• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估健康研究对健康政策的影响:加纳多德瓦健康研究中心的一项研究。

Assessing the impact of health research on health policies: a study of the Dodowa Health Research Centre, Ghana.

作者信息

Escribano-Ferrer Blanca, Webster Jayne, Gyapong Margaret

机构信息

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Dodowa Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Dodowa, Ghana.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 24;17(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2383-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2383-0
PMID:28645276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5482934/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of assessing research impact is increasingly recognised. Ghana has a long tradition of research dating from the 1970s. In the Ghana Health Service there are three health research centres under the Research and Development Division. Dodowa Health Research Centre (DHRC) is the youngest in the country dating from the 1990s. The objective of this study is to analyse the influence of the research conducted in DHRC on national and local health policies.

METHODS

The study used the Research Impact Framework. Six projects were selected based on a set of criteria. Thirteen interviews were conducted with researchers and policy makers using a semi-structured interview guide.

RESULTS

DHRC had numerous policy impacts in terms of researchers participating in policy networks, increasing political capital and influencing policy documents. Factors identified to be associated with policy impact included collaboration with policy makers at the design stage, addressing health priorities, and communicating results mainly through the participation in annual review meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

DHRC was successful in influencing health policies. Recommendations were made that could be included in the DHRC strategic planning to improve the research process and its policy impact.

摘要

背景

评估研究影响力的重要性日益受到认可。加纳自20世纪70年代起就有悠久的研究传统。在加纳卫生服务局的研究与发展司下属有三个卫生研究中心。多杜瓦卫生研究中心(DHRC)是该国最年轻的研究中心,可追溯到20世纪90年代。本研究的目的是分析DHRC开展的研究对国家和地方卫生政策的影响。

方法

本研究采用研究影响框架。根据一套标准选择了六个项目。使用半结构化访谈指南对研究人员和政策制定者进行了13次访谈。

结果

就研究人员参与政策网络、增加政治资本和影响政策文件而言,DHRC产生了诸多政策影响。确定与政策影响相关的因素包括在设计阶段与政策制定者合作、解决卫生优先事项以及主要通过参加年度审查会议来传达研究结果。

结论

DHRC成功地影响了卫生政策。提出了一些建议,可纳入DHRC的战略规划,以改进研究过程及其政策影响。

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of health research on health policies: a study of the Dodowa Health Research Centre, Ghana.评估健康研究对健康政策的影响:加纳多德瓦健康研究中心的一项研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 24;17(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2383-0.
2
Achieving Sustainability and Scale-Up of Mobile Health Noncommunicable Disease Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Views of Policy Makers in Ghana.实现撒哈拉以南非洲移动医疗非传染性疾病干预措施的可持续性和扩大规模:加纳政策制定者的观点。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 3;7(5):e11497. doi: 10.2196/11497.
3
Getting research to the policy table: a qualitative study with public health researchers on engaging with policy makers.将研究成果引入政策议程:一项针对公共卫生研究人员与政策制定者互动的定性研究
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Apr 30;12:E56. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140546.
4
Process, pitfalls and profits: lessons from interviewing New Zealand policy-makers.过程、陷阱与收益:采访新西兰政策制定者的经验教训
Health Promot Int. 2018 Apr 1;33(2):187-194. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw065.
5
How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study.研究人员和政策制定者之间的循证生成伙伴关系如何在实践中实施?一项定性访谈研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 15;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0441-2.
6
The challenge of bridging the gap between researchers and policy makers: experiences of a Health Policy Research Group in engaging policy makers to support evidence informed policy making in Nigeria.弥合研究人员与政策制定者之间差距的挑战:一个卫生政策研究小组在促使政策制定者支持尼日利亚循证政策制定方面的经验。
Global Health. 2016 Nov 4;12(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0209-1.
7
Regional-based Integrated Healthcare Network policy in Brazil: from formulation to practice.巴西基于地区的综合医疗保健网络政策:从制定到实践。
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Jul;30(6):705-17. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu048. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
8
How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation?背景如何影响卫生服务规划、提供和评估中的协作决策?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:545. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0545-x.
9
The role of policy actors and contextual factors in policy agenda setting and formulation: maternal fee exemption policies in Ghana over four and a half decades.政策行为体和背景因素在政策议程设定与制定中的作用:加纳四十五年多来的产妇费用豁免政策
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 May 30;13:27. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0016-9.
10
National policy-makers speak out: are researchers giving them what they need?国家政策制定者发声:研究人员是否提供了他们所需的信息?
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jan;26(1):73-82. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq020. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-referral Rectal Artesunate Treatment by Community-Based Treatment Providers in Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Tanzania, and Uganda (Study 18): A Cluster-Randomized Trial.加纳、几内亚比绍、坦桑尼亚和乌干达的社区治疗提供者进行的转诊前直肠青蒿琥酯治疗(研究18):一项整群随机试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 15;63(suppl 5):S312-S321. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw631.
2
"Even if the test result is negative, they should be able to tell us what is wrong with us": a qualitative study of patient expectations of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria.“即使检测结果为阴性,他们也应该能够告诉我们我们出了什么问题”:对疟疾快速诊断检测的患者期望的定性研究。
Malar J. 2013 Jul 22;12:258. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-258.
3
Impact of community management of fever (using antimalarials with or without antibiotics) on childhood mortality: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Ghana.发热的社区管理(使用或不使用抗生素的抗疟药)对儿童死亡率的影响:加纳的一项整群随机对照试验
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):11-20. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0078.
4
Is home management of fevers a cost-effective way of reducing under-five mortality in Africa? The case of a rural Ghanaian District.家庭管理发热是否是降低非洲五岁以下儿童死亡率的一种具有成本效益的方法?加纳农村地区的案例。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Aug;17(8):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03018.x. Epub 2012 May 30.
5
Measuring the payback of research activities: a feasible ex-post evaluation methodology in epidemiology and public health.衡量研究活动的回报:流行病学和公共卫生领域可行的事后评估方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.044. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
6
Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature.组织和政策领域中的知识交流过程:文献的叙述性系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):444-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00608.x.
7
How can malaria rapid diagnostic tests achieve their potential? A qualitative study of a trial at health facilities in Ghana.疟疾快速诊断检测如何发挥其潜力?加纳卫生机构试验的定性研究。
Malar J. 2010 Apr 14;9:95. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-95.
8
Rapid testing for malaria in settings where microscopy is available and peripheral clinics where only presumptive treatment is available: a randomised controlled trial in Ghana.在具备显微镜检查条件的环境和仅有经验性治疗的外围诊所中快速检测疟疾:加纳的一项随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 5;340:c930. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c930.
9
Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review.跨学科和多学科研究的评估:一项文献综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010.
10
Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature.知识转移与交流:文献综述与综合
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):729-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x.