• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针灸治疗病例报告的报告质量现状：韩国核心期刊分析

The Current Status of Quality of Reporting in Acupuncture Treatment Case Reports: An Analysis of the Core Journal in Korea.

作者信息

Kim Jeongjoo, Eom Yoon-Ji, Lee Ye-Seul, Nam Dongwoo, Chae Younbyoung

机构信息

Acupuncture and Meridian Science Research Center, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:5810372. doi: 10.1155/2017/5810372. Epub 2017 May 31.

DOI:10.1155/2017/5810372
PMID:28642800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5469983/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to evaluate the overall quality of case reports concerning acupuncture treatment in Korea.

METHODS

We selected a representative Korean journal and retrieved eligible case reports on acupuncture treatment published from 2009 to 2015. We assessed the quality of reporting based on CAse REport (CARE) and STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) guideline checklists.

RESULTS

A total of 93 eligible case reports of acupuncture treatment were identified among the 107 articles screened. Overall quality of reporting in the case reports was generally acceptable (75.4% on CARE, 67.7% on STRICTA), but several crucial items remained substantially underreported.

CONCLUSIONS

Endorsement of the CARE and STRICTA guidelines is needed to improve the completeness of reporting. Our findings will be helpful in developing a more appropriate reporting guideline for case reports in acupuncture treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估韩国有关针灸治疗的病例报告的整体质量。

方法

我们选取了一份具有代表性的韩国期刊，并检索了2009年至2015年发表的关于针灸治疗的合格病例报告。我们根据病例报告（CARE）和针灸临床试验报告干预标准（STRICTA）指南清单评估报告质量。

结果

在筛选的107篇文章中，共确定了93篇合格的针灸治疗病例报告。病例报告的整体报告质量总体上可以接受（CARE为75.4%，STRICTA为67.7%），但几个关键项目的报告仍然严重不足。

结论

需要认可CARE和STRICTA指南以提高报告的完整性。我们的研究结果将有助于制定更合适的针灸治疗病例报告指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86a/5469983/379670de7c1c/ECAM2017-5810372.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86a/5469983/379670de7c1c/ECAM2017-5810372.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86a/5469983/379670de7c1c/ECAM2017-5810372.001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Current Status of Quality of Reporting in Acupuncture Treatment Case Reports: An Analysis of the Core Journal in Korea.针灸治疗病例报告的报告质量现状：韩国核心期刊分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:5810372. doi: 10.1155/2017/5810372. Epub 2017 May 31.
2
Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines.使用CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估韩国文献中针灸随机对照试验的报告质量。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 29;4(7):e005068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005068.
3
Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.提高韩国传统医学期刊随机对照试验报告质量的认可：一项系统评价
Trials. 2014 Nov 5;15:429. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-429.
4
Assessment of reporting completeness in acupuncture studies on patients with functional constipation using the STRICTA guidelines.采用 STRICTA 指南评估功能性便秘患者接受针刺治疗的研究报告完整性。
Complement Ther Med. 2022 Nov;70:102849. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102849. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
5
STRICTA: is it time to do more?严格标准：是时候做得更多了吗？
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Jun 20;15:190. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0714-4.
6
Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT statement.修订后的针刺临床试验干预报告标准（STRICTA）：扩展 CONSORT 声明。
J Evid Based Med. 2010 Aug;3(3):140-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2010.01086.x.
7
A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials.对STRICTA和CONSORT建议对针灸试验报告质量影响的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2008 Feb 13;3(2):e1577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001577.
8
Assessment of Reporting Quality in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Primary Insomnia with CONSORT Statement and STRICTA Guidelines.使用CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估针刺治疗原发性失眠随机对照试验的报告质量
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Feb 17;2022:5157870. doi: 10.1155/2022/5157870. eCollection 2022.
9
Improving the quality of reporting acupuncture interventions: describing the collaboration between STRICTA, CONSORT and the Chinese Cochrane Centre.提高针灸干预报告质量：描述 STRICTA、CONSORT 与中国 Cochrane 中心之间的合作。
J Evid Based Med. 2009 Feb;2(1):57-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01008.x.
10
Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement.修订后的针刺临床试验干预报告标准（STRICTA）：扩展 CONSORT 声明。
Acupunct Med. 2010 Jun;28(2):83-93. doi: 10.1136/aim.2009.001370. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Completeness of reporting for COVID-19 case reports, January to April 2020: a meta-epidemiologic study.2020 年 1 月至 4 月 COVID-19 病例报告的报告完整性：一项meta 流行病学研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Mar 30;9(1):E295-E301. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200140. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
2
Current status of case reports and case series reported by Korean Medicine doctors in primary clinics: A systematic review.韩医基层诊所医生报告的病例报告和病例系列的现状：一项系统评价。
Integr Med Res. 2020 Dec;9(4):100417. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100417. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
3
Completeness of reporting of case reports in high-impact medical journals.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of touch in acupuncture treatment.触摸在针灸治疗中的作用。
Acupunct Med. 2017 Apr;35(2):148-152. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2016-011178. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
2
More than : Spatial Patterns of Acupuncture-Induced Bodily Sensations.不止如此：针刺引起的身体感觉的空间模式。
Front Neurosci. 2016 Oct 19;10:462. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00462. eCollection 2016.
3
Impact evaluation of CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines on reporting quality for randomized controlled trials of acupuncture conducted in China.《CONSORT和STRICTA指南对中国进行的针灸随机对照试验报告质量的影响评估》
高影响力医学期刊中病例报告的报告完整性。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Apr;50(4):e13215. doi: 10.1111/eci.13215. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
4
Revealing Associations between Diagnosis Patterns and Acupoint Prescriptions Using Medical Data Extracted from Case Reports.利用从病例报告中提取的医学数据揭示诊断模式与穴位处方之间的关联。
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 11;8(10):1663. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101663.
Chin J Integr Med. 2017 Jan;23(1):10-17. doi: 10.1007/s11655-016-2451-z. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
4
Do the CONSORT and STRICTA Checklists Improve the Reporting Quality of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese Journals? A Systematic Review and Analysis of Trends.CONSORT和STRICTA清单能否提高中文期刊发表的针灸随机对照试验的报告质量？一项系统评价及趋势分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147244. eCollection 2016.
5
Urgent need to improve the quality of case report in traditional Chinese medicine: Assessment on reporting quality of 3,417 cases.亟待提高中医病例报告质量：对3417例病例报告质量的评估
Chin J Integr Med. 2016 Jun;22(6):473-80. doi: 10.1007/s11655-015-2250-y. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
6
Consensus-based recommendations for case report in Chinese medicine (CARC).基于共识的中医病例报告推荐意见（CARC）。
Chin J Integr Med. 2016 Jan;22(1):73-9. doi: 10.1007/s11655-015-2121-6. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
7
A Modern Clinical Approach of the Traditional Korean Saam Acupuncture.韩国传统三元针灸的现代临床应用方法
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:703439. doi: 10.1155/2015/703439. Epub 2015 Oct 11.
8
Data Mining of Acupoint Characteristics from the Classical Medical Text: DongUiBoGam of Korean Medicine.从经典医学文本中挖掘穴位特征：《东医宝鉴》中的韩国医学。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:329563. doi: 10.1155/2014/329563. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
When pain is not only pain: inserting needles into the body evokes distinct reward-related brain responses in the context of a treatment.当疼痛不只是疼痛时：在治疗背景下，将针刺入身体会引发与奖赏相关的独特大脑反应。
Physiol Behav. 2015 Mar 1;140:148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.030. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.提高韩国传统医学期刊随机对照试验报告质量的认可：一项系统评价
Trials. 2014 Nov 5;15:429. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-429.