Suppr超能文献

饮食失调检查问卷总体分量表能否充分预测肥胖成年人日常生活中的饮食失调心理病理学情况?

Does the eating disorder examination questionnaire global subscale adequately predict eating disorder psychopathology in the daily life of obese adults?

作者信息

Mason Tyler B, Smith Kathryn E, Crosby Ross D, Wonderlich Stephen A, Crow Scott J, Engel Scott G, Peterson Carol B

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, 120 8th Street S, Fargo, ND, 58103, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, ND, USA.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2018 Aug;23(4):521-526. doi: 10.1007/s40519-017-0410-0. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

Abstract

The eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q) Global score is a self-report measure of global eating disorder (ED) psychopathology. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to evaluate the ecological validity of EDE-Q Global scores among obese adults. Fifty obese adults completed the EDE-Q and 2 weeks of EMA ratings prior to initiating eating episodes and subsequently after eating episodes. EMA items assessed behavioral symptoms [i.e., loss of control (LOC) eating and overeating] and cognitive symptoms (i.e., weight/shape concerns, eating concerns, and restraint). EDE-Q Global was associated with increased EMA weight/shape concerns and fear of LOC at pre-eating recordings. EDE-Q Global was associated with increased EMA post-episode weight/shape concerns, eating concerns, LOC eating, and overeating. There was no association between EDE-Q Global and EMA restraint. Results generally supported the ecological validity of EDE-Q Global scores. Future studies of ED psychopathology in obese adults may benefit from considering EDE-Q Restraint separately. Level of Evidence Level V, descriptive study.

摘要

饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)总体得分是一种对饮食失调(ED)总体精神病理学的自我报告测量方法。本研究采用生态瞬时评估(EMA)来评估EDE-Q总体得分在肥胖成年人中的生态效度。50名肥胖成年人在开始进食前及进食后完成了EDE-Q问卷和为期2周的EMA评分。EMA项目评估行为症状[即失控(LOC)进食和暴饮暴食]和认知症状(即对体重/体型的关注、对饮食的关注和克制)。在进食前记录中,EDE-Q总体得分与EMA中对体重/体型的关注度增加以及对LOC的恐惧相关。EDE-Q总体得分与EMA进食后对体重/体型的关注度增加、对饮食的关注、LOC进食和暴饮暴食相关。EDE-Q总体得分与EMA克制之间无关联。结果总体上支持了EDE-Q总体得分的生态效度。未来对肥胖成年人ED精神病理学的研究可能会受益于单独考虑EDE-Q克制。证据水平:V级,描述性研究。

相似文献

9
The reliability of the Eating Disorder Examination-Self-Report Questionnaire Version (EDE-Q).饮食失调检查自评问卷版本(EDE-Q)的可靠性。
Int J Eat Disord. 1999 Apr;25(3):349-51. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199904)25:3<349::aid-eat15>3.0.co;2-m.

引用本文的文献

1
Loss of control in binge-eating disorder: Fear and resignation.暴食障碍中的失控:恐惧与听天由命。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Jun;56(6):1199-1206. doi: 10.1002/eat.23929. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
8
Examining the ecological validity of the Power of Food Scale.检验食物力量量表的生态效度。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Mar;26(2):717-721. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00871-1. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验