成的工具。
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7844):89-96. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03213-y. Epub 2021 Feb 3.