Suppr超能文献

检验食物力量量表的生态效度。

Examining the ecological validity of the Power of Food Scale.

作者信息

Howard Lindsay M, Heron Kristin E, Smith Kathryn E, Crosby Ross D, Engel Scott G, Wonderlich Stephen A, Mason Tyler B

机构信息

The Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA.

Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Mar;26(2):717-721. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00871-1. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Appetite for palatable foods may impact eating-related behaviors in everyday life. The present study evaluated the real-world predictive validity of the Power of Food Scale (PFS) using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).

METHODS

30 women who reported binge eating completed the PFS and related measures. Subsequently, during a 14-day assessment period, participants completed five daily EMA surveys of appetite and binge eating via text message and web.

RESULTS

Results of generalized estimating equations showed that higher PFS scores were associated with higher momentary levels of hunger, eagerness to eat, and urge to eat but were unrelated to fullness, preoccupation with thoughts of food, and binge eating.

CONCLUSION

This study supported the ecological validity of the PFS by demonstrating its association with momentary measures of appetite in everyday life using EMA. Although the PFS may not be predictive of binge eating, future research should investigate PFS as a dispositional moderator, and explore associations between the PFS and overeating (i.e., binge eating without the loss of control component) and loss of control eating in non-clinical samples.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, multiple time series.

摘要

目的

对美味食物的食欲可能会影响日常生活中与饮食相关的行为。本研究使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)评估了食物力量量表(PFS)在现实世界中的预测效度。

方法

30名报告有暴饮暴食行为的女性完成了PFS及相关测量。随后,在为期14天的评估期内,参与者通过短信和网络完成了五项关于食欲和暴饮暴食的每日EMA调查。

结果

广义估计方程的结果显示,较高的PFS得分与较高的瞬时饥饿水平、进食渴望和进食冲动相关,但与饱腹感、对食物的过度关注和暴饮暴食无关。

结论

本研究通过使用EMA证明PFS与日常生活中食欲的瞬时测量之间的关联,支持了PFS的生态效度。尽管PFS可能无法预测暴饮暴食,但未来的研究应将PFS作为一种特质调节因素进行调查,并探索PFS与非临床样本中的暴饮暴食(即无失控成分的暴饮暴食)和失控进食之间的关联。

证据水平

四级,多个时间序列。

相似文献

1
Examining the ecological validity of the Power of Food Scale.检验食物力量量表的生态效度。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Mar;26(2):717-721. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00871-1. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
3
Hedonic hunger and binge eating among women with eating disorders.进食障碍女性的享乐性饥饿和暴食。
Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Apr;47(3):273-80. doi: 10.1002/eat.22171. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
10
Somatic symptoms and binge eating in women's daily lives.女性日常生活中的躯体症状和暴食行为。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Aug;135:110161. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110161. Epub 2020 May 27.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Development of an ecological momentary assessment scale for appetite.食欲的生态瞬时评估量表的开发。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2015 Jan 15;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13030-014-0029-6. eCollection 2015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验