Suppr超能文献

[结直肠癌手术中微创手术的优缺点]

[Advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive surgery in colorectal cancer surgery].

作者信息

Zheng Minhua, Ma Junjun

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery; Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Clinical Center, Shanghai 200025, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;20(6):601-605.

Abstract

Since the emergence of minimally invasive technology twenty years ago, as a surgical concept and surgical technique for colorectal cancer surgery, its obvious advantages have been recognized. Laparoscopic technology, as one of the most important technology platform, has got a lot of evidence-based support for the oncological safety and effectiveness in colorectal cancer surgery Laparoscopic technique has advantages in terms of identification of anatomic plane and autonomic nerve, protection of pelvic structure, and fine dissection of vessels. But because of the limitation of laparoscopic technology there are still some deficiencies and shortcomings, including lack of touch and lack of stereo vision problems, in addition to the low rectal cancer, especially male, obese, narrow pelvis, larger tumors, it is difficult to get better view and manipulating triangle in laparoscopy. However, the emergence of a series of new minimally invasive technology platform is to make up for the defects and deficiencies. The robotic surgical system possesses advantages, such as stereo vision, higher magnification, manipulator wrist with high freedom degree, filtering of tremor and higher stability, but still has disadvantages, such as lack of haptic feedback, longer operation time, high operation cost and expensive price. 3D system of laparoscopic surgery has similar visual experience and feelings as robotic surgery in the 3D view, the same operating skills as 2D laparoscopy and a short learning curve. The price of 3D laparoscopy is also moderate, which makes the 3D laparoscopy more popular in China. Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) by changing the traditional laparoscopic pelvic surgery approach, may have certain advantages for male cases with narrow pelvic and patients with large tumor, and it is in accordance with the technical concept of natural orifice, with less minimally invasive and better cosmetics, which can be regarded as a supplemental technique of the traditional laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal carcinoma. However, this technology also has its own shortcomings, including difficulty getting a high ligation of vessels, difficulty exploring the abdominal cavity, and longer learning curve than laparoscopy. We believe that with the continuous progress and development of technology, continuous improvement and innovation of equipment platform, more organ functions will be protected in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer without compromising the safety and oncological effectiveness.

摘要

自二十年前微创技术出现以来,作为一种用于结直肠癌手术的外科理念和手术技术,其明显优势已得到认可。腹腔镜技术作为最重要的技术平台之一,在结直肠癌手术的肿瘤学安全性和有效性方面获得了大量循证支持。腹腔镜技术在解剖平面和自主神经的识别、盆腔结构的保护以及血管的精细解剖方面具有优势。但由于腹腔镜技术的局限性,仍存在一些不足和缺点,包括缺乏触觉和立体视觉问题,此外对于低位直肠癌,尤其是男性、肥胖、骨盆狭窄、肿瘤较大的患者,在腹腔镜下难以获得更好的视野和操作三角区。然而,一系列新的微创技术平台的出现弥补了这些缺陷和不足。机器人手术系统具有立体视觉、更高放大倍数、高自由度的操作手腕、震颤过滤和更高稳定性等优势,但仍存在缺乏触觉反馈、手术时间长、手术成本高和价格昂贵等缺点。腹腔镜手术的3D系统在三维视野方面具有与机器人手术相似的视觉体验和感受,具有与二维腹腔镜相同的操作技巧且学习曲线短。3D腹腔镜的价格也适中,这使得3D腹腔镜在中国更受欢迎。经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)通过改变传统的腹腔镜盆腔手术入路,对于骨盆狭窄的男性病例和肿瘤较大的患者可能具有一定优势,并且符合自然腔道的技术理念,微创性较小且美容效果更好,可被视为传统腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的一种补充技术。然而,这项技术也有其自身的缺点,包括血管高位结扎困难、腹腔探查困难以及学习曲线比腹腔镜更长。我们相信,随着技术的不断进步和发展,设备平台的不断改进和创新,在不影响直肠癌腹腔镜手术安全性和肿瘤学有效性的前提下,将能更好地保护更多器官功能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验