Howard Lindsay M, Heron Kristin E, Smith Kathryn E, Crosby Ross D, Engel Scott G, Wonderlich Stephen A, Mason Tyler B
The Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Mar;26(2):717-721. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00871-1. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
Appetite for palatable foods may impact eating-related behaviors in everyday life. The present study evaluated the real-world predictive validity of the Power of Food Scale (PFS) using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).
30 women who reported binge eating completed the PFS and related measures. Subsequently, during a 14-day assessment period, participants completed five daily EMA surveys of appetite and binge eating via text message and web.
Results of generalized estimating equations showed that higher PFS scores were associated with higher momentary levels of hunger, eagerness to eat, and urge to eat but were unrelated to fullness, preoccupation with thoughts of food, and binge eating.
This study supported the ecological validity of the PFS by demonstrating its association with momentary measures of appetite in everyday life using EMA. Although the PFS may not be predictive of binge eating, future research should investigate PFS as a dispositional moderator, and explore associations between the PFS and overeating (i.e., binge eating without the loss of control component) and loss of control eating in non-clinical samples.
Level IV, multiple time series.
对美味食物的食欲可能会影响日常生活中与饮食相关的行为。本研究使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)评估了食物力量量表(PFS)在现实世界中的预测效度。
30名报告有暴饮暴食行为的女性完成了PFS及相关测量。随后,在为期14天的评估期内,参与者通过短信和网络完成了五项关于食欲和暴饮暴食的每日EMA调查。
广义估计方程的结果显示,较高的PFS得分与较高的瞬时饥饿水平、进食渴望和进食冲动相关,但与饱腹感、对食物的过度关注和暴饮暴食无关。
本研究通过使用EMA证明PFS与日常生活中食欲的瞬时测量之间的关联,支持了PFS的生态效度。尽管PFS可能无法预测暴饮暴食,但未来的研究应将PFS作为一种特质调节因素进行调查,并探索PFS与非临床样本中的暴饮暴食(即无失控成分的暴饮暴食)和失控进食之间的关联。
四级,多个时间序列。