Kuo Ling, Chao Tze-Fan, Liu Chia-Jen, Lin Yenn-Jiang, Chang Shih-Lin, Lo Li-Wei, Hu Yu-Feng, Tuan Ta-Chuan, Liao Jo-Nan, Chung Fa-Po, Chen Tzeng-Ji, Lip Gregory Y H, Chen Shih-Ann
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 23;6(6):e005307. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005307.
Patients with liver cirrhosis have been excluded from randomized clinical trials of oral anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. We hypothesized that patients with liver cirrhosis would have a positive net clinical benefit for oral anticoagulation when used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
This study used the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Among 289 559 atrial fibrillation patients aged ≥20 years, there were 10 336 with liver cirrhosis, and 9056 of them having a CHADS-VASc score ≥2 were divided into 3 groups, that is, no treatment, antiplatelet therapy, and warfarin. Patients with liver cirrhosis had a higher risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio=1.10, =0.046) and intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio=1.20, =0.043) compared with those without. Among patients with liver cirrhosis, patients taking antiplatelet therapy had a similar risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio=1.02, 95%CI=0.88-1.18) compared to those without antithrombotic therapies, but the risk was significantly lowered among warfarin users (hazard ratio=0.76, 95%CI=0.58-0.99). For intracranial hemorrhage, there were no significant differences between those untreated and those taking antiplatelet therapy or warfarin. The use of warfarin was associated with a positive net clinical benefit compared with being untreated or receiving only antiplatelet therapy.
For atrial fibrillation patients with liver cirrhosis in the current analysis of an observational study, warfarin use was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke and a positive net clinical benefit compared with nontreatment, and thus, thromboprophylaxis should be considered for such patients.
肝硬化患者被排除在房颤卒中预防口服抗凝治疗的随机临床试验之外。我们假设,肝硬化患者在用于房颤卒中预防时,口服抗凝治疗将产生净临床益处。
本研究使用了台湾国民健康保险研究数据库。在289559名年龄≥20岁的房颤患者中,有10336名患有肝硬化,其中9056名CHADS-VASc评分≥2的患者被分为3组,即未治疗组、抗血小板治疗组和华法林治疗组。与无肝硬化的患者相比,肝硬化患者发生缺血性卒中的风险更高(风险比=1.10,P=0.046),颅内出血风险也更高(风险比=1.20,P=0.043)。在肝硬化患者中,接受抗血小板治疗的患者与未接受抗血栓治疗的患者相比,发生缺血性卒中的风险相似(风险比=1.02,95%CI=0.88-1.18),但华法林使用者的风险显著降低(风险比=0.76,95%CI=0.58-0.99)。对于颅内出血,未治疗组与接受抗血小板治疗或华法林治疗的患者之间无显著差异。与未治疗或仅接受抗血小板治疗相比,使用华法林具有净临床益处。
在当前这项观察性研究分析中,对于伴有肝硬化的房颤患者,与不治疗相比,使用华法林可降低缺血性卒中风险并产生净临床益处,因此,应考虑对此类患者进行血栓预防。