Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jan;26(1):73-82. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq020. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
The objective of this empirical study was to understand the perspectives and attitudes of policy-makers towards the use and impact of research in the health sector in low- and middle-income countries. The study used data from 83 semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted with purposively selected policy-makers at the national level in Argentina, Egypt, Iran, Malawi, Oman and Singapore. The interviews were structured around an interview guide developed based on existing literature and in consultation with all six country investigators. Transcripts were processed using a thematic-analysis approach. Policy-makers interviewed for this study were unequivocal in their support for health research and the high value they attribute to it. However, they stated that there were structural and informal barriers to research contributing to policy processes, to the contribution research makes to knowledge generally, and to the use of research in health decision-making specifically. Major findings regarding barriers to evidence-based policy-making included poor communication and dissemination, lack of technical capacity in policy processes, as well as the influence of the political context. Policy-makers had a variable understanding of economic analysis, equity and burden of disease measures, and were vague in terms of their use in national decisions. Policy-maker recommendations regarding strategies for facilitating the uptake of research into policy included improving the technical capacity of policy-makers, better packaging of research results, use of social networks, and establishment of fora and clearinghouse functions to help assist in evidence-based policy-making.
本实证研究的目的是了解决策者对在中低收入国家卫生部门使用和影响研究的看法和态度。研究采用了来自阿根廷、埃及、伊朗、马拉维、阿曼和新加坡等六国的 83 名有针对性选取的国家层面决策者的 83 次半结构深入访谈数据。访谈内容围绕根据现有文献并与所有六国研究者协商制定的访谈指南展开。利用主题分析方法处理转录内容。本研究访谈的决策者明确表示支持卫生研究,并高度重视研究。但是,他们指出,研究对政策制定过程、对知识的总体贡献以及对卫生决策中研究的利用存在结构和非正式障碍。关于循证决策障碍的主要发现包括沟通和传播不畅、政策制定过程中的技术能力不足以及政治背景的影响。决策者对经济分析、公平和疾病负担措施的理解各不相同,而且在国家决策中使用这些措施也很模糊。决策者提出了促进将研究纳入政策的建议,包括提高决策者的技术能力、更好地包装研究结果、利用社交网络以及建立论坛和信息交换功能,以帮助进行循证决策。