Matono Takashi, Kutsuna Satoshi, Kato Yasuyuki, Katanami Yuichi, Yamamoto Kei, Takeshita Nozomi, Hayakawa Kayoko, Kanagawa Shuzo, Kaku Mitsuo, Ohmagari Norio
Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Diagnostics, Internal Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179814. eCollection 2017.
The lack of characteristic clinical findings and accurate diagnostic tools has made the diagnosis of enteric fever difficult. We evaluated the classic signs of relative bradycardia and eosinopenia as diagnostic predictors for enteric fever among travellers who had returned from the tropics or subtropics.
This matched case-control study used data from 2006 to 2015 for culture-proven enteric fever patients as cases. Febrile patients (>38.3°C) with non-enteric fever, who had returned from the tropics or subtropics, were matched to the cases in a 1:3 ratio by age (±3 years), sex, and year of diagnosis as controls. Cunha's criteria were used for relative bradycardia. Absolute eosinopenia was defined as an eosinophilic count of 0/μL.
Data from 160 patients (40 cases and 120 controls) were analysed. Cases predominantly returned from South Asia (70% versus 18%, p <0.001). Relative bradycardia (88% versus 51%, p <0.001) and absolute eosinopenia (63% versus 38%, p = 0.008) were more frequent in cases than controls. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, return from South Asia (aOR: 21.6; 95% CI: 7.17-64.9) and relative bradycardia (aOR: 11.7; 95% CI: 3.21-42.5) were independent predictors for a diagnosis of enteric fever. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.00 (95% CI: 2.58-6.20) for return from South Asia, 1.72 (95% CI: 1.39-2.13) for relative bradycardia, and 1.63 (95%CI: 1.17-2.27) for absolute eosinopenia. The negative predictive values of the three variables were notably high (83-92%);. however, positive predictive values were 35-57%.
The classic signs of relative bradycardia and eosinopenia were not specific for enteric fever; however both met the criteria for being diagnostic predictors for enteric fever. Among febrile returned travellers, relative bradycardia and eosinopenia should be re-evaluated for predicting a diagnosis of enteric fever in non-endemic areas prior to obtaining blood cultures.
缺乏特征性临床症状和准确的诊断工具使得肠热病的诊断变得困难。我们评估了相对心动过缓和嗜酸性粒细胞减少这两个典型体征作为从热带或亚热带地区归来的旅行者中肠热病诊断预测指标的价值。
这项配对病例对照研究使用了2006年至2015年确诊为肠热病患者的培养数据作为病例。从热带或亚热带地区归来的非肠热病发热患者(体温>38.3°C),按照年龄(±3岁)、性别和诊断年份以1:3的比例与病例进行配对作为对照。使用库尼亚标准判断相对心动过缓。绝对嗜酸性粒细胞减少定义为嗜酸性粒细胞计数为0/μL。
分析了160例患者的数据(40例病例和120例对照)。病例主要来自南亚(70% 对18%,p<0.001)。病例组相对心动过缓(88% 对51%,p<0.001)和绝对嗜酸性粒细胞减少(63% 对38%,p = 0.008)的发生率高于对照组。在多因素logistic回归分析中,从南亚归来(调整后比值比:21.6;95%置信区间:7.17 - 64.9)和相对心动过缓(调整后比值比:11.7;95%置信区间:3.21 - 42.5)是肠热病诊断的独立预测因素。从南亚归来的阳性似然比为4.00(95%置信区间:2.58 - 6.20),相对心动过缓为1.72(95%置信区间:1.39 - 2.13),绝对嗜酸性粒细胞减少为1.63(95%置信区间:1.17 - 2.27)。这三个变量的阴性预测值显著较高(83 - 92%);然而,阳性预测值为35 - 57%。
相对心动过缓和嗜酸性粒细胞减少这两个典型体征对肠热病并无特异性;然而,两者均符合作为肠热病诊断预测指标所需的标准。在发热的归国旅行者中,在进行血培养之前,应重新评估相对心动过缓和嗜酸性粒细胞减少情况,以预测非流行地区的肠热病诊断。