Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of South West Jutland, Denmark.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):958-969. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006645. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Because of fundamental differences in healthcare systems, US readmission data cannot be extrapolated to the European setting: To investigate the opinions of readmitted patients, their carers, nurses and physicians on predictability and preventability of readmissions and using majority consensus to determine contributing factors that could potentially foresee (preventable) readmissions.
Prospective observational study. Readmitted patients, their carers, and treating professionals were surveyed during readmission to assess the discharge process and the predictability and preventability of the readmission. Cohen's Kappa measured pairwise agreement of considering readmission as predictable/preventable by patients, carers and professionals. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regressionidentified factors associated with predictability/preventability.
15 hospitals in four European countries PARTICIPANTS: 1398 medical patients readmitted unscheduled within 30 days MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: (1) Agreement between the interviewed groups on considering readmissions likely predictable or preventable;(2) Factors distinguishing predictable from non-predictable and preventable from non-preventable readmissions.
The majority deemed 27.8% readmissions potentially predictable and 14.4% potentially preventable. The consensus on predictability and preventability was poor, especially between patients and professionals (kappas ranged from 0.105 to 0.173). The interviewed selected different factors as potentially associated with predictability and preventability. When a patient reported that he was ready for discharge during index admission, the readmission was deemed less likely by the majority (predictability: OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.75; preventability: OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.49).
There is no consensus between readmitted patients, their carers and treating professionals about predictability and preventability of readmissions, nor associated risk factors. A readmitted patient reporting not feeling ready for discharge at index admission was strongly associated with preventability/predictability. Therefore, healthcare workers should question patients' readiness to go home timely before discharge.
由于医疗保健系统存在根本差异,美国再入院数据不能推断至欧洲环境:调查再入院患者、其护理人员、护士和医生对再入院的可预测性和可预防性的意见,并采用多数共识来确定可能预见(可预防)再入院的因素。
前瞻性观察性研究。在再入院期间对再入院患者、其护理人员和治疗专业人员进行调查,以评估出院过程以及再入院的可预测性和可预防性。用 Cohen's Kappa 测量患者、护理人员和专业人员认为再入院可预测/可预防的一致性。随后,多变量逻辑回归确定与可预测性/可预防性相关的因素。
四个欧洲国家的 15 家医院
在 30 天内非计划再入院的 1398 名内科患者
(1)受访者群体对再入院可能性可预测或可预防的看法的一致性;(2)区分可预测和不可预测以及可预防和不可预防再入院的因素。
大多数人认为 27.8%的再入院有潜在的可预测性,14.4%的再入院有潜在的可预防性。可预测性和可预防性的共识很差,尤其是在患者和专业人员之间(kappa 值范围为 0.105 至 0.173)。受访者选择了不同的因素作为潜在的可预测性和可预防性的相关因素。当患者在指数住院期间报告自己准备好出院时,大多数人认为再入院不太可能(可预测性:OR 0.55;95%CI 0.40 至 0.75;可预防性:OR 0.35;95%CI 0.24 至 0.49)。
再入院患者、其护理人员和治疗专业人员之间对再入院的可预测性和可预防性以及相关的风险因素没有共识。再入院患者在指数住院期间报告自己未准备好出院与可预防性/可预测性密切相关。因此,医护人员应在出院前及时询问患者是否准备好回家。