• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接触无法解决的变位词会损害爱荷华赌博任务的表现。

Exposure to Unsolvable Anagrams Impairs Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.

作者信息

Starcke Katrin, Agorku Janet D, Brand Matthias

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-EssenDuisburg, Germany.

Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance ImagingEssen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun 8;11:114. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00114. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00114
PMID:28642693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5462929/
Abstract

Recent research indicates that external manipulations, such as stress or mood induction, can affect decision-making abilities. In the current study, we investigated whether the exposure to an unsolvable task affected subsequent performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Participants were randomly assigned to a condition in which they were exposed to unsolvable anagrams ( = 20), or a condition in which they worked on solvable anagrams ( = 22). Afterwards, all participants played the Iowa Gambling Task, a prominent task that measures decision making under uncertain conditions with no explicit rules for gains and losses. In this task, it is essential to process feedback from previous decisions. The results demonstrated that participants who worked on unsolvable anagrams made more disadvantageous decisions on the Iowa Gambling Task than the other participants. In addition, a significant gender effect was observed: Males who worked on unsolvable anagrams made a more disadvantageous decisions than the other male participants. Females who worked on unsolvable anagrams also made more disadvantageous decision than the other female participants, but differences were small and not significant. We conclude that the exposure to unsolvable anagrams induced the experience of uncontrollability which can elicit stress and learned helplessness. Stress and learned helplessness might have reduced the ability to learn from the given feedback, particularly in male participants. We assume that in real life, uncontrollable challenges that last longer than a single experimental manipulation can affect decision making severely, at least in males.

摘要

近期研究表明,外部操控,如压力或情绪诱导,会影响决策能力。在本研究中,我们调查了接触无法解决的任务是否会影响后续在爱荷华赌博任务中的表现。参与者被随机分配到一个条件组,在该条件组中他们接触无法解决的字谜(n = 20),或被分配到另一个条件组,在该条件组中他们处理可解决的字谜(n = 22)。之后,所有参与者都进行了爱荷华赌博任务,这是一个著名的任务,用于测量在无明确得失规则的不确定条件下的决策。在这个任务中,处理先前决策的反馈至关重要。结果表明,处理无法解决字谜的参与者在爱荷华赌博任务中做出的不利决策比其他参与者更多。此外,观察到显著的性别效应:处理无法解决字谜的男性比其他男性参与者做出更不利的决策。处理无法解决字谜的女性也比其他女性参与者做出更不利的决策,但差异较小且不显著。我们得出结论,接触无法解决的字谜会引发无法控制的体验,进而引发压力和习得性无助感。压力和习得性无助感可能会降低从给定反馈中学习的能力,尤其是在男性参与者中。我们假设在现实生活中,持续时间超过单次实验操控的无法控制的挑战会严重影响决策,至少对男性而言如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1022/5462929/c275220ae38a/fnbeh-11-00114-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1022/5462929/791d04052c8f/fnbeh-11-00114-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1022/5462929/a50de205b1f0/fnbeh-11-00114-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1022/5462929/c275220ae38a/fnbeh-11-00114-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1022/5462929/791d04052c8f/fnbeh-11-00114-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1022/5462929/a50de205b1f0/fnbeh-11-00114-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1022/5462929/c275220ae38a/fnbeh-11-00114-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Exposure to Unsolvable Anagrams Impairs Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.接触无法解决的变位词会损害爱荷华赌博任务的表现。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun 8;11:114. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00114. eCollection 2017.
2
Cerebral blood flow changes in limbic regions induced by unsolvable anagram tasks.无法解决的字谜任务诱导的边缘脑区脑血流变化。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Feb;153(2):206-12. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.2.206.
3
Experimentally-induced learned helplessness in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.青少年 1 型糖尿病习得性无助的实验诱导。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 May;35(4):405-14. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp061. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
4
Learned helplessness and learned resourcefulness: effects of noncontingent success and failure on individuals differing in self-control skills.习得性无助与习得性足智多谋:非偶然性成功和失败对自我控制技能不同个体的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Jan;48(1):198-215. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.48.1.198.
5
Effects of personal and universal helplessness upon self-esteem.个人无助感和普遍无助感对自尊的影响。
Psychol Rep. 1990 Dec;67(3 Pt 1):963-72. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3.963.
6
Functional neuroimaging of the Iowa Gambling Task in older adults.老年人爱荷华赌博任务的功能性神经成像
Neuropsychology. 2014 Nov;28(6):870-80. doi: 10.1037/neu0000120. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
Sex-Differences, Handedness, and Lateralization in the Iowa Gambling Task.爱荷华赌博任务中的性别差异、利手性与偏侧化
Front Psychol. 2016 May 31;7:708. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00708. eCollection 2016.
8
Effects of conceptual task difficulty on generalized persistence.概念任务难度对广义持续性的影响。
Am J Psychol. 1980 Jun;93(2):285-98.
9
Increases in Emotional Intelligence After an Online Training Program Are Associated With Better Decision-Making on the Iowa Gambling Task.在线培训项目后情商的提高与爱荷华赌博任务中更好的决策相关。
Psychol Rep. 2019 Jun;122(3):853-879. doi: 10.1177/0033294118771705. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Decision-making impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis: a case-control study.多发性硬化症患者的决策障碍:一项病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 29;4(7):e004918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004918.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of Self-Regulatory Decline in Accusatorial Interrogations.指控性审讯中自我调节能力下降的机制。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 19;15(8):1125. doi: 10.3390/bs15081125.
2
Cross-species comparison of rodent and human decision-making in the Iowa Gambling Task in select neurological and psychiatric disorders: translational approach to examine age- and sex-specific effects of stress and corticolimbic perturbations.在特定神经和精神疾病的爱荷华赌博任务中啮齿动物与人类决策的跨物种比较:用于研究压力和皮质边缘系统扰动的年龄和性别特异性影响的转化方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 22;16:1551477. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1551477. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Test-Retest Reliability of Common Behavioral Decision Making Tasks.常见行为决策任务的重测信度
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Feb 1;33(1):125-129. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx038.
2
Effects of Acute Stress on Decision Making.急性应激对决策的影响。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2017 Mar;42(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10484-016-9347-8.
3
Strong interactions between learned helplessness and risky decision-making in a rat gambling model.在大鼠赌博模型中,习得性无助与冒险决策之间存在强烈相互作用。
The impact of induced stress on reactive and proactive control in depression.
诱导应激对抑郁症中反应性和主动性控制的影响。
PeerJ. 2025 Jan 13;13:e18821. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18821. eCollection 2025.
4
Decision-Making and Risk-Propensity Changes during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间及之后的决策制定与风险倾向变化
Brain Sci. 2023 May 12;13(5):793. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050793.
5
Why Being 'Stressed' Is 'Desserts' in Reverse-The Effect of Acute Psychosocial Stress on Food Pleasure and Food Choice.为何“压力”状态与“享受甜点”相反——急性心理社会压力对食物愉悦感和食物选择的影响
Foods. 2022 Jun 15;11(12):1756. doi: 10.3390/foods11121756.
6
Core Neuropsychological Measures for Obesity and Diabetes Trials: Initial Report.肥胖与糖尿病试验的核心神经心理学测量:初步报告。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:554127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554127. eCollection 2020.
7
Country and Sex Differences in Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Risk.不确定性和风险下决策中的国家与性别差异
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 20;11:486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00486. eCollection 2020.
8
Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).压力下的表现:爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)的眼动追踪研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Sep 24;12:217. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00217. eCollection 2018.
9
Let's call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function.我们还是全盘放弃吧:评估执行功能中的性别和性差异。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jan;44(1):86-96. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0179-5. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 18;6:37304. doi: 10.1038/srep37304.
4
Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis.压力对不确定性下决策的影响:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):909-933. doi: 10.1037/bul0000060.
5
Effects of Acute Laboratory Stress on Executive Functions.急性实验室应激对执行功能的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;7:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00461. eCollection 2016.
6
A pilot study to investigate the induction and manipulation of learned helplessness in healthy adults.一项在健康成年人中探究习得性无助的诱导与操控的初步研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Nov 30;219(3):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.045. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
7
Dynamic adaptation of large-scale brain networks in response to acute stressors.大脑网络在急性应激源作用下的动态适应。
Trends Neurosci. 2014 Jun;37(6):304-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
8
A critical review of sex differences in decision-making tasks: focus on the Iowa Gambling Task.决策任务中性别差异的批判性回顾:以爱荷华赌博任务为重点。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Feb 1;238:95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
9
Both Risk and Reward are Processed Differently in Decisions Made Under Stress.在压力下做出的决策中,风险和回报的处理方式有所不同。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;21(2):36-41. doi: 10.1177/0963721411429452.
10
Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept.重新审视压力:对压力概念的批判性评价。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Apr;35(5):1291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Feb 21.